Reflections Off a Mirror

Just another Media Factory site

Category: Lectorial (page 2 of 2)

Rock-umentary – Week #6

This week’s lectorial we were given little segments of scenes from the rock documentary “Mistaken for Strangers”. Personally, I am a big fan of the whole rock genre (which guy isn’t?), and I have always enjoyed watching documentary of music in general, not just about rock. Amy, Montage of Heck, It Might Get Loud and more are some of the all time favourites. But this rock-cumentary that I’m about to mention would be by far the most influential and inspiring, in my opinion, and that is Foo Fighter’s Back and Forth.

I’ve probably mentioned this before in my earlier posts (or not), but I am a huge Foo Fighters fan, like massively huge. And Dave Grohl (Frontman and lead singer of the Foo Fighters) is just a name that never fails to impress and just keep extending the yard stick by miles and miles. But all things considered, he’s still one of the most humble musicians in the world and probably as casual and layman as you can ever get which makes you wonder how has he made it this far and still carries such a laid back persona of not being arrogant, not living the material world, and inspiring kids to pick up the guitar and start a rock band some day.

If anyone was a rock fan or who listens to the Foo Fighters, I would highly recommend this film. It brings fans, old and new, up to speed from the death of Kurt Cobain and the disband of Nirvana, to their latest album (at the time this film was released), Wasting Light, on all the different lineups, episodes, politics and how they recorded Wasting Light right from Dave’s garage in stead of their very own state of the art studio out in the dessert, studio 606, and how Dave insisted on recording everything on tape.

On a side note, I decided to take on this film’s “interview” style for Project Brief 3, where there is only the subject talking without the aid of having a narrator. Having it more of a storytelling session rather than a 1 to 1 interview session as how I did it on the actual day of the shoot.

A Survival Guide to First 6 Weeks of Uni – Week #5

During this week’s workshop we were given this exercise and were taught how to use the Sony MC50 as well as how to use a tripod. Yes, it may seem quite fundamental, but it is just going through the formality of explaining how everything works so that everyone’s got a good understanding and that we’re all  on the same page. Besides, it serves as a good refresher for those who might already have worked on a Sony MC5, or something similar, as well as using a tripod. The exercise requires us to head out to record 2 interviewees and an interviewer, and some wide shots and cutaways. We had a little directional microphone attached to the top of the camera to pick up the audio from whatever the camera is pointing to.

20160406_110145

From the picture above as you can see that little red knob is slanted and the 3 of us who were grouped randomly by our tutor had a hard time scratching our heads on how to adjust that red knob to be flat. Despite getting the bubble dead center, the visuals wouldn’t be straight on the screen, or in technical terms, it would have appeared canted. However, despite having that problem, we decided to work our way around that and just adjusted the camera till we got a relatively level image on the screen and didn’t touch the settings on the tripod, except for folding the legs in while we were moving from location to location. Overall we managed to shoot what was required in the exercise brief and most importantly had fun taking up the different roles of being the interviewer, interviewee and the guy who stands behind the camera to press the little red button and gesture to the subject that we’re recording…

Other little minor hiccups we encountered were trying to find the right location around RMIT’s building 80. Since it was raining outside and we didn’t have that much time to run out to other venues, we decided to just find little pockets of the building where it was quiet and were not crowded. Obviously, some were taken up by other Media 1 groups doing the same exercise, but it was all good, there was enough space to go round.

After gathering all our raw footages around building 80, we transferred the files into our computers where we could edit and create a sequence from there. I’ve done a rough cut, but might want to fine tune it a little more before rendering and exporting it out into a final cut.

In a nutshell, I think it was a good exercise for us to get our hands on the little Sony MC50 which served as a good prequel to what’s to come in future assignments and exercises when working in the different studios. Oh and we did raise the issue we had over the tripod to our tutor, and she managed to find the nut that was locked and prevented the red knob from moving, so in future, when it comes to using the tripod, I think I would be more versed in doing so.

 

The Right Questions – Week #5

I am actually quite excited in getting my hands dirty for Project Brief 3. At this very moment, I have not really started on anything solid, but I have a very good idea on what I’ll be doing for the 1-2 minutes long video. Don’t want to spoil anything for anyone, but I am really looking forward to getting down to the actual production and recording process of my subject and the topics that we are going to cover.

In this week’s workshop, we were taught how to ask questions. And not just any ol’questions, questions that actually grab your audience attention and keep them wanting to know more. I try to keep myself in the audience’s shoes while I was brainstorming for questions that I intend to ask my subject. And I realised this phrase kept popping up in my mind, “And then? And then? And then? And then?”. It is just the fear of not asking enough to sieve out the answers and information I need to keep my audience attention in check. In newscasting there is the “grab” where it catches the attention of the viewer, and usually the “grab” only lasts 3 seconds before you loses the viewer’s attention. Therefore, in order to keep my audience’s attention, I would have to come up with good questions and not just a generic yes or no question for my subject. (Am still brainstorming questions).

As mention above, I’m still very much in the pre-production stage where I’m mainly planning and brainstorming ideas for the entire project. And location has been one of the main things to cover. Since it’s an interview, it should take place in somewhere quiet, where I can record the audio on a separate track and mix it into the sequence if I want to. If I were to do the interview in a crowded area or a place out in the open, whatever audible sound that is not my subject’s voice might bleed into the microphone, and I might have a hard time mixing or getting rid of that in post. Would want to have a big reminder on that, because it’s so easy to overlook that when I have my main focus on the visuals.

Speaking of visuals, there is a torrent of possibilities to carry out an interview, there is the person to person interview, the voice over (where you don’t see the interviewee, just a voice over some visuals), or just the interviewee speaking, and more. One tip that I got from this week’s lectorial was to get the subject to repeat the question in their answer. So if I asked what did you have for breakfast. Instead of my subject saying, “I had bacon and eggs…”, I should get them to say, “What I had for breakfast was bacon and eggs.”. And that would help so much in editing the film later. I would then have the option of including me, the interviewer, in the sequence, or just have my interviewee speaking on the topic. I have not really decided whether I should stick to one or have a mix of both, so I’ll need to consider that before I go into post production.

Another thing I was considering was the song choice or whether to even have a backing music throughout the sequence. But I realised, I would discover that along the way during post production, since I don’t have a hard and solid sequence yet. It would be good to have music to lift things and set the mood, but it might be a distraction for the audience. As mentioned during one of the workshops, while doing an interview or documentary, it is always good to have an instrumental track playing in the background while the interviewee is speaking so as to avoid any clashing with the vocals of a song that might have lyrics in it, so I’ll look out for that.

In a nutshell, I think I’m good to go, and now only thing’s stopping me is arranging a suitable time for my subject to be available for a shoot, but that’s being sorted out as I write this post. So I’m having my fingers crossed…

Element of Sound – Week #4

I never thought I'll see his name after graduating from poly until today..

I never thought I’ll see his name after graduating from poly until today..

This week’s lectorial touches the fundamentals of sound. Having done music and audio technology back in Singapore at Singapore Polytechnic, I felt very much back in my element. It was a good refresher after a few weeks of school and going through various topics, mostly with regards to film making or media in general.

When our lecture, Rachel, flashed John Cage’s 4′ 33″ on the screen, I chuckled to myself reminiscing of the times back in poly when my course mates and I were fooling around pretending to perform 4′ 33″ and we found it a convenient excuse for submitting works that might not be pleasing to our lecturers or just short of par from the assignment criteria.

I first heard of John Cage in a MIDI, Synthesis and Composition class where the lecturer was teaching a composition technique used by composers called “formalisms” and “chance”. It is how writing music could be left to the rolling a dice and leaving it to chance to see which number appears on top of the dice, or just putting some boundaries and parameters into a software and allow it to generate notes from there. At first glance, it might seem random, but how you alter the boundaries and parameters does affect how the music is being produced or played, therefore, it is not random, but in stead, left to chance. It is quite a complex theory to get the head around, but once you get it, it is quite simple. Ideally, “minimalist” music could be derived from this where the concept of less is more applies to this form of music. Just by adjusting the boundaries and parameters to narrow choice of notes and frequency of how many times the notes are being played, the software will then compose a piece which again is let to chance to see what notes are going to be played after the other.

Sound is such a broad topic that one can even complete an entire bachelor’s programme on it. Like myself, I graduated with a Music and Audio Technology diploma, and decided to enrol on the Bachelor of Communications (Media) to broaden my skill sets as well as build my network with people abroad. Sound covers from sound effects to music, dialogues to monologues, diegetic to non-diegetic sounds, and the list goes on. Not forgetting the technology and production side of sound from recording to mixing and processing. It is true that sound can make or break a film. How could you tell if the budget of the film is high or low? Just listen to the sound. If the sound is boomy, unrefined, echoey, jarring, muddy, the budget of that particular film is probably pretty low. Unlike video where you can do some minor corrections and editing if there was a flaw in the visuals, you can never correct or edit waveforms if you have recorded something with other sounds that didn’t come from the original source.

The art of recording is delicately simple, just point a microphone to the source. How hard can that be? Well, there are many things that needs to be taken into consideration before you hit that red dot, otherwise known as the record button. The level of your signal coming in, making sure it’s not too low or too high (otherwise clipping or distortion might occur). The ambient sound that might be bleeding into the microphone. If you’re miking a musical instrument, you have to decide on the type of mic? (A condenser or dynamic or ribbon. Different make and model does shape your recording as well). The type of miking technique? (XY, MS, 120, mono). And of course, making sure the microphones that you’re using isn’t phasing, but that’s one of the few things you can correct when you’re mixing.

Now to mixing. As straight forward as mixing goes, you just have to make sure nothing’s too loud, nothing’s too soft, everything is level, panning left and right to have a good stereo mix, it is still very hard to get that right sweet spot where everything isn’t fighting with something else. Human beings have the threshold of hearing of 20hz and threshold of pain at 20khz, anything in between is audible to the human brain. Therefore, mix engineers have that band width to play around with various frequency levels, what to boost, what to cut and so on. Mixing is one of the key stages in producing an artist’s album or in a feature film. Best way to tell a good mix from a bad mix is that you don’t notice anything that might stand out from the mix. Everything should be buttered together nice and smooth. Nothing too loud, nothing too soft.

One thing I realised that was not mentioned in the lectorial was the cocktail party effect. Wikipedia’s definition states, “The cocktail party effect is the phenomenon of being able to focus one’s auditory attention on a particular stimulus while filtering out a range of other stimuli, much the same way that a partygoer can focus on a single conversation in a noisy room.This effect is what allows most people to “tune into” a single voice and “tune out” all others. It may also describe a similar phenomenon that occurs when one may immediately detect words of importance originating from unattended stimuli, for instance hearing one’s name in another conversation.“. Don’t you ever wonder why is it that when you’re in a packed train with people talking and the baby in the pram is crying and someone’s got their earphones blasting out heavy metal music, but you are still able to have a conversation with your friend? That’s the cocktail party effect working right there. Our minds have a built-in mixing console to help us filter out sounds that are not as desired and turn up the those that we focus on or are paying attention to.

I could go on and on about sound and how it affects our everyday lives, our music, our TV and film, just because it is one of my interest and what I have studied prior to this. In a nutshell, sound is everywhere and it’s presence not only can be heard, but felt. Can be touch people, and spread a message across to thousands, or millions.

Media In the Future – Week #3

This week’s lectorial didn’t take place due to the Labour Day holiday. Interesting story behind that, as I found it puzzling to why some of my friends from other universities still have school on that day. RMIT used to be a technological institute, unlike the other universities such as University of Melbourne, and therefore we were part of the labour movement, hence we still do observe such public holidays. Just a little information I received from a fellow tennis player at the weekly hits at Carlton Garden Tennis Club.

Back to lectorial, the readings assigned to us for week #3 was not so much a reading, but more of watching a YouTube video of a man who just launched his book on media studies. He touches on 2 very different categories in the media industry, both with very different motives and are strongly driven by very different set of goals. 1 being capitalisation and making money, generating revenue out of it. While the other being expressing our creativity, passion and arts. Unfortunately, most of the time, these 2 do not go hand-in-hand. At one point in time, 1 has to be compromised to make way for the other.

Another thing that he mentioned was how we should only look forward when it comes to learning, or using media. We shouldn’t dwell on the past, because the past is history and there’s no point, as some things back then might not hold any value currently or might have been obsolete. I however, might not agree with this point to some extend. We definitely have to look back at some point in time to review how far we’ve come, how far we might have ahead of us, and what were the mistakes we might have made and learnt from. True, we have to look ahead, as media evolves, little by little, every single day. It might not seem like it, but before we know it, media would have changed, taking shapes and form like the stock market, no one can predict. A decade ago, we were still using phones that were only made to make phone calls, text messages, 2D games and maybe, if you had a little more money, a coloured screen with a built-in camera. Today, almost everyone has a smartphone that could call, text, take pictures, listen to songs, check/reply to emails, surf the web, navigate, and so much more. How would media evolve next? Your guess is as good as mine.

One last point I’d like to raise from that short 7 minutes video was the observation he made. The definition of “share” has taken on a whole different meaning of posting something on your Facebook timeline, and newsfeed, which I find that so true. The internet has came up with so many terms and words that we might use in our everyday lives. It’s just mind boggling how much we rely on the Internet these days, however it works like a double edged sword, it opens up so many opportunities for cyber crime, bullying and who knows what.

Having said the above, sometimes I think it’s just good to take a step back to observe the world that we live in today, and occasionally fall back onto old simple technology before it got so complicated. For example, instead of making friends online, maybe taking a walk in the park and just meeting new people from there. Or listening to music CDs from a CD player instead of playing it from an iPod. Like how the Foo Fighters made their Sonic Highways album using tape instead of ProTools, due to the kind of sound or tone it treats the music, you can’t reproduce that on a digital audio workstation. Some things from the past are just worth revisiting every once in a while.

Media Media on the Wall – Lectorial Reflection – Week #2

“Media Media on the wall,

Way up high or on the floor.

Brings you news or down to fall.

Media Media on the wall”

This week’s lectorial was pretty interesting as it was split into 2 segments. First half gave us a brief introduction to editing in post production by a guest lecturer. I personally have not been given any formal tutoring with regards to editing, so I would say that was my first time someone’s introduced to me the art of editing, more so that person was from the industry and he’s doing it for a living. Some key things that he mentioned were do we decide on when to make a cut or whether to make a long or a short cut, which boggles me. While watching a movie or a TV show, it does not really occur to the viewer when a scene changes or when it cuts to a different camera or transitions from one set to another. As a viewer, you just watch the entire show as one whole show. Having said that, being an editor, it comes down to really selecting which shots to use and/or whether to take cut it short or long. Coming from a music and audio background, I took a module called, “Music for Moving Images” and one thing I learned from that was, you want to get your music to sound like it isn’t there. If the audience or viewer finds something weird with the music, or sound effect, you probably have failed as a film scorer or a foley artist. Which in many cases apply to other areas of film and TV show. You want your viewer to have a whole experience, instead of watching out for blips or errors. It should flow and flow with certain rhythm. I’m still get my head around the idea that for every cut, every take, every camera angle, every direction, it came from somebody and there is definitely a certain meaning and explanation behind it, however, as technical as it may sound, while watching a film or TV show, it almost seems natural.

Moving on to the second bit of the lectorial. We were tasked to look out for any forms of media at a certain location that we were given, and note it down. My group was assigned to Emporium, basically an upped market shopping centre with high end branded goods from electronics to fashion, which translates to an opportunity full of media. Media everywhere from advertisement posters, billboards, dummies, mascots, food samples, to say the least. And those were in your face in the foreground, more subtle media would be ambient music playing in the mall, statues or mannequins hung from the ceiling or displayed at the front of shops. Not forgetting interactive information directories that engages shoppers to participate in little games and challenges to win lucky draws. Last but not least, people and myself, using our smartphones to take pictures, surf the web, listen to music, and more.

What I noticed throughout this exercise is that we are so reliant on media that it drives us in our daily lives. On the other hand, media thrives on consumer behaviour and how the masses uses it. In other words, both side, consumer and media requires each other in order for the other to exist. Like Brian mentioned in the lectorial, media is almost like an ecology where everyone is in and how we live in it, but media still requires the end user to participate or engage in whatever form of media it represents. We live in a day and age where we can’t possibly go through a day without noticing media, unless we live in a jungle or somewhere rural where technology may be somewhat scarce.

To sum it all up, it’s a simple case of, it takes 2 hands to clap. And I wouldn’t want to be around to hear the sound of one hand clapping.

Newer posts
Skip to toolbar