Deconstructing a scene that is produced with a professional crew, cast and a budget to cater for effective production value, seems simple compared with deconstructing a short scene that I produced in my lounge room. With an objective view I can make assumptions and criticisms on professionally produced scenes. As the director of the ‘Dance Scene’ I can speculate subjectively, on my intentions and how they were reflected through the cinematography and overall reception of the scene.
As an audience member I struggled to watch the scene without bias. My relationship with the actors and my knowledge of the overall process of filming causes my judgement to be altered. Robin watched the final film in class. His initial reaction was to laugh at the awkwardness and tension between the characters. This immediate reaction reinforced my desired intention for the scene.
Robin’s advice to us, that has been reinforced the entire semester so far, has been to focus on pace and to give our characters and shots time to be established. This has resonated with me. Approaching this task, I wanted to experiment with capturing the action using long and drawn out shots. The filming of this scene was quite organic. There was minimal preparation on a technical level. Preparation was put into determining character objectives, pace and overall intention.
Colourful party lights were placed to set the stage for the audience. Simultaneously the lights and the sound scape reveal a ‘party scene’. These elements allow the audience to make an instant connection to a ‘party’, enabling the omission of dialogue. The lights are placed strategically over the background and over lapping the female character. The lights give depth to the shots as well as emphasise the irony between the two characters. They flash all over the screen contrasting the static movements of the characters. This effect heightens the tension between the characters as they remain bored by the chaos.
The opening panning (by a rotating cheese board) shot of the feet introduces the two characters. The presentation of the shoes reveal the two very different characters and their proximity towards one another. The wide shot further develops their proximity, revealing the awkwardness of their relationship. The boy watches the girl as she seems disinterested. This is not a realistic interpretation of a traditional ‘dance scene’. The boy intensely watching the girl is over exaggerated. It mimics a comedy ‘skit’ where the boy is destined for failure but tries anyway. The close up of the girl reinforces to the audience that she is not interested in the boy at all. This close up heightens the humour when the boy asks her to dance, regardless of her gestures and body language.
The choice of shots was between a tilt from the boys hand up to his face and an eye level mid shot of the boy looking down to the girl. The tilted shot was chosen as the pace is slow and the angle, although not a Point of View, diminishes the character of the boy. The camera looks up to the boy, identifying his personal strength to offer this girl a dance.
The dialogue, asking the girl to dance, was not necessary and could have been omitted. The characters body language was enough to indicate that the girl was deterred by the boy.
Cutting back to the wide shot at the end of the scene reinforces the humour. It would not have been as effective if the scene finished on a different angle. The wide shot at the end was the ‘punch line’ for the scene, essentially finishing where they started.
Reflection:
Reflecting on this production has allowed me to identify strengths and weaknesses that I have in the process of production. I worked well under pressure, therefore, I will allow myself to work under strict time constraints. I don’t want to spend too much time over working a scene. I want to be completely organised. This scene worked because, as a director, I knew exactly what I wanted – I knew my intentions and my character objectives. I will thoroughly establish these elements for my upcoming scenes.