Using Edward De Bono’s ultra-happy ‘Six Thinking Hats’ (four in class) as criteria for our first assignment was ultimately ineffective. Three of the four hats lean towards to the positive side of the spectrum, while the black hat is (in theory) more negative. This, to me, is a problem; there is not enough of a balance. The real problem, however, was that using this system is impractical for a class that has barely been together for two weeks.

Using a system that blindly favours positivity in groups denies one an opportunity to give and take honest criticism. This is largely out of fear, which in our context is perfectly natural. We are in week two, adjusting to a new climate, and nobody wants to be known as ‘that person’ who gives criticism. I myself felt uncomfortable giving negative feedback, despite my belief that it was appropriate. However, I feel we must address this culture of cowardice if we are going to succeed in such a ruthless industry.

I feel this generation has a problem giving and taking face-to-face criticism. We have grown up in an age where we have been shielded from reality. We hide behind our computers, where we have access to all, and therefore, think we know all. The moment we are faced with genuine criticism, we take it personally, despite its intentions. I don’t know about you, but I want to be criticised. I want to hear other people’s views. I want to be truly open with one another. I am not going to make it in this industry without a few harsh lessons along the way. We should embrace criticism, and change this culture of ultra-positivity.

If we were to have had this project solely assessed by our tutor, I feel we would be able to receive honest feedback. If we were to present in groups again, perhaps we should be encouraged to express our views.

There is no such thing as a bad idea. Except there is.

“Gold stars for everybody”