SIAL

25-05-15

 

Entering the Design Hub armed with my fellow soldier Gloria and our weapons of choice (Microphone, XLR cord, Portable Recorder and Notepads), I found myself nervous and strangely excited at the idea of interviewing Dr. Lawrence Harvey in his battleground (the SIAL Studios).

 

SIAL = Spatial Information Architecture Laboratory. It is a partially independent branch of RMIT that focuses its efforts on discovering the potential that spatial sound and design has on the audio, architectural, scientific and theoretical frontiers of the modern world.

 

Being guided down the halls of this grandiose building is an experience that can only be likened to that of walking through the Starship Enterprise. Huge concrete walls engulf your vision and dwindle and natural light that penetrates through the front door.. the walls are only interrupted by discrete corners housing futuristic designs of model buildings and ginormous doors that took the Zealander approach and were at least “3 times bigger” than the average rectangular holes in walls we are used to.

 

After navigating the near endless maze of corridors to get to the SIAL Studios, we finally arrived and were welcomed by a plethora of audio and sound gear that would make any audiophiles appendage stand to attention.

 

Being prompted by Lawrence to “pull up a seat and make {ourselves} comfortable”, both Gloria and myself unraveled our weapons and began the arduous process of setting up for the interview. After we managed to untangle the cords and route the signals, we unpacked our notebooks tentatively delivered our first blow.

 

Once the formalities were aside and the awkwardness of addressing a Dr. had subsided, the interview began to unfold before our very ears and conversation flowed quite naturally. Exchanging witty repartee, in-depth conversations about audio technology and the choice of Lawrence’s yoghurt (vaalia in case you were wondering), the three of us engaged in a discussion that went uninterrupted until we noticed that our time was almost up.

 

It was at this moment that Lawrence offered for gloria and myself to witness the gear in its full glory, as he decided to play a spatially mixed piece of audio that would engulf us in its beauty.

 

To say I was excited at this notion would be an understatement.

 

3, 2, 1….

 

Whooooah!!

 

It was an experience! A thing of sheer awesomeness!! It managed to immerse us all in its frequencies and travel around the room at will, formulating a mix of epic proportions.

 

The clock struck 2:00 and these little mice had to leave as Lawrence had a class to facilitate.

 

I urge anyone out there reading this blog to go in and see the SIAL Studios and experience the awesomeness that is Spatial Sound, for it will not be the last time that one will find me there.

 

– donandsherri

Arthur C. Clarke

Technology.

 

The strand of Media that our group had the blessing of being gifted.

 

During my research into the future of technology in the audio industry, I managed to venture further down the rabbit hole than I had initially intended and in doing so, dirtied my fluffy white tail…however I came out the other side more enlightened and with one name on my mind.

 

Arthur C. Clarke – Scientist, Science Writer & Futurist.

This gentleman had a very important role not only in the scientific world, but also in the popular culture world; having worked with Stanley Kubrik as a key writer in 2001: A Space Odyssey.

 

The part of Clarke’s life that I wanted to focus on and utilise in the depiction of Technology in audio was his 1960 televisual segment “A Vision of the Future”, where Clarke depicts not only what the future will look like, but also the meanings behind what people who predict the future are really achieving.

 

The reason for choosing this piece will become apparent once our artefact is complete.

 

– donandsherri

Institutionalised

12-05-15

 

Institutions.

 

The aim of this weeks lectorial was to address the frameworks that govern institutions and highlight how they have come about as well as their importance in the modern media world.

 

Institutions are a social construct. They are interested with the flow of power.

 

Power = Knowledge.

 

So if institutions hold power it is assumed they hold knowledge. However I have to disagree with this notion, for not all institutions hold knowledge; or should I say correct knowledge.

 

1939 – 1945 the Nazi campaign had a hold on Germany and held the power..however, did they hold the knowledge? They stated that Jews were the downfall of western society and therefore had to be eradicated, so that the world could progress. This is obviously not the case and I feel perfectly encapsulates my notion that Institutions (Power) do no necessarily hold knowledge.

 

– donandsherri

Narrative – The Twist

“Narrative is any kind of retelling of a sequence of events”

 

This is the first broad statement that is made during the  on Narrative, and it turns out to be quite a good statement.

 

In the Lectorial the ideals and underpinnings of the term Narrative are unfolded – as it turns out there are three main story elements (character development, plot & resolution) that fall under the CAUSALITY framework, that ultimately make up a Narrative.

 

Character Development : is usually achieved over time. It is usually generated by subjecting characters to a series of events, that there reactions to and response of, shape the way the audience perceives them.

 

Plot : is the skeleton of the film / story. It usually defined as the chronological sequence of events within the Narrative.

 

Resolution : This is the ultimate culmination of everything that has proceeded it. It is the final act in the sequence of events and generally is the final part in a characters development. The End, if you will…

 

These practices that make up Narrative have been challenged in recent times by the ideas of non-narrative. Films that lack any discernible plot, resolution, character development or even characters at all.. however I feel this idea of non-narrative fails as people will ultimately project their own opinions and stories onto the piece and ultimately form their own narrative.

 

– donandsherri