5.2 Assignment Studio Reflection

I hope my artefact engages the audience by combining humor with social commentary, using satire to reveal the absurdities of comical objects. By juxtaposing a 1960s protagonist with modern-day elements like TikTok and vaping, the film invites viewers to reflect on how different the culture has vastly changed, often in bizarre ways. It aligns with the studio’s key concern to embed comic events in the “non-comedy” genre like drama or documentary, allowing for more suspenseful intersections of comedy. 

If I continued working on my short spy film, I would focus on refining two key elements to enhance the overall quality and impact. Firstly, I still see the underperformance in the set design. As we do not have enough resources to create the exact look of the ’60s era, we slightly create unfavorable loopholes. Agent Whyte and the boss are from 1964, but the agency’s setup and characters’ dialogue do not belong to 1964. After re-watching the 1964 scenes multiple times, I would love to create a better interpretation – how people interpret meanings through social languages (narratives, gestures, and so on). Furthermore, we lack concentration on the side character’s storytelling. Most events revolve around Agent Whyte most of the time; thus we waste opportunities to invest in potential characters such as Agent Whollie. One technique I learned from sketching the story is to identify the goals of your comic characters to expose their stagnant characteristics, and their actions in pursuit of goals should match their traits (Toplyn 2014). We neglect the drive of Boss to hunt down Agent Wollie for the file and the schemings of Wollie against the Boss. It lacks the condensed background to build up the character’s motives, leaving the film flat with easy resolution

Secondly, improving logistics and pre-production is also important. My initial lack of experience with shot lists and storyboards was a hurdle. On the first day of shooting, I was lost in keeping up with the schedule. Staying too long at one scene held us back from keeping the progress on time. Therefore, I felt the need to have an intricate production sheet where I planned what activities I had to follow during the day and the timelines for them. I watched a helpful YouTube tutorial, “How To Storyboard Even if You Can’t Draw”, and found out that even if I can not draw, executing good direction lines beneath each scene is viable enough. Moreover, I used the Shot Design App to create a 2D model of the shots. It was a supportive document on set, especially when actors understood their characters most thoroughly and might not have the best understanding of the director’s terms. Speaking to them clearly about your shoot intention and getting feedback from them come up with spontaneous ideas that were not part of the initial plan.

Reflecting on the media works “Operation Superstar” and “Situation Tragedy” from our studio, I gained specific insights into the key idea of Benign Violation, which explores how deviations from social norms can trigger laughter (Warren and McGraw 2014). This concept also aligns with the Story Sketch idea, emphasizing that every character needs a motive, and their personalities are crafted to highlight that motive (Toplyn 2014).

In “Operation Superstar,” Paul’s actions create a sense of unease as he desperately seeks attention by violating norms. His character shows a serious motive after being overwhelmed with being unnoticed, in that he puts a condom in a cast member’s sandwich and openly admits it to everyone. Still, it fails to get the attention he craves, nevertheless the horrible things he did. His extravagant behavior is an act of norm-breaking, meant to provoke laughter through discomfort and absurdity. Similarly, in “Situation Tragedy,” the characters Kevin, Adam, and Josh embark on a wild adventure in search of Millie Bobby Brown. The drug hallucination leads to absurd and humorous actions, such as the boys neglecting Kevin when he gets lost in the water or meeting the pirate. This scenario highlights their carefree and spontaneous nature despite facing consequences, that defy the logical senses. Again, these examples underscore how the careful construction of character motives and personalities can effectively utilize the benign violation theory to elicit laughter.

In engaging the media work “Picture the Moment” from the Scene in Cinema Studio, its focus is to recreate the vibe of inspirational Ghibli films. I understand that this final project requires you to draw your personal feelings from inspirational cinematic experiences and recreate them using your vision. The producers intend to create a lo-fi nature-type look that speaks to the common aesthetic design in Ghibli films. It requires a sophisticated analysis of Ghibli’s films to conclude what makes Ghibli’s animation mesmerizing and tranquil. Ghibli’s stories speak to morally humane themes and catalyze nature to emphasize its influence on expressing the inner moods of characters. Therefore, they employ static shot composition, which captures the nature around the in-focus character, with the support of minimalist camera movements. The narrative, centered on a photographer reminiscing about a lost friend through capturing silent moments in nature, further highlights the themes of memory, connection, and solitude.

Reference List:

Toplyn, J. (2014), “Story Sketches” in Comedy Writing for Late-Night TV, New York: Twenty Lane Media, pp. 221–238.

Warren, C. & McGraw, A.P. (2015), “Benign Violation Theory” in Attardo, S. (ed), Encyclopedia of Humor Studies, Los Angeles: SAGE Reference.

 

 

 

#4 ASSIGNMENT – Reflecting: Final Reflective Essay

I hope my artefact engages the audience by combining humor with social commentary, using satire to reveal the absurdities of comical objects. By juxtaposing a 1960s protagonist with modern-day elements like TikTok and vaping, the film invites viewers to reflect on how much culture has changed, often in bizarre ways. It aligns with the studio’s key concern to embed comic events in the “non-comedy” genre like drama or documentary, allowing for more suspenseful intersections of comedy. At the start of the semester, my comedy was framed in an independent genre. I opposed genre hybridization because I was not confident combining aesthetic formats that compensate for the dominant comedy vibe. However, I acknowledge that the comic frame is built on the role of context we access and constitutes variable meanings tailored to each person (Voth 2014). Therefore, I took the last major projects as an opportunity to challenge the hybridization of spy themes and comedy modes.

 

If I continued working on my short spy film, I would focus on refining several key elements to enhance the overall quality and impact. Firstly, I would delve deeper into the genre hybridization by balancing the comedic and satirical tones more effectively. Following Meikle’s (2012) analysis of the fake news TV series Brass Eyes, satire is more than calling out the framed subjects and justifying views. Each subject should be treated differently based on our perspectives and distances from the satirical subjects. As our format is not live TV shows, we speculate our method to communicate views of satirical subjects in a short film format that our character, Agent Whyte, exaggerates her expression when confronting the subjects. What still needs to be worked on is more research into how the typical ’60s comedy movie is portrayed contrasting to the modern look. Logically, our character is from 1964; thus, her expression and social perception differ from the contemporary generation. Spending time editing and rewatching the 1964 scenes, I realized we needed the 1964s context – how people interpret meanings through social languages (narratives, gestures, and so on). However, I am satisfied with our investing efforts in portraying a clumsy and insensible Agent Whollie and reimagining how her character would survive in 2024.

 

Furthermore, I suggest modifying and extending the script. Since this is our first film-making experience, we will unlikely avoid the unforeseeable plotholes. Most events spin around Agent Whyte in the large time length that we neglect to discuss the depth of other important characters. One technique I learned from sketching the story is identify the goals of your comic characters to expose their stagnant characteristics and their action in the pursuit of goals should match their traits (Toplyn 2014). We neglect the drive of Boss to hunt down Agent Wollie for the file and the schemings of Wollie against the Boss. As a result, we tend to resolve the plotholes by Wollie breaking down the situation through her few lines. It lacks the condensed background to build up the character’s motives, leaving the film a simple run-and-chase between spy and bad guy.

 

Improving logistics and technical execution is another priority. My initial lack of experience with shot lists and storyboards was a hurdle, but I’ve discovered valuable resources that can guide me in creating more detailed planning documents. This YouTube tutorial has given me different ways to compile visual guides for the shot, such as How To Storyboard Even if You Can’t Draw. I used specifically the Shot Design App to create a 2D model of how the shot will be played out from the director’s view. I would love to excel more in shot list organization. I realized the success of a shot list depends on good logistic execution, including but not limited to location scouting and reviews, and technical capability. One example is the scene when Whoyte is looking for clues to find Wollie and her face is a bit underexposed on camera. Our initial plan was to shoot at midday but it was pushed back to late afternoon after we finished other priority shots. However, if I were more delicate, I would plan alternate options to bring more light kits or choose proper locations.

 

Lastly, I would love to excel in camera proficiency, especially in focal lengths and movements. Two helpful resources will help me prosper in creating unique visual ideas: https://eyecannndy.com/search/ and Frame Set. There were a few scenes when I rewatched again during the edit, I was thinking of shooting different ways. For instance, I would love to try the wide shot (imitating the look from an anamorphic lens) to create the look of Agent Whyte when she was standing outside the Flinder Station as an outsider in this world.

 

I am satisfied with the experience of working with different groups throughout this semester. The drive to change the groups occasionally would help me find suitable teammates for the last project. I was in groups with people whose working styles were contradictory. I am proud of my final project group as the majority put concentrated effort into getting the best result. Moreover, I feel that my opinion can be easily transmitted and teammates validate my slight vision from my experiences of producing and editing. For instance, I suggested using a shot list and slate that helped us cut short editing time. I also learned to validate others’ contributions to the output. Before this class, I did not have experience working in a production group because I enjoyed taking charge of every element in the artifact to fulfill my visual desires. Also, scheduling conflicts and differing opinions sometimes slowed decision-making, especially during the strenuous final week before the deadline. I understand that variations of shot placement change meaning and though an individual shot has a different meaning; when it is combined with other shots, the meanings change (Dharmendra 2023). Therefore, it is substantial that everyone will have a different view of which edit cuts work. These challenges, though frustrating, taught me the importance of clear communication, flexibility, and compromise. I am proud that after all, we have a mutual vision to foster a positive teamwork environment and allow each person’s strength to thrive in the project.

Reference List

Dharmendra C (2024) ‘Image comprehension and the emotional response to film editing’, AIP Conference Proceedings, doi: 10.1063/5.0179615.

Meikle, G. (2012), “‘Find Out Exactly What to Think—Next!’: Chris Morris, Brass Eye, and Journalistic Authority”, Popular Communication, 10(1–2), pp. 14–26.

Toplyn, J. (2014), “Story Sketches” in Comedy Writing for Late-Night TV, New York: Twenty Lane Media, pp. 221–238.

Voth, B. (2014), “Comic Frame” in The Encyclopedia of Humor Studies, Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, pp. 148–150.