Reflection
This week’s exploration of satire delved into the intricacies of using humor as a tool for social commentary and critique. Meikle’s analysis of Chris Morris’s “Brass Eye” and Caterson’s examination of the absurdity in modern life provided valuable insights into the mechanisms of satire and its role in challenging societal norms and institutions.
Our group’s project on the rental crisis employed parody as a means of enhancing our satirical message. By adopting the format of a reality TV show, specifically inspired by “House Hunters,” we aimed to satirize the absurdity and challenges faced by university students in finding affordable housing. Through the exaggerated portrayal of typical house-hunting scenarios, such as touring ludicrous locations like a room on campus or an alleyway, we sought to highlight the absurdity of the rental market and the struggles faced by young people.
In aligning our project with the theories explored in Meikle’s and Caterson’s readings, we aimed to subvert the conventions of traditional housing narratives and question the legitimacy of societal structures. By employing parody within the framework of satire, we were able to engage our audience in a humorous yet thought-provoking exploration of a pressing social issue.
This project underscored the power of satire to provoke critical reflection and inspire dialogue about contemporary issues. Through the careful selection of comedic techniques, such as parody, we were able to effectively communicate our message while entertaining and engaging our audience.
Credits:
Meikle, G. (2012), “‘Find Out Exactly What to Think—Next!’: Chris Morris, Brass Eye, and Journalistic Authority”, Popular Communication, 10(1–2), pp. 14–26.
Caterson, S. (2005), “A Preposterous Life”, Griffith Review, 8 (June 2005), pp. 186–192.