Project Xanadu

Hypertexts are not a thing that I am personally knowledgeable of and remains aloof despite this reading. According to Ted Nelson, hypermedia is the non-sequential presentation of information, working as a “framework of reunification”. This technology basically allows audience to create new forms based on their own interests by giving them the opportunity to choose which linking processes to follow. The possibilities are endless with linear documents accessible to multiple users, as well as the categorisation of messages according to social-strategic archetypes.

On the other hand, there are issues that negatively impacted hypertexts as with any new technology in its initial conception. The issue
of compatibility is taken into consideration, but most importantly is the essential “computer literacy” the user must possess to use such. Most information is presented into a near-hierarchical structure and are often coded into other people’s frameworks often inappropriate to the user’s.

As a solution, Nelson proposes to “bring literature, science, art and civilisation to new heights of understanding through hypertext,” in order to reduce the audience’s resentment towards what he aptly labels the ‘computer tide’. He suggests that hypermedia has the potential to bring a “new Golden age” in the future, through the unification of all electronic text systems.

Project Xanadu, invented during the fall of 1960, was considered as the first hypertext system designed for single users, office network servers and public franchising with all features included. The idea brought about what was described as a “pool of storage,” particularly to make new things out of old (think, recycle). The system is consisted of three parts; origin, where the elements begin; commonality, the sharing of elements between units, and links, the process of marking, annotating and connecting portions of units. The writer claims that the project will safely preserve the heritage of mankind, and at the same time, making it accessible.

Bush speculates on how we think

From here on out, to fulfill the number of posts we are required to put up, I shall be dividing my thoughts on each reading per post.

Beginning with Bush and his inferential article, I am led to believe that Science did not only “improve our lives”, but also opened the world to the wider community we live in, instead of the self-centered universes one was inclined to be content with in the past. Ultimately, Science enhanced communications beyond our personal circles of close friends and family, to what we now know as globalisation. It is simply, the thought that what I myself am writing, as of this moment, could be read half way around the world…as long as there is internet access, of course.

The writer also comments on how specialisation in Science found itself to having work not receiving its proper commendations. Many essential research are left abandoned, with no appropriate evaluation and unused. He criticises our reviewing methods as at the same level as many years ago, positively “medieval”. On the other hand, Bush suggests that what causes the advancement of our society today, is our access to resources (implemented by globalisation I assume), with basis on historical inventions close to modern technology that failed because of a lack in resource.

Our “modern” society continues to evolve, with methods of recording in the forefront and the transformation of new age photography.

Literally the last Airbender film

Probably the biggest let-down in film industry is M Shyamalan’s rendition of the Nickelodeon cartoon Avatar: The Last Airbender, simply titled “The Last Airbender”. I have no quarrels with  the title, but I do contest the overuse of narration and lack of actual bending (and humour which makes the cartoon spectacular for a cartoon), as I seemingly watch a karate slash white asians in organised choreography.

The YouTube video above explains everything and more.