Group Project Overview

So Recently we’ve been put into groups for our final project. The final Project is fairly flexible and allows us to come up with almost anything that we’d like to do. We have to come up with what we’d like to explore and how we are going to go about it.

In our first group meeting we all came in with separate ideas that we’d like to explore, some where story based concepts and some where technical based concepts. My idea was to explore genre through a scientific experiment sort of way, keeping most of the variables as similar as possible only changing the genre. I thought this would be a good exercise to do and luckily the group agreed. So we decided to use that as the base of our project. We also brought another members idea of looking at the same action through different characters perspective, combing that with the genre experiment.

Our second group meeting we tried to fine tune some of our ideas and figure out the overarching story that we’re going to have for all the stories. Eventually we decided that a love interest would be a good generic story arch that we could manipulate to different genres. We also decided on the Genres and Characters that we were going to use in our project. FairyTale, Horror, Teen Movie, Noir and mockumentary, with an individual character to front each genre.

The Storyline that we have decided on after various meetings is the following:
Based in a school, a school ball/party goes terribly wrong when the Punch gets severely spiked and hallucinations incur, creating damage to the school. 5 Students are brought to the Principles office, each with potential motives for spiking the Drink. From the Principles Office each student retells their story leading up to the Ball from their different perspectives, each set in a different genre.

We have decided to pitch this as a 6 part miniseries, 5 characters each have their own episode, plus an episode bringing all the stories together. What we will actually film for the project is a few scenes from different scripts that we have written for the story, juxtaposing them together to analyse the different tropes in use to create genre.

We have all agreed that we’ll split the work evenly, with every team member taking on a genre and character to write about individually. When it comes to filming we will also divide the roles up evenly, changing depending on what shoot we are doing.

All in all I’m really excited for the Project, i’m just disappointed that we don’t have the time or the resources to create the full mini series.

 

Week 4 reflection – becoming an actor

In our groups for the week we did some more filming, this time from scripts that the creative writing students had written. First thing I notice is that my scripts are nowhere near the creativity of the the writing students, the way that they write gives the script a lot more depth. However I would like to take this reflection to look at the actors side of things.

In this exercise I was acting for the other group of people who were practicing their technical skills behind the camera. The first thing I learnt as an actor: it can take a while before you’re actually needed. The crew take a while to talk through their idea and set up the camera and readjust minor details before they even think about involving the actors. So, acting can be a waiting game.

In terms of getting my character from a script: I can see how much easier it is to have it all written out in front of you. Not just your dialogue but the motivation behind actions as well. By knowing this it’s a lot easier to act in the way that the director wants you to. So, the key to a happy actor is a proper script.

Because I still had my director’s hat on from when I was filming my scenes, it was difficult not to throw in technical ideas into the mix when I heard the crew talk about their plans, not having much to do in between the takes also didn’t help. Although props to the director because he asked me and the other actor to rehearse our lines so that we’re confident enough in our performance, when we stopped he’d ask us to run through one more time; which did seem to make the time go faster and the repetition did actually make me more confident. So, a preoccupied actor is a good actor.

When the time did come to shooting our scenes the director took us through step by step what the camera was going to do and how we should react within the frame. Knowing this helped us streamline to the quick schedule as we didn’t have to go for that many takes. By giving me specific instructions like: wait a beat after his line, make your arms bigger, seem more crazy, all helped me deliver what the director was looking for. So, a well informed actor is a fast actor.

It was interesting to be on the other side of the lens for a change and it has given me a new found respect for professional actors and their craft.

Giving it a Shot – Personal Exercise

In the past few weeks we have learnt certain skills and techniques in class about how to create and use a script on a film shoot. I decided to bring those skills and techniques to a small project of my own to see how it was working in a different environment.

The team that I worked with I have worked with on multiple occasions so already we know how each other works and we work well together. Generally though, we have an idea that we loosely all understand and then we work out everything else while we’re shooting. Obviously it’s not the most efficient way of working but its done well in the past. By changing things up and working more on the pre-production and the use of scripts and marking them up was different and difficult at first, mainly because it’s not the exciting bit and you just want to go out and film something, but nevertheless, I stuck at it and found a few revelations.

First off, it almost halves your production time something I couldn’t really learn from the small exercises that we do at school. By giving an actor a full script instead of saying “say something like . . .” the actor seems more confident in less takes and although I don’t like the way that it restricts a few creative freedoms it definitely helps to streamline the process. By giving your crew the mark up of a script and listing exactly what shots you want you can move quicker then when you’re trying to picture what shot should come next. So what would’ve taken a whole weekend to film actually only took us about 6 hours, which is such a great thing to know now that free time to film is dwindling in the midst of uni and work.

Another thing that surprised me was the amount of input I got from my crew when we were marking things up. I would’ve thought that me providing the finished script wouldn’t have aloud the others to add their creative input however I decided to have a read through with the actors and crew where we could mark up our individual scripts with what was needed like we had done in a few of the class exercises. Surprisingly, I would even go so far as to say there was more creative input when we were marking the script up than when ideas were just thrown around during the shoot.

Finally in post production, as I was learning in the class exercises, by having a marked up script to go to when editing together the shots made that process so much quicker as well.

I guess the main negative that I found is that even though you save time on the shoot you gain time in pre-production, which is good for the crew but bad for you when you’re up in the early hours of the morning trying to finish the script before your shoot! It does also take away those few strikes of brilliance that you get when you’re actually on location, things you can only really think of when you’re there.

In conclusion, its probably best to use the pro’s of each style and morph them together in order to create a successful shoot.

 

Transmedia in the Marvel Cinematic Universe

*Spoiler Alert*

In this Post I will identify the key ideas of Transmedia, using the Marvel cinematic universe and their spin off television shows such as Agents of Shield, Agent Carter and the newly released Daredevil.

In its beginning Marvel made comic books, creating hundreds of characters being printed out to the page; today, Marvel not only continues to make comic books but has also translated their characters to other mediums such as movies and, even more recently, television shows. To make this Case study more specific I will only talk about one section known as the Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU). The concept for this began with movies, movies that are apart of a broader universe that tie into each others story lines, movies like Iron-man, Thor and Captain America. After such a great success Marvel studios took a turn to television. The problem they originally faced with the movies was that not every character was big enough to have their own movie, even though in the past these characters may have had their own comic book. By creating a television series the studio could still get the story out to the community of loyal MCU fans, but in a much cheaper way.

The specific thing to understand is that the Television shows are still apart of the MCU and is closely aligned with the events within it. For example, after The Avengers was released in cinemas the Television show Agents of Shield was directly linked to finding Alien content that had been left on earth from what occurred in the Avengers movie. As the series went on and more movies were released other correlations happened. When Thor the Dark Wold was released and cities were destroyed, the same cities were depicted in Agents of Shield. When Captain America the Winter Soldier was released and revealed that Shield was actually led by the Nazi devision Hydra, the Television show was once again directly effected.

Most recently Marvel Studios has turned to the online streaming service Netflix to release there most recent addition to the MCU, Daredevil. This show was released in the classic Netflix way, a series at a time.

This is a great example of Transmedia. Media that has been translated to fit different mediums. It would seem that companies have found out that this is a good money spinner as well, knowing that in order for the fans to keep up to date they must watch an increasing amount of media on different media platforms.

Television as we know it now has changed from beyond the tube, it is now seen on the internet and streaming devices and has a closer connection to cinema blockbusters and Marvel are using this cultural technology to broaden their horizons an encompass a bigger community following their MCU. Marvel isn’t the only one doing this either, you need only to look at their direct competitors DC comics to find a similar idea. DC has released plans to create the Justice League. The heroes with a bigger cult following like Batman and Superman have had their own movies, but the smaller heroes have opted for television shows like Arrow and The Flash, once again, all apart of the same universe.

All in all, transmedia media looks like the new thing to watch out for.

Last Week Tonight with John Oliver

In this post I will be analysing Last Week Tonight with John Oliver and how it’s content can be used as a cultural technology and create an encompassing community that goes beyond the borders of countries.

As an audience that is used to the normal codes and conventions of a news program I am able to understand the more intricate codes and conventions of  its satire. To satirise something, other then to poke fun at it, is to critique it, so that the right audience member might, in turn, understand the critique and become more knowledgable and questioning of a particular subject. Broadly speaking, culture is views and stances that the majority of people take within a group. By having such a democratic way of doing things, where people can voice opinions and views can change over time, culture is always evolving. By using the mass media of Television satirical shows like Last Week Tonight is able to bring forward perspectives and views that other shows can’t, they are able to push the envelope. In essence they are using the Technology of television in order to cultivate a positive culture.

Although the argument can be made that they’re just making jokes and poking fun, a lot of the shows content is actually about serious and concerning developments. One such topic is the appalling state of Sex Education in American schools. In this report punch lines are reached but some shocking numbers and facts are laid down as well. One of the stories that John Oliver did on the Daily show that granted him such recognition was a 3 part series on gun laws in America, once again a serious topic that evoked a wide spread discussion on the subject. By doing this the show is able to cross the line that many other serious news shows wouldn’t tend to cross. By making these revelations so entertaining also helps the information reach the masses.

In terms of a community beyond borders: the content is very important. Even though it is a show set in America and mainly for Americans there are many segments that reach out to different parts of the world which invite other people and other cultures to initiate into its community. The very first time I had heard of Last Week Tonight with John Oliver was when he did a special segment on Tony Abbott, the Australian Prime minister. Because this shows content extended out to my culture I then reached back to its culture, watching old episodes and other segments that interested me, keeping up with his new episodes as well. Its content invites people from other countries and other cultures to participate in the ongoing critique they have of society which, in turn, is what creates a better culture and unified world community. Of course this was only possible thanks to the internet. As technologies change, cultures change and the means in communication and discourse, such as television changes.

Class Reflection week 2-3

In Class for the past two weeks we have been working on the one project. Moving from writing and filming in week 2 to post production in week 3. I really enjoy post production but the main problem that I had is shifting from Final Cut Pro, my weapon of choice, to Premiere. Just having to get used to the different keyboard shortcuts tripped me up a little and made it stressful trying to work on an unfamiliar platform.

Everything else in class was straight forward enough, I will mention how important it was that I was there for the shoot, that way I knew what we were trying to get so when it came to post production there was no messing around about what shot goes where. In week 2 we were told to mark up our scripts with the different shots which made post super easy and not having to guess. We did, however, end up shooting different shots on the shoot as well just because we thought it looked better or interesting and hadn’t thought of it previously. I think that this is an important thought when thinking about the difference between the writer and the director, neither one knows exactly what the others thinking and once you actually put it on location and add the actors to the scene you can never really know what is going to work better than others. The main lesson here is to learn to be flexible.

One thing that we didn’t do, which we should’ve, was mark down the footage that was usable on a list so that when we went into post production we could easily choose which clips were usable and which ones weren’t. It would’ve just made the process a lot smoother than having to go through all the clips one at a time, often revisiting some, to choose the best.

Personal Exercise

For a bit of extra work I decided to find a script of one of my favourite movies and compare that to the final product and see what kind of things I can pick up from that. I decided to look at Animal Kingdom by David Michod as I have analysed this film very closely.

One of the first things that I noticed is how much of the story is lacking in the script. Not that this is a bad thing, it just goes to show how much you can actually do with a script, and it doesn’t necessarily tie you down too much. It’s interesting how much story I could pick up from the movie that wasn’t exactly defined in the script.

Having said that, the script’s dialogue is extremely similar to how the actors performed them, in the way and mood that was set by the script. When I was reading the main character J’s dialogue it came with the exact same performance that was given in the final film. Not to say that the performance wasn’t anything but incredible, but you could really feel what the character was like during the dialogue of the script.

Obviously the big problem with this is I know the movie and I know it well. It’s a benefit to see the difference however having already seen it I was always drawn back to the visuals when reading the script. If I were to read a script of a movie that I haven’t seen before it might be a different story and I might find out a few different things from this experiment.

I shall therefore endeavour to find a movie that I haven’t seen before, find the script and read it first before I watch the movie, hopefully I will have some more revelations!

Reflection after Wk 1

So far it has all been a bit hectic trying to get a grasp on what we are doing exactly in our studio. The exercises that we have done in the first week were really interesting though so instead I shall focus on that. In Class we were given a character and an action that we had to write a short scene on. My character was Antonius, a retired engineer that is building a man sized rocket in the back shed; and the action that I was given too match with that was that he was enjoying a delicious sandwich. Like the exercise we did before that, I just started writing down whatever was coming to my head, getting as much down as I could. Turns out I was writing a Spy style movie with Antonius trying to make it to the moon in his rocket, the scene was set at a Diner where he happened to be enjoying his sandwich.

After this we got into groups and read each others story out and decided which one we should turn into a script, the group decided that my one was the best to convert to script which I was pretty excited about because I had already started visualising the shots of the scene. Unfortunately looking a bit too far ahead in this case. We each wrote a script separately and brought it to the next class where we would collaborate with the Creative writing students in filming the small scene.

When filming the biggest thing that I found was that everybody had fairly different opinions and views on how the scene looked in their head. I had something completely different in mind to the next person, which was interesting and problematic. I think the main problem here is that there were no assigned job titles so there wasn’t a director that had the power to control the shoot. Every one kept on throwing in individual ideas which, as a collaboration was good, but without a specific director in charge it took us a very long time to film with tall the contributions happening.

We got asked at the start of the class whether we thought the groups were too big. I think they were from what I had seen in my group as some people had no jobs and had to wait around which wasn’t the most productive use of time.

The main things I learnt from this first week’s exercise is that writing is a lot easier if you have some seed of an idea to start with, such as the character that I was given. Collaboration during the writing process was also really good because it critiqued and made a better script with everyone adding their best parts to the scene then what I could’ve had on my own. When it came to the filming however it was a little confusing it terms of the collaboration and who was able to call the shots. Doubling in size probably didn’t help and because we were restricted with the amount of equipment we had to use a few people didn’t get to have a job for the shoot which wasn’t the best. I think next time there should be a list of positions that we assign to everyone so we know who can give direction and who needs to take direction, which will just make the whole shoot more smoother and economical.

What I Expect From This Course

This Course is called Writing for Film and Filming for Writing so I don’t think it is to far out their to believe that this course will include writing and filming, that much is for sure. I would think that we’d be looking into the industry and how it has been done as well as research and try new techniques of writing for film, and possibly even creating our own techniques.

What do I want out of the Studio? I would really like a lot of hands on experience in both writing and filming, especially doing the two together from start to finish. I would like to learn a lot more about the techniques and the styles that writers use to convey ideas for the film maker to interpret. As my background is in film I would like to focus more on learning about the writing and then just honing in on my skills as a film maker as I’m a lot more confident in that.

One of my main problems at the moment is writing down my ideas for films that I want to create in a way that people understand them and can see my vision. This is one thing that I hope to become better within this studio.

Something else I’m excited to do is to work with the creative writers that we’re going to be collaborating with. It will be a great experience looking through their work as well as showcasing my own to them. The thing that I’m most excited about is when the two groups can work to each others strengths to create something worth being proud of.

Hopefully some, if not all, of these expectations become a reality.

Mixed Media Essay

In Adrian Miles excerpt I have chosen to explore the following notion:

‘ What underlies such change, however, are the principles of distributed content production and sharing, folksonomies, trust networks and having access to skills that let you collate and build’.

I wish specifically to explore the way that Folksonomies have changed the way that we conduct ourselves, and how learning to master them is helpful in my future career. Folksonomies, otherwise broadly known as tagging, is a feature in Web 2.0 that has really changed the way that we conduct ourselves online, both socially and economically. “Tagging is a promising informal and simple mechanism to collaboratively add (mostly incomplete) order to a wealth of data, objects and resources” (Derntl et al. 2011). I have specifically set out my essay in separate blog posts to demonstrate to you how tagging works and how useful it can be. Each separate blog posts has a number of tags that connect themselves to other posts that have similar information; for instance there might be a blog post about the history of folksonomy, with a tag of “history of folksonomy” if you were to click on that tag then all other blog posts with a similar topic will collate themselves together. There is also a main tag that connects all these blog posts so that you may read the essay in its entirety before shifting it around with other tags, something I suggest the reader should do.