Move to Think

So, maybe I should have done dance? Well, I did other sports so that probably doesn’t matter. Regardless, the story of the ballet dancer in our YouTube-videos-slash-lecture fascinated me. I wonder if there is some context in which I’m higher functioning, hopefully that doesn’t involve mushrooms (but I’m open to try anything).

As with the lectures themselves, these videos were mostly about how normal pedagogy fails to engage with its students, and I’m getting pretty tired of this topic. At least the Web 2.0 video talked about something different; hypertext. Um… Well, ok. ‘Revolutionary’ educational techniques and hypertext. Is there nothing else to this subject?

I’m deathly serious here.

Ok, one aspect – or rather, word – in video three interested me; anthropology. Anthropology was actually my first real hobby, not even joking. I’m no expert – I was more of a biological anthropologist – but the cultural side really intrigued me. I hadn’t really considered looking at the Internet age in terms of social evolution on an offline level. Of course, the readings have all gone on about how the Internet changed the world and will further change it, but rarely, if ever, do they mention how it will affect humanity.

People are becoming simultaneously interpersonal and interpersonal. The middle video raised the point of how media has mass-reaching potential, which, you know… Duh. But anyway, it means that we no longer have to leave our homes or even our beds to seek out new knowledge and experiences. ‘It takes a village’, yes, but now that village can be cyber. It doesn’t even have to be people anymore. Self-help sites, robotic GPs, YouTube, children today are raised by their parents and the Internet. My three-year old nephew can use an iPhone.

That’s scary. I’m frightened by this.

But, it does get people – kids – to learn formative lessons in their own way. At that age we don’t surf the web unless we are enjoying it, and unless we are on Facebook chatting with our friends (side note, my SIX MONTH old nephew has a Facebook account) we are learning things. Doesn’t matter if we’re learning something academic like maths or grammar, or whether we are studying something cultural like our favourite TV show or the history of Czechoslovakia, we are engaging in self-motivated education. For children, this makes the Internet a surrogate parent/teacher. All it lacks is love, though really, if you search hard enough you can find love on the Internet.

But what the Internet allows us to do is learn in ways WE want to. These days, as – what I have decided I am within the last few hours – a kinesthetic learner, I can pace around my room, with my iPad, learning. Hell, I could do a cartwheel while listening to a podcast. Extreme learning! It’s possible today!

Unlectures

This week (30/7/13) we attended the second unlecture of 2013. It was… fun?

I am a horribly negative person.

It was a nifty idea to spend the time answering questions we had rather than ones that the lecturer assumed we had, but I couldn’t help but notice that my question wasn’t answered.

I am a self-centred person.

My question – and I admit it wasn’t phrased well – was ‘Why should we attend the unlecture if the content is completely irrelevant’ or something to that effect. You see, I had been trying to put my thoughts into words when the lady-tutor came around looking for our questions, so I had to quickly write down a brief version of my thoughts and hope that it was close to my original intent.

I am an unorganised person.

Mr. Miles seems to imply that the way that the lectures are run is completely malleable in that it will change according to what we, as students, desire, and what he believes will best benefit us. This is intriguing as it doesn’t really represent a curriculum very well. They clearly don’t have anything particularly concrete to teach us, because they’ve basically said ‘let’s have a lecture where we do jack-all and mess with conventional teaching by not actually teaching things’. No offence. Ok, so we are learning about other methods of pedagogy – or rather, andragogy – but how is that going to help media kids? Or prof comm kids? Why do we have to come to these lectures, what is their purpose? I get that you are demonstrating the nature of the subject matter – the ever-evolving online world – but it’s a little bit meta-referential and I don’t like taking one concept of the subject and using it to dictate the way it is taught.

I am a confused person.

My plan is to attend every ‘unlecture’. Admittedly, they are the least boring lectures I have, which is perhaps the goal, but I don’t overly enjoy them. I’m not great at change, so when someone chucks something old and normal at me in a weird, original way I am liable to have a full on anxiety attack. I fled the first lecture the second Mr. Miles said it wasn’t rude anymore.

I am an antsy person.

So, do they have anything to tell us in the ‘unlectures’? Is it relevant to anything we are likely to do outside of university? Is it really that different from a normal lecture, except that computers aren’t allowed, they don’t try to actually teach us anything concrete and that we keep being told it isn’t a normal lecture? I said I’ll always be there, and I made an oath not to give up with warning, but… why?

I am a tired person.