Reflections Off a Mirror

Just another Media Factory site

Category: workshop (page 2 of 2)

Project Brief 3 (A Tongue to Speak) Reflective Post – Week #7

WARNING! Long Entry Ahead 

Having to shoot in an outdoor environment comes with the need for permits and notices. Thankfully, the scale of this production was rather small (mainly consisting of a tripod and a Sony MC50) and a manpower of only 1 (myself). From this assignment, I gathered that we actually don’t need a permit from the city of Melbourne, however we are still required to provide a proof of insurance from RMIT University, therefore there was a need to fill up a simple form that’s called “Low Impact Filming” and email it to the city of Melbourne, Strategic Planning and Logistic Team – Filming, and await their confirmation email. Some guidelines as to what is considered a “low impact filming” are also attached to that email as well as some house rules that should be observed during the time of filming along the streets.

I thought of the title “A Tongue to Speak” playing on the pun of the word ‘tongue’. It carries 2 meanings where a tongue is used to eat, speak or anything related to the oral form. The other meaning is a synonym for ‘language’ like a mother tongue where it is a native language or a first language usually used only at home with family members. And since my film is about the unofficial dialect we have back home in Singapore, “Singlish”, and I had my subject talking about the food back home, it is only appropriate to use the word ‘Tongue’ and the play on the pun.

It is never easy when you want to film, record, or even just to take photos of another person. There’s a need to arrange a suitable time where all parties are available for a couple of hours, as you can never be sure how long you might take to cover everything that is required to be filmed on that day. Therefore a rough schedule and time checks in between is handy to keep us on track and not drift away from our main point and not digress on external topics like what we had for lunch… Another problem faced was also arranging the right time and place to film my subject carrying out some daily routines that she would normally go through like cooking, cleaning, going through her assignments and more. Being a student at the University of Melbourne, her main priorities are assignments and catching up on readings, therefore to find the time to sit down for a small chat over a cup of coffee already seemed quite a far fetch. Eventually, I managed to grab the video camera, and tripod and rushed over to her apartment when she told me she’s going to cook her dinner. I was fortunate enough that I still had the Sony MC50 and tripod on loan, and managed to shoot that whole sequence on that.

thumb_IMG_7145_1024

The entire interview and as mentioned above, the cooking scene, were shot on the Sony MC50 with a tripod. It was a challenge finding the right position for my subject and because the sofa was located right next to a window, I was getting really really harsh lighting over my subject. As you can see from the picture above, the entire right side of the picture is blanked out from the bright light that was coming in. As a remedy, I hung a few pieces of white clothing across the window to soften the light casting over my subject. I didn’t want to shut the blinds completely, as it would have been too dark. So that’s a little learning opportunity of controlling light, although maybe not professionally, but it still does the job.

thumb_IMG_7146_1024

The above picture illustrates the window being right next to the sofa where my subject was sitting. 

I struggled with how I wanted to frame my subject, having no background experience what-so-ever on how to film on a video camera and therefore it was a very fresh and new experience on handling the camera having to zoom, pan, with or without tripod, and so on. I was considering whether to have my subject dead center in the frame and have her speaking to the camera, or, have her on the side of the frame and pretend that she’s speaking to someone behind the camera slightly off center. I decided to go with the latter, as it just seemed more natural and it allows to show some side profile of my subject rather than having her face dead center, it may seem a little too two-dimensional. Another thing I’m glad I didn’t went on dead center was the fact that I had extra space on my subject’s left to insert texts and images, it’s almost like a useful spatial tool. And you could say it was serendipity that my subject’s highlights of her hair almost kind of matches the colour of the sofa, and I found that easy on the eyes.

During the editing process I had a rough idea of a shape I wanted my film to take. I didn’t see the need for a narration and also didn’t like the idea of having the interview question and answer segment to be part of the film. Hence, I had to slice up everything according to my subject’s answers and the topic that we were talking about, and eliminate my voice when I was asking the questions. Next was to arrange her answers in a way to create some sort of flow like she is telling a story my viewers for them to sink their teeth into. If I were to just have her answers in the order they were in the interview, in my opinion, would seem a little too jumbled and over the place. And since I removed my voice of asking the question, it was a bit of a challenge to convey the question to my viewer before they can understand my subject’s answer, but I managed to work my way around that. Therefore, I believe that the flow and the arrangement of my subject’s answers and her thoughts are critical to this film in order to keep my viewer’s attention.

One of the major challenges I faced while editing was that I had way too much content and I had to keep it under 3 minutes. I was really reluctant to cut out some parts of the sequence, but it had to be done in order to meet the project brief’s requirements. Like in my last project brief, I carelessly exceeded the time limit by 40% and the lecturer who marked my project brief 2 wasn’t too pleased with that. Therefore, for this project brief, I tried my best to trim my film to under 3 minutes in hopes of meeting all the requirements for this assignment.

I did a little colouring for the interview shots of the film. Just had a go with the colour wheels on Adobe Premiere Pro colouring tap. Below are the before and after shots.

Screen Shot 2016-04-19 at 2.50.24 PM Screen Shot 2016-04-19 at 2.50.33 PM

Before                                                                                      After

I attempted to soften the lighting and cool the whites as you can see that the light form the windows is still a little hard on my subject. Like my filming skills, I have no background on colouring as well, and would definitely love to go more in depth on the whole process like editing. Something I would put some time aside and go through the many tutorials being up on lynda.com.

Overall, as stated in my earlier posts, I think I am pleased with the end outcome of this assignment. And would like to have a much desired rest over the next couple of days before we start off again for the next Project Brief, which I heard is quite substantial as compared to the ones that have been done before. Looking forward to that with mixed feelings.

 

 

Project Brief 3 (A Tongue to Speak) – Week #7

At last! Another project brief is down and I’m quite happy with the outcome of this assignment. We were given quite a fair bit of time to approach this assignment, probably due to the necessary planning and administrative matters that needs to be settled before any physical work could be done. Planning, planning, planning. A little goes a long way and you never know when 1 of the many plans that you have made might fail, hence having another long list of backup plans is always handy.

 

Narrative Structure Exercise – Week #6

In this week’s workshop, we were given a list of questions that we should be asking ourselves before we actually head out to shoot our interview projects for Project Brief 3, which happens to be the heat of the subject for most of us Media 1 students for the most of this week and the upcoming one too. As the saying goes, “If you fail to plan, you plan to fail.”. Can’t say I fully agree with that, but it definitely holds some strong values.

Here I go…

  1. What is the ‘controlling idea’ (Robert McKee) of your portrait?
    Ans: I was thinking of a working title for my Project Brief 3, and so far I’m going for “A Tongue to Speak”, and it is about this unofficial language that we use back home in Singapore, and everyone is so accustom to talking like that till it almost becomes like a dialect or an accent.
  2. How is your portrait film structured?
    Ans: I haven’t really thought of a formal structure for it yet, but for now it starts off as Q&A with onscreen texts for the question and I have my subject replying to them. Therefore it does not require the presence of an interviewer, although during the shoot, I took the role of the interviewer, but I found it complicated to have several shots of the interviewer and interviewee, cutting it, and with the constraints of having just 1 camera, it would have taken up a lot of time shooting and less time to edit.
  3. What do you want your audience to make of your interviewee?
    Ans: To convey some information and culture to my audience on the tongue that we speak back home, “Singlish”, and how it came about, how do we use it, and even from a cultural context on how it has evolved and came a long way to where it is today.
  4. How is your portrait being narrated?
    Ans: I don’t think there’ll be any narration for my portrait, I’ll just let my interviewee do most of the speaking with some visual aid through texts for certain questions that I might have prompted during the interview session with my subject. I opt not having any narration as I thought it would have seemed a little too documentary-like and it would also require having to record voice overs of myself which I am not too comfortable about, hence end up doing many takes which would be too time consuming.
  5. What role will the ‘found footage’ play in your portrait?
    Ans: I plan to use the element of music as a found footage,  just to create the mood and uplift the entire short film. Music definitely aids in creating a scene for the audience even before they are exposed to the visual aspect of the film. I once heard of this saying, “A picture paints a thousand words, but a song paints a thousand pictures”.
  6. Does your portrait have a dramatic turning point?
    Ans: Unfortunately, no, given the topic that I am conveying to my audience, I don’t see the need for a dramatic turning point. Probably the most dramatic moment of the film would be my subject moving away from home, but that’s as dramatic as it gets.
  7. When does this turning point in your portrait and why?
    Ans: It occurs midway through or maybe towards at the end where my subject reveals her identity and what she’s doing here in Melbourne.
  8. How does your portrait gather and maintain momentum?
    Ans: It starts off with a simple Q&A and then we digress into speaking more about specific topics relating to Singapore food culture and the unofficial language we speak back home, “Singlish”.
  9. Where will your portrait’s dramatic tension come from?
    Ans: Just the tension of speaking a little more refined and articulate a little better when my subject is speaking with the locals here as compared to being back home where we can open the flood gates for “Singlish”.
  10. Does the portrait have a climax and/or resolution?
    Ans: Yes, I strongly believe there is a resolution, and that comes when my subject reveals more about herself instead of talking about the Singapore culture in general.

MC50 Interview Exercise – #Week 5

So here it is, the final cut of A Survival Guide to Survive The First 6 Weeks of Uni.

Initially I had no clue how am I going to edit this to make it seem like it was an interview, as due to our negligence we overlooked the part where there need to be one of us asking the question and 2 others answering it. However, I there was a clip of one of my group mates, Reza, repeating the question to himself, and I thought that would make a very good shot of somebody asking the question. And hence, I decided on that to be the opening shot for the viewers to understand what’s this video is all about and would not need to repeat the question along the way as all of us are talking about the same thing, therefore this helps to shorten the duration of the video instead of having the question being asked over and over again to different individuals.

I decided to add in some humour as well, by having some shots that were of Reza trying to gather himself before answering the question. As usual, some people might need to take some time to adjust themselves to feel comfortable and confident in front of the camera. I, myself, had problems speaking directly to the camera, and decided to make it seem like I was speaking to someone else behind the camera in stead of speaking to the camera to overcome that sense of nervousness.

After getting started on editing, I realised the shots I wanted, and slowly got a sense of direction of where I want to go with this short video. Despite it being a “serious” topic of how to survive in uni, I thought the element of humour in between shots would help lighten the mood as well as to give the viewer some good laughs. As a group that went out to shoot the raw footages, I thought we had fun too, and would like to convey that as well through the video on top of having such a serious topic.

Overall, I thought it was a good exercise for us to experiment on the Sony MC50 as well as how to use a tripod before we head out to start on our own recording for Project Brief 3. As mentioned in my previous post, there were some challenges we had to face with the technical side of things, but we managed to work our way around it and was soon enlightened on the problems we had when we head back into class. Look forward to working more as a group for future exercises and assignments as well as getting to know the camera more.

A Survival Guide to First 6 Weeks of Uni – Week #5

During this week’s workshop we were given this exercise and were taught how to use the Sony MC50 as well as how to use a tripod. Yes, it may seem quite fundamental, but it is just going through the formality of explaining how everything works so that everyone’s got a good understanding and that we’re all  on the same page. Besides, it serves as a good refresher for those who might already have worked on a Sony MC5, or something similar, as well as using a tripod. The exercise requires us to head out to record 2 interviewees and an interviewer, and some wide shots and cutaways. We had a little directional microphone attached to the top of the camera to pick up the audio from whatever the camera is pointing to.

20160406_110145

From the picture above as you can see that little red knob is slanted and the 3 of us who were grouped randomly by our tutor had a hard time scratching our heads on how to adjust that red knob to be flat. Despite getting the bubble dead center, the visuals wouldn’t be straight on the screen, or in technical terms, it would have appeared canted. However, despite having that problem, we decided to work our way around that and just adjusted the camera till we got a relatively level image on the screen and didn’t touch the settings on the tripod, except for folding the legs in while we were moving from location to location. Overall we managed to shoot what was required in the exercise brief and most importantly had fun taking up the different roles of being the interviewer, interviewee and the guy who stands behind the camera to press the little red button and gesture to the subject that we’re recording…

Other little minor hiccups we encountered were trying to find the right location around RMIT’s building 80. Since it was raining outside and we didn’t have that much time to run out to other venues, we decided to just find little pockets of the building where it was quiet and were not crowded. Obviously, some were taken up by other Media 1 groups doing the same exercise, but it was all good, there was enough space to go round.

After gathering all our raw footages around building 80, we transferred the files into our computers where we could edit and create a sequence from there. I’ve done a rough cut, but might want to fine tune it a little more before rendering and exporting it out into a final cut.

In a nutshell, I think it was a good exercise for us to get our hands on the little Sony MC50 which served as a good prequel to what’s to come in future assignments and exercises when working in the different studios. Oh and we did raise the issue we had over the tripod to our tutor, and she managed to find the nut that was locked and prevented the red knob from moving, so in future, when it comes to using the tripod, I think I would be more versed in doing so.

 

The Right Questions – Week #5

I am actually quite excited in getting my hands dirty for Project Brief 3. At this very moment, I have not really started on anything solid, but I have a very good idea on what I’ll be doing for the 1-2 minutes long video. Don’t want to spoil anything for anyone, but I am really looking forward to getting down to the actual production and recording process of my subject and the topics that we are going to cover.

In this week’s workshop, we were taught how to ask questions. And not just any ol’questions, questions that actually grab your audience attention and keep them wanting to know more. I try to keep myself in the audience’s shoes while I was brainstorming for questions that I intend to ask my subject. And I realised this phrase kept popping up in my mind, “And then? And then? And then? And then?”. It is just the fear of not asking enough to sieve out the answers and information I need to keep my audience attention in check. In newscasting there is the “grab” where it catches the attention of the viewer, and usually the “grab” only lasts 3 seconds before you loses the viewer’s attention. Therefore, in order to keep my audience’s attention, I would have to come up with good questions and not just a generic yes or no question for my subject. (Am still brainstorming questions).

As mention above, I’m still very much in the pre-production stage where I’m mainly planning and brainstorming ideas for the entire project. And location has been one of the main things to cover. Since it’s an interview, it should take place in somewhere quiet, where I can record the audio on a separate track and mix it into the sequence if I want to. If I were to do the interview in a crowded area or a place out in the open, whatever audible sound that is not my subject’s voice might bleed into the microphone, and I might have a hard time mixing or getting rid of that in post. Would want to have a big reminder on that, because it’s so easy to overlook that when I have my main focus on the visuals.

Speaking of visuals, there is a torrent of possibilities to carry out an interview, there is the person to person interview, the voice over (where you don’t see the interviewee, just a voice over some visuals), or just the interviewee speaking, and more. One tip that I got from this week’s lectorial was to get the subject to repeat the question in their answer. So if I asked what did you have for breakfast. Instead of my subject saying, “I had bacon and eggs…”, I should get them to say, “What I had for breakfast was bacon and eggs.”. And that would help so much in editing the film later. I would then have the option of including me, the interviewer, in the sequence, or just have my interviewee speaking on the topic. I have not really decided whether I should stick to one or have a mix of both, so I’ll need to consider that before I go into post production.

Another thing I was considering was the song choice or whether to even have a backing music throughout the sequence. But I realised, I would discover that along the way during post production, since I don’t have a hard and solid sequence yet. It would be good to have music to lift things and set the mood, but it might be a distraction for the audience. As mentioned during one of the workshops, while doing an interview or documentary, it is always good to have an instrumental track playing in the background while the interviewee is speaking so as to avoid any clashing with the vocals of a song that might have lyrics in it, so I’ll look out for that.

In a nutshell, I think I’m good to go, and now only thing’s stopping me is arranging a suitable time for my subject to be available for a shoot, but that’s being sorted out as I write this post. So I’m having my fingers crossed…

Project Brief 2 – Reflective Post – Week #4

This assignment pretty much marks the start to what’s more to come in the coming weeks ahead. Weekly assignments as well as the major assessments.

Having said that, I’m quite happy with what I managed to churn out from the limited skills I’ve acquired from watching video tutorials on Lynda.com, which I might add are really informative and detailed. Further problems that I might have encountered, I just googled the issue or typed it into the search bar of YouTube. Like what my tutor mentioned in class last week, “Whatever you’re experiencing now, know that somewhere in another corner of the planet has been through it before.”. That’s quite a power message, not just learning how to edit on Adobe Premiere Pro, but I guess it applies to life in general as well. You never know somebody’s background or what they’ve been through until they opened up to you…

Back to point, I had a little brainstorming session with myself during class time in the middle of week #3’s workshop. Started churning out ideas onto my notepad and came to nothing. However, I knew I had to get it done at the end of the day and I needed to show something, so I started on recording my daily routines, like making coffee, walking along the streets, doing laundry, cooking (which didn’t make the final cut), and so on. It’s rather challenging to do a self portrait video that represents yourself when most of the things that represents you are back home, with the exception of a few items like my tennis rackets.

After getting all my raw footages, still photos, and some recordings of daily activities, got down to business to editing. It’s probably my very first time editing on Adobe Premiere Pro if you exclude the “Haiku Exercise”, as that was more like a warmup exercise than an actual assignment. It was quite intimidating at first, but once I got a hang of things and organising my work files, I realised a certain flow from importing files to cropping and trimming to adjusting the scale and positioning as well as adding text. Once all that have been covered, there was more room for creativity on how I select my shots and which pictures to include into the sequence and how certain things are arranged and place. For audio wise, I decided to go with a more stripped and minimalist approach, not trying to go all out coming from an music and audio technology background, it was so easy to go overboard by turning this assignment more into a short 1 minute music video. Instead, I recorded some everyday sounds of water flowing, like being in the shower and flushing of the toilet bowl, and the sounds of clock ticking. It became more of a timbre-centric piece than anything else. I feel that takes my film away from having the common background music to accompany moving images and pictures.

I decided on the title “Out In the Open with Time”, as I believe if I wanted to tell a story, I would tell it through Time, as time has no boundaries, but at the same time, time restricts and constraints. And my story is about how I spend my time after having to move away from home to pursue a degree, and to some that’s like going out on your own, hence going “out in the open”.

What worked in the film? I really liked the opening titles on how the steam from the hot water from making coffee created a blanket for the text to sit and then slowly fade away. I decided to reverse that footage, as it was cool to watch how the coffee and sugar dissolved into the hot water in reverse and it suits the opening titles, otherwise, the steam wouldn’t have appeared first, but me pouring the hot water into the cup. Another thing I thought worked very well was the split screens for the scene showing people crossing the road and cars on the street shot from above street level. Instead of showing individual scenes in full scale, I decided to do it in split screen, but scaled down, as I think they were both have the same function of stating my point that time is everywhere, whether we notice it or not. It also help saves time, instead of cutting from shot to shot.

What didn’t work in the film? It was definitely a challenge to create flow and linking everything together. Without a clear plan of what was I doing, it could just turn out to a video collage of random pictures of my coffee, laundry, tennis rackets and people walking along the streets, and my mates having a game at the tennis court. I thought the concept was very important and it was hard trying to link everything together, which I hope I managed to deliver the message to the viewer.

Overall, it was a good first assignment, getting to know Adobe Premiere Pro and maybe getting to know myself a little better.

 

The “Hat Session” – Practical Reflection – Week #2

Week 2’s Media 1 workshop started off with a little presentation on our “Melbourne Moment” photos. Each of us had to stand up and say a few things about our pictures and why did we choose that particular picture to signify a “Melbourne Moment”.

Thereafter, we proceeded to having a little group discussion on our Project Brief 1 Lofi Media Self Portrait. We were taught about the 6 hats and different members of the group were assigned a different coloured “hat” to critique or feedback an individual’s work within the group. I thought it was a clever way to classify different criticisms or comments or praises. However, having a specific “hat” worn by a someone isn’t really fair, as that person is only allow to critique base on whatever “hat” he’s wearing. For example if I was given the Black hat, I am only limited to saying the negatives or what didn’t work for that particular artefact. But what if it’s not in my nature to fault somebody? Which in some cases being the being the “bad guy”. Hence, having just a fixed coloured “hat” really limits the way you approach onto looking at somebody’s piece of work.

Another way to approach using this 6 hats would be each person can have 1 comment on the piece of work using the various coloured hats, so that way we can have a view from different perspectives, or in this case, different coloured hats. I would guess that would have a more opened discussion and broader ideas, but would require a fair bit of time since everyone’s using the different coloured hats instead being assigned 1.

Overall, we all had fun and it was good having feedbacks, comments, criticisms coming from my fellow group mates, and I would definitely go back to the drawing board to refine my work.

Newer posts
Skip to toolbar