Reflections Off a Mirror

Just another Media Factory site

Category: Production (page 2 of 3)

Narrative – Week #7

Narrative and story telling has been taught throughout all stages of education from kindergarten through to tertiary. Back home in Singapore, we would be taught how to write English composition essays, and it could be based on a personal account or just made up on the spot. This week’s readings however, goes in depth from both viewer and filmmaker’s point of view on how various narrative techniques can deliver the same story, but in a different experience, or in other words, a different plot.

It is common for one to mix up the definition of plot and story to be the same thing, however, Boredwell and Thompson goes on to explain the fine line between the two words. From the reading, I gathered that there can be different ways to present a story. Quoting the Alfred Hitchcock example that Boredwell and Thompson used in the reading about the bomb under the table and how you could let the viewer know that there is a bomb that is under the table or just wait for it to go off and bring out the element of surprise to the viewers. That is one of the many techniques a filmmaker may use to deliver the same outcome but would cause a different reaction from the viewer. The technique used here to let the viewers know about bomb going off is known as unrestricted narration, contrary to that would be restricted narration where, like the characters in the scene, the audience are unaware of the bomb ticking. What drives the story would be a strong plot and what makes a strong plot is the decisions that the filmmaker made during pre-production, production, and post-production.

An Australian film was screened this week, Mystery Road. To my memory, I think this was the first Australian film I’ve watched to date, and I must say it was rather laid back and paced at a slower tempo. Which is kind of ironic as this film is a murder mystery story, and usually films or even TV series that takes on that genre would have a generally fast pace, fast cutting and some action scenes happening. However, there were still some similarities to draw from Mystery Road, which is the the filmmaker keeping the depth of story information objective. As mentioned in the reading by Boredwell and Thompson, film narration manipulates not just the range of knowledge, but the depth of knowledge as well, and this can be split into 2, objective or subjective. Objective is where we are confined only to whatever that is being conveyed from the character’s action or interaction with other characters. This is used to withhold information from the viewer’s and to keep the viewers curious on how the investigation is going to be carried out and find out who might be the culprit. The other end of the spectrum would be subjective where the filmmaker allows the viewers to hear the internal voice of a character, an internal monologue, or to see the inner images, like a flashback. Depending on how the filmmaker wants to convey a certain message, the filmmaker have to make a decision whether to go subjective or objective, restricted or unrestricted.

Project Brief 3 (A Tongue to Speak) Reflective Post – Week #7

WARNING! Long Entry Ahead 

Having to shoot in an outdoor environment comes with the need for permits and notices. Thankfully, the scale of this production was rather small (mainly consisting of a tripod and a Sony MC50) and a manpower of only 1 (myself). From this assignment, I gathered that we actually don’t need a permit from the city of Melbourne, however we are still required to provide a proof of insurance from RMIT University, therefore there was a need to fill up a simple form that’s called “Low Impact Filming” and email it to the city of Melbourne, Strategic Planning and Logistic Team – Filming, and await their confirmation email. Some guidelines as to what is considered a “low impact filming” are also attached to that email as well as some house rules that should be observed during the time of filming along the streets.

I thought of the title “A Tongue to Speak” playing on the pun of the word ‘tongue’. It carries 2 meanings where a tongue is used to eat, speak or anything related to the oral form. The other meaning is a synonym for ‘language’ like a mother tongue where it is a native language or a first language usually used only at home with family members. And since my film is about the unofficial dialect we have back home in Singapore, “Singlish”, and I had my subject talking about the food back home, it is only appropriate to use the word ‘Tongue’ and the play on the pun.

It is never easy when you want to film, record, or even just to take photos of another person. There’s a need to arrange a suitable time where all parties are available for a couple of hours, as you can never be sure how long you might take to cover everything that is required to be filmed on that day. Therefore a rough schedule and time checks in between is handy to keep us on track and not drift away from our main point and not digress on external topics like what we had for lunch… Another problem faced was also arranging the right time and place to film my subject carrying out some daily routines that she would normally go through like cooking, cleaning, going through her assignments and more. Being a student at the University of Melbourne, her main priorities are assignments and catching up on readings, therefore to find the time to sit down for a small chat over a cup of coffee already seemed quite a far fetch. Eventually, I managed to grab the video camera, and tripod and rushed over to her apartment when she told me she’s going to cook her dinner. I was fortunate enough that I still had the Sony MC50 and tripod on loan, and managed to shoot that whole sequence on that.

thumb_IMG_7145_1024

The entire interview and as mentioned above, the cooking scene, were shot on the Sony MC50 with a tripod. It was a challenge finding the right position for my subject and because the sofa was located right next to a window, I was getting really really harsh lighting over my subject. As you can see from the picture above, the entire right side of the picture is blanked out from the bright light that was coming in. As a remedy, I hung a few pieces of white clothing across the window to soften the light casting over my subject. I didn’t want to shut the blinds completely, as it would have been too dark. So that’s a little learning opportunity of controlling light, although maybe not professionally, but it still does the job.

thumb_IMG_7146_1024

The above picture illustrates the window being right next to the sofa where my subject was sitting. 

I struggled with how I wanted to frame my subject, having no background experience what-so-ever on how to film on a video camera and therefore it was a very fresh and new experience on handling the camera having to zoom, pan, with or without tripod, and so on. I was considering whether to have my subject dead center in the frame and have her speaking to the camera, or, have her on the side of the frame and pretend that she’s speaking to someone behind the camera slightly off center. I decided to go with the latter, as it just seemed more natural and it allows to show some side profile of my subject rather than having her face dead center, it may seem a little too two-dimensional. Another thing I’m glad I didn’t went on dead center was the fact that I had extra space on my subject’s left to insert texts and images, it’s almost like a useful spatial tool. And you could say it was serendipity that my subject’s highlights of her hair almost kind of matches the colour of the sofa, and I found that easy on the eyes.

During the editing process I had a rough idea of a shape I wanted my film to take. I didn’t see the need for a narration and also didn’t like the idea of having the interview question and answer segment to be part of the film. Hence, I had to slice up everything according to my subject’s answers and the topic that we were talking about, and eliminate my voice when I was asking the questions. Next was to arrange her answers in a way to create some sort of flow like she is telling a story my viewers for them to sink their teeth into. If I were to just have her answers in the order they were in the interview, in my opinion, would seem a little too jumbled and over the place. And since I removed my voice of asking the question, it was a bit of a challenge to convey the question to my viewer before they can understand my subject’s answer, but I managed to work my way around that. Therefore, I believe that the flow and the arrangement of my subject’s answers and her thoughts are critical to this film in order to keep my viewer’s attention.

One of the major challenges I faced while editing was that I had way too much content and I had to keep it under 3 minutes. I was really reluctant to cut out some parts of the sequence, but it had to be done in order to meet the project brief’s requirements. Like in my last project brief, I carelessly exceeded the time limit by 40% and the lecturer who marked my project brief 2 wasn’t too pleased with that. Therefore, for this project brief, I tried my best to trim my film to under 3 minutes in hopes of meeting all the requirements for this assignment.

I did a little colouring for the interview shots of the film. Just had a go with the colour wheels on Adobe Premiere Pro colouring tap. Below are the before and after shots.

Screen Shot 2016-04-19 at 2.50.24 PM Screen Shot 2016-04-19 at 2.50.33 PM

Before                                                                                      After

I attempted to soften the lighting and cool the whites as you can see that the light form the windows is still a little hard on my subject. Like my filming skills, I have no background on colouring as well, and would definitely love to go more in depth on the whole process like editing. Something I would put some time aside and go through the many tutorials being up on lynda.com.

Overall, as stated in my earlier posts, I think I am pleased with the end outcome of this assignment. And would like to have a much desired rest over the next couple of days before we start off again for the next Project Brief, which I heard is quite substantial as compared to the ones that have been done before. Looking forward to that with mixed feelings.

 

 

Project Brief 3 (A Tongue to Speak) – Week #7

At last! Another project brief is down and I’m quite happy with the outcome of this assignment. We were given quite a fair bit of time to approach this assignment, probably due to the necessary planning and administrative matters that needs to be settled before any physical work could be done. Planning, planning, planning. A little goes a long way and you never know when 1 of the many plans that you have made might fail, hence having another long list of backup plans is always handy.

 

Project Brief Web Synopsis – Week #7

A Tongue to Speak

The title of this blog entry says it all.

Here’s a synopsis of my video portrait of a Singaporean living in Melbourne.

Rock-umentary – Week #6

This week’s lectorial we were given little segments of scenes from the rock documentary “Mistaken for Strangers”. Personally, I am a big fan of the whole rock genre (which guy isn’t?), and I have always enjoyed watching documentary of music in general, not just about rock. Amy, Montage of Heck, It Might Get Loud and more are some of the all time favourites. But this rock-cumentary that I’m about to mention would be by far the most influential and inspiring, in my opinion, and that is Foo Fighter’s Back and Forth.

I’ve probably mentioned this before in my earlier posts (or not), but I am a huge Foo Fighters fan, like massively huge. And Dave Grohl (Frontman and lead singer of the Foo Fighters) is just a name that never fails to impress and just keep extending the yard stick by miles and miles. But all things considered, he’s still one of the most humble musicians in the world and probably as casual and layman as you can ever get which makes you wonder how has he made it this far and still carries such a laid back persona of not being arrogant, not living the material world, and inspiring kids to pick up the guitar and start a rock band some day.

If anyone was a rock fan or who listens to the Foo Fighters, I would highly recommend this film. It brings fans, old and new, up to speed from the death of Kurt Cobain and the disband of Nirvana, to their latest album (at the time this film was released), Wasting Light, on all the different lineups, episodes, politics and how they recorded Wasting Light right from Dave’s garage in stead of their very own state of the art studio out in the dessert, studio 606, and how Dave insisted on recording everything on tape.

On a side note, I decided to take on this film’s “interview” style for Project Brief 3, where there is only the subject talking without the aid of having a narrator. Having it more of a storytelling session rather than a 1 to 1 interview session as how I did it on the actual day of the shoot.

Editing – Week #6

Editing has been always a keen interest of mine since I started studying about media and film production. It is at the filmmaker’s disposal to arrange the shots and when to cut, fade, dissolve or wipe. The possibilities on how to edit a film is endless and it is based on an individual and how he visions the sequence of the film should be. Like what Boredwell and Thompson mentioned in the reading, it can shape the response of the viewer and the decisions can build film form.

The cut is the most common tool when it comes to joining 2 shots to form a sequence. As mentioned by one of the students from class, editing with the cut is almost like the blinking of an eye. It provides some change from a particular shot to another. Sometimes, a scene might have gone on for some time and it might seem a little too unnatural as there are no cuts in between. We as human have to blink our eyes every now and then, and the cut sort of simulates that in editing to keep the audience interested as well as anchored to the film. The cut also creates emphasis on a particular scene.

In the film that was screened this week, Enemy of the State, where it is a typical Hollywood action packed movie, exhibits many a wide variety of editing. We see, as in many action movies, many fast cutting scenes during the chase sequence between the federal agents and the IT man who happened to have gain possession of a video that shows the assassination of the Congressman Hammersley. Obviously during a foot chase, there is a lot of things going on and it all captures at different angles, locations, with different point of view from both the protagonist and antagonist, not to mention medium to close ups shot of the characters running. Therefore, it is only natural to have fast cutting scenes in order to fit all these into one sequence, with the occasional panoramic view of the setting where the foot chase is taking place.

The film also exhibits crosscutting, where it creates 2 different scenes that may or may not be happening concurrently. In this case, during that same foot chase scene, we see our main character, Robert Clayton Dean, (Will Smith) in a lingerie shop buying a gift for his wife. And eventually the 2 scenes meet when the young IT man meets Robert and plants the tape containing the video of the assassination into one of Robert’s shopping bag. This introduces some spatial discontinuity at the beginning, but resolves when both characters meet each other at the lingerie store. This also preempts the viewers of the upcoming death of the IT man shortly after he hands over the tape to Robert, and also resolves the foot chase scene with that character dying in a collision with a truck, as he no longer holds any significance to the main narrative of the film. It also, more importantly, puts Robert in the main spotlight and focus to the federal agents and also to the viewers, since he is now in possession of the tape, unknowingly.

Like most mainstream Hollywood action movies, the editor, Chris Lebenzon, for the movie, employs the continuity editing technique to deliver narrative information in a smooth and clear sequence of shots. It gives a moment-by-moment flow of that reveals more and more information to the viewers to unveil the story. It also keeps the viewers engaged and wanting to find out more to see what happens at the end. Will Robert get his life back to how it was? Will Thomas Brian Reynolds (Jon Voight) get away with the murder? All these questions and more, would have been raised while in the midst of watching the film as an audience member.

We also see the use of the 180 degree system throughout the film. The 180 degree system is where the filmmaker creates a space around an “axis of action”. The axis is an imaginary line that connects between 2 subjects. Almost throughout the duration of the movie, when there is a conversation between 2 or more characters, we observe the 180 degree system. It is to prevent the audience from being confused on the position and arrangement of the characters and mise-en-scene. Personally, as technical as it sounds, I thought this system was the logical and self-explanatory. It is to give the viewers a sense of actually being present in the room or venue and watching the subjects engage in a conversation. If a camera were to cross the axis, it would seem as though the we, the viewers, would have suddenly jumped or teleported to the other side of the room and suddenly both our characters have swapped positions. Like with most post-production tools, we want to have it 

Narrative Structure Exercise – Week #6

In this week’s workshop, we were given a list of questions that we should be asking ourselves before we actually head out to shoot our interview projects for Project Brief 3, which happens to be the heat of the subject for most of us Media 1 students for the most of this week and the upcoming one too. As the saying goes, “If you fail to plan, you plan to fail.”. Can’t say I fully agree with that, but it definitely holds some strong values.

Here I go…

  1. What is the ‘controlling idea’ (Robert McKee) of your portrait?
    Ans: I was thinking of a working title for my Project Brief 3, and so far I’m going for “A Tongue to Speak”, and it is about this unofficial language that we use back home in Singapore, and everyone is so accustom to talking like that till it almost becomes like a dialect or an accent.
  2. How is your portrait film structured?
    Ans: I haven’t really thought of a formal structure for it yet, but for now it starts off as Q&A with onscreen texts for the question and I have my subject replying to them. Therefore it does not require the presence of an interviewer, although during the shoot, I took the role of the interviewer, but I found it complicated to have several shots of the interviewer and interviewee, cutting it, and with the constraints of having just 1 camera, it would have taken up a lot of time shooting and less time to edit.
  3. What do you want your audience to make of your interviewee?
    Ans: To convey some information and culture to my audience on the tongue that we speak back home, “Singlish”, and how it came about, how do we use it, and even from a cultural context on how it has evolved and came a long way to where it is today.
  4. How is your portrait being narrated?
    Ans: I don’t think there’ll be any narration for my portrait, I’ll just let my interviewee do most of the speaking with some visual aid through texts for certain questions that I might have prompted during the interview session with my subject. I opt not having any narration as I thought it would have seemed a little too documentary-like and it would also require having to record voice overs of myself which I am not too comfortable about, hence end up doing many takes which would be too time consuming.
  5. What role will the ‘found footage’ play in your portrait?
    Ans: I plan to use the element of music as a found footage,  just to create the mood and uplift the entire short film. Music definitely aids in creating a scene for the audience even before they are exposed to the visual aspect of the film. I once heard of this saying, “A picture paints a thousand words, but a song paints a thousand pictures”.
  6. Does your portrait have a dramatic turning point?
    Ans: Unfortunately, no, given the topic that I am conveying to my audience, I don’t see the need for a dramatic turning point. Probably the most dramatic moment of the film would be my subject moving away from home, but that’s as dramatic as it gets.
  7. When does this turning point in your portrait and why?
    Ans: It occurs midway through or maybe towards at the end where my subject reveals her identity and what she’s doing here in Melbourne.
  8. How does your portrait gather and maintain momentum?
    Ans: It starts off with a simple Q&A and then we digress into speaking more about specific topics relating to Singapore food culture and the unofficial language we speak back home, “Singlish”.
  9. Where will your portrait’s dramatic tension come from?
    Ans: Just the tension of speaking a little more refined and articulate a little better when my subject is speaking with the locals here as compared to being back home where we can open the flood gates for “Singlish”.
  10. Does the portrait have a climax and/or resolution?
    Ans: Yes, I strongly believe there is a resolution, and that comes when my subject reveals more about herself instead of talking about the Singapore culture in general.

MC50 Interview Exercise – #Week 5

So here it is, the final cut of A Survival Guide to Survive The First 6 Weeks of Uni.

Initially I had no clue how am I going to edit this to make it seem like it was an interview, as due to our negligence we overlooked the part where there need to be one of us asking the question and 2 others answering it. However, I there was a clip of one of my group mates, Reza, repeating the question to himself, and I thought that would make a very good shot of somebody asking the question. And hence, I decided on that to be the opening shot for the viewers to understand what’s this video is all about and would not need to repeat the question along the way as all of us are talking about the same thing, therefore this helps to shorten the duration of the video instead of having the question being asked over and over again to different individuals.

I decided to add in some humour as well, by having some shots that were of Reza trying to gather himself before answering the question. As usual, some people might need to take some time to adjust themselves to feel comfortable and confident in front of the camera. I, myself, had problems speaking directly to the camera, and decided to make it seem like I was speaking to someone else behind the camera in stead of speaking to the camera to overcome that sense of nervousness.

After getting started on editing, I realised the shots I wanted, and slowly got a sense of direction of where I want to go with this short video. Despite it being a “serious” topic of how to survive in uni, I thought the element of humour in between shots would help lighten the mood as well as to give the viewer some good laughs. As a group that went out to shoot the raw footages, I thought we had fun too, and would like to convey that as well through the video on top of having such a serious topic.

Overall, I thought it was a good exercise for us to experiment on the Sony MC50 as well as how to use a tripod before we head out to start on our own recording for Project Brief 3. As mentioned in my previous post, there were some challenges we had to face with the technical side of things, but we managed to work our way around it and was soon enlightened on the problems we had when we head back into class. Look forward to working more as a group for future exercises and assignments as well as getting to know the camera more.

A Survival Guide to First 6 Weeks of Uni – Week #5

During this week’s workshop we were given this exercise and were taught how to use the Sony MC50 as well as how to use a tripod. Yes, it may seem quite fundamental, but it is just going through the formality of explaining how everything works so that everyone’s got a good understanding and that we’re all  on the same page. Besides, it serves as a good refresher for those who might already have worked on a Sony MC5, or something similar, as well as using a tripod. The exercise requires us to head out to record 2 interviewees and an interviewer, and some wide shots and cutaways. We had a little directional microphone attached to the top of the camera to pick up the audio from whatever the camera is pointing to.

20160406_110145

From the picture above as you can see that little red knob is slanted and the 3 of us who were grouped randomly by our tutor had a hard time scratching our heads on how to adjust that red knob to be flat. Despite getting the bubble dead center, the visuals wouldn’t be straight on the screen, or in technical terms, it would have appeared canted. However, despite having that problem, we decided to work our way around that and just adjusted the camera till we got a relatively level image on the screen and didn’t touch the settings on the tripod, except for folding the legs in while we were moving from location to location. Overall we managed to shoot what was required in the exercise brief and most importantly had fun taking up the different roles of being the interviewer, interviewee and the guy who stands behind the camera to press the little red button and gesture to the subject that we’re recording…

Other little minor hiccups we encountered were trying to find the right location around RMIT’s building 80. Since it was raining outside and we didn’t have that much time to run out to other venues, we decided to just find little pockets of the building where it was quiet and were not crowded. Obviously, some were taken up by other Media 1 groups doing the same exercise, but it was all good, there was enough space to go round.

After gathering all our raw footages around building 80, we transferred the files into our computers where we could edit and create a sequence from there. I’ve done a rough cut, but might want to fine tune it a little more before rendering and exporting it out into a final cut.

In a nutshell, I think it was a good exercise for us to get our hands on the little Sony MC50 which served as a good prequel to what’s to come in future assignments and exercises when working in the different studios. Oh and we did raise the issue we had over the tripod to our tutor, and she managed to find the nut that was locked and prevented the red knob from moving, so in future, when it comes to using the tripod, I think I would be more versed in doing so.

 

The Right Questions – Week #5

I am actually quite excited in getting my hands dirty for Project Brief 3. At this very moment, I have not really started on anything solid, but I have a very good idea on what I’ll be doing for the 1-2 minutes long video. Don’t want to spoil anything for anyone, but I am really looking forward to getting down to the actual production and recording process of my subject and the topics that we are going to cover.

In this week’s workshop, we were taught how to ask questions. And not just any ol’questions, questions that actually grab your audience attention and keep them wanting to know more. I try to keep myself in the audience’s shoes while I was brainstorming for questions that I intend to ask my subject. And I realised this phrase kept popping up in my mind, “And then? And then? And then? And then?”. It is just the fear of not asking enough to sieve out the answers and information I need to keep my audience attention in check. In newscasting there is the “grab” where it catches the attention of the viewer, and usually the “grab” only lasts 3 seconds before you loses the viewer’s attention. Therefore, in order to keep my audience’s attention, I would have to come up with good questions and not just a generic yes or no question for my subject. (Am still brainstorming questions).

As mention above, I’m still very much in the pre-production stage where I’m mainly planning and brainstorming ideas for the entire project. And location has been one of the main things to cover. Since it’s an interview, it should take place in somewhere quiet, where I can record the audio on a separate track and mix it into the sequence if I want to. If I were to do the interview in a crowded area or a place out in the open, whatever audible sound that is not my subject’s voice might bleed into the microphone, and I might have a hard time mixing or getting rid of that in post. Would want to have a big reminder on that, because it’s so easy to overlook that when I have my main focus on the visuals.

Speaking of visuals, there is a torrent of possibilities to carry out an interview, there is the person to person interview, the voice over (where you don’t see the interviewee, just a voice over some visuals), or just the interviewee speaking, and more. One tip that I got from this week’s lectorial was to get the subject to repeat the question in their answer. So if I asked what did you have for breakfast. Instead of my subject saying, “I had bacon and eggs…”, I should get them to say, “What I had for breakfast was bacon and eggs.”. And that would help so much in editing the film later. I would then have the option of including me, the interviewer, in the sequence, or just have my interviewee speaking on the topic. I have not really decided whether I should stick to one or have a mix of both, so I’ll need to consider that before I go into post production.

Another thing I was considering was the song choice or whether to even have a backing music throughout the sequence. But I realised, I would discover that along the way during post production, since I don’t have a hard and solid sequence yet. It would be good to have music to lift things and set the mood, but it might be a distraction for the audience. As mentioned during one of the workshops, while doing an interview or documentary, it is always good to have an instrumental track playing in the background while the interviewee is speaking so as to avoid any clashing with the vocals of a song that might have lyrics in it, so I’ll look out for that.

In a nutshell, I think I’m good to go, and now only thing’s stopping me is arranging a suitable time for my subject to be available for a shoot, but that’s being sorted out as I write this post. So I’m having my fingers crossed…

Older posts Newer posts
Skip to toolbar