ECU

Earlier last week Ella posted a video ‘Sounds of Aronofsky’. It’s really cool. Personally I’m a huge fan of the old ECU as you can probably tell by looking at my Korsakow films. I think this is kind of what the Integrated constraints have been trying to get us to do. We are only allowed to show parts of things, and this clip certainly does. I love that idea. Just showing parts of things. I love how it takes a few seconds to get your head around what you’re seeing. It’s almost slightly abstract. It’s really beautiful and intimate, even if it’s something not so pretty; like the goo between the fingers, the drugs, strange body parts.

 

Jawwdan Belfowwwt

So I watched the Wolf of Wall Street. I also read the Wolf of Wall Street. Then I stalked the whole cast, the crew, the real life people the movie was based on, what they did back then and what they do now.

Some would say I’m a little obsessed. This is how I get after seeing a movie I loved. It happened with Titanic, Back to the Future, Avatar and so on.

 

Anyway, Jordan Belfort in real life is a pretty amazing guy. Sure he is an asshole. But he is a very clever asshole, and watching his seminar clips on youtube, in fact watching him speak in general is so entertaining and so inspiring.

 

Just watch this clip and tell me you don’t want to write down some grand vision you have for the future and start acting on it.

 

 

What can Korsakow do?

 

What can Korsakow do? That is how Adrian wants us to think. What can we use it for? He says we are thinking about it wrong and that we shouldn’t think of it as how do we tell this story with this program. He used a hammer and nail metaphor.

The difference between Korsakow films and normal films is that the Korsakow films are not linear. They can still tell a story/narrative, however they tell them in different parts, different time lines and so on. This really inspired me.

It reminded me of 500 Days of Summer, a film that plays with time and we see different parts of a relationship in a non-chronological order. Something similar to that would make an excellent Korsakow film.

Something as simple as a character study would make a good Korsakow film, you can show different parts of their life, but it won’t necessarily tell the audience what to think. The audience can make their own assumptions based on which clips they see in the film. They can decide when they have seen enough clips, and choose to come back to the film and re-watch it depending on their engagement with the film.

Closure is not invested in the media object in a Korsakow film, it’s invested in the audience. They stop watching when they’ve had enough.

 

Overall,this lecture has been my favourite so far as I feel pretty inspired and motivated to create a cool interactive story through Korsakow. I love scriptwriting and the sentence that gripped me the most in the lecture was when Adrian said it’s not about having a kick ass story idea, it’s how you tell the story that matters. All the other lecturers nodded in unison.

 

 

Why do we shoot to edit?

Shooting to edit is easier and quicker all round in a production. Keeping the edit in mind whilst filming makes the job easier for any editor.

Efficiency:

Simply we shoot to edit because it’s efficient. If your film has two locations; Dandenong and Brunswick, and the film goes back and forth between these two locations, it would be very difficult to shoot otherwise. You would have to set up the shot in Dandenong, shoot it, pack up, back to Brunswick, set up, shoot it, pack up, back to Dandenong etc… Not only would you waste a lot of time packing and setting up again, you would waste a lot of time travelling between the two. It only makes sense to shoot all the Brunswick shots in one slot and Dandenong in the other.

 

Continuity:

I have been continuity supervisor for a TV show before and shooting to edit is simply the most efficient way of achieving continuity through out film. For example we had two scenes that were to be shot in the same loungroom that were different times of the day in the script. Instead of shooting in chronological order we shot the two scenes together so the whole shot did not have to be set up twice; we set up tea towels, food, cushions, moved furniture etc… It would have taken a long time to set it all up again if we shot it separately and we wouldn’t have achieved a decent continuity either.

 

 

P.S That photo is a site in Brunswick near where I grew up and it was used for the Australian Comedy ‘The Castle’.

Korsakow

It confuses me.

I understand that we should be open to new programs and should try our hardest to learn how to use it because adapting is the way of the future blah blah blah…

BUT I have no idea how to use this. I’ve spent time playing around on it. I just can’t do it. I am usually good with these sorts of programs. I taught myself how to use photoshop, final cut, motion and other stuff but I can not for the life of me understand this program.

To me it seems most of this program is unnecessary and goes about doing simple things in a very hard way. Why can’t I just drag and drop videos where I want them to be?

I would love to know why this program out of all the hundreds of thousands of available programs in the world was chosen for our course.

 

 

What worries me the most is that apparently it would be unusual for us not to have to start again because the program shuts down and deletes everything.

 

images

Korsakow Essay

 

 

 

‘Lucid dreaming’ is when one is aware they are dreaming, it is also the title of the Korsakow film from 2011 I studied. In lucid dreaming, the dreamer has a greater sense of participation and may be able to somewhat control their experiences within the dream. They are described as ‘vivid and realistic’. In this Korsakow film, dreams and nightmares were explored in a simple interface lay out.

 

The simplicity of the interface is what drew me in with this Korsakow film. There are only two options to click; dark or light. They are two polar opposites and the videos that follow resonate with this. Click the black background image and you are taken to a short clip resembling a nightmare, click the white background image and you are taken to a short clip resembling a warm, comforting dream. Using this interface is like travelling through a series of lucid dreams; you don’t know what you’re going to get, or what it will be about however you participate by choosing light or dark, relaxing or chaotic. The two buttons are in the lower two corners, opposite ends of the clip that currently plays. They swap sides with every click, so the light dreams are on the bottom right and the next clip they are the bottom left. This highlights the erratic nature of lucid dreams.

 

After clicking the light square, a short clip will be played with content that is warm and calming. There are clips of a family on the beach, a grassy meadow, a child running through a forrest and so on. For me, many of them triggered memories as they were general enough to relate to a wide range of people. And for me, not just any memories, but childhood memories that seem almost if they were a dream now. The pier reminded me of fishing with my uncle on the Mornington Peninsula. The child running through the forest reminded me of a time I slept over at an old friend’s house on the top of Mount Macedon and we carved our names into trees in the forest there.  All these clips use minimal camera movement, or slow movements to enhance the calming atmosphere. Soft and dainty music can be heard over selected clips, the tune different every time, whilst other clips only use diegetic sound such as waves crashing on the shore. It is reminiscent of sounds you hear during a yoga class or at a spa/salon. The colours used in the clips are pastel and warm colours, again fitting in with the theme. All of the light button clips convey a sense of warmth and comfort and are easy to watch on repeat.

 

As a complete opposite, the black button clips are unsettling to watch. They resemble the nightmares within dreams and live up to the name. There are clips of lonely warehouses, cob webs, figures in the dark and hands bashing on doors. Some of these also triggered memories for me. The figure wrapped in a sheet creeping up on the camera in the dark reminded me of how I was afraid to open my eyes at night in a certain period in my childhood because I was afraid someone would be standing next to my bed. Some of these clips were edited in a fast paced way to create a sense of chaos within the ‘dream’. To enhance that, the camera movements were also fast and shaky. There were sounds of banging whilst grieving was hear off camera somewhere and complete silence as figures creeped around. The colours used were dark and grey. Altogether the clips were not comfortable to watch and you would rather stop them half way and click the light button.

 

A pattern through out the clips was focus. Shots were constantly pulled in and out of focus, either creating a sense of disorientation or a soft fuzzy warmth, depending on how it was used. This out of focus also made the clips seem like a forgotten memory and very dreamlike. All the clips seemed to be as if I was looking through someone else’s eyes. The focus and the point of view style shots combined to create the feeling of being in a dream, and this was the pattern through out all the clips.  This pattern of being in a dream and the interface, joins to create a travel through lucid dreams in the form of a Korsakow film.

 

The film is experimental. It tells no narrative nor does it have any story. It is merely poetic, with a bunch of clips that are tied together by their pattern. The bunch of clips challenges the viewer, triggering memories, both good and bad. It creates a need for order, How do all the clips tie in? Do they? I think by watching these clips in random orders a story could be built upon the random order. Piece by piece, these clips could structure a character having the dreams, their darkest fears, their happiest moments. Although there is no true narrative or story in the Korsakow film, one could be built with the audience’s participation.

 

READINGS AND LECTURES

What is reality TV? Adrian stated in this lecture that these days popular reality TV isn’t actually reality. Unlike Cops and RBT that acts as a fly on the wall style of reality, the most popular reality these shows are programs like Masterchef and The Block and My Kitchen Rules. They are truly reality because at which point in time would you be asked to cook something including egg and pineapple under 30 mins? Probably never.

Adrian said these shows are more like a hybrid media project that include platforms such as twitter and phone lines for voting and public discussion.

The biggest media platform on the planet  is video games. So an element of this has been used in reality TV shows to generate users and create a game within the show. Players or contestants have challenges they have to meet, goals to conquer, and this is what is exciting.

I found that very interesting since recently I have delved into the world of marketing through job opportunities. People like to see others challenged.