Frank Ocean in 2017

2017 is the year of Frank Ocean.

Ok, to be fair, Frank Ocean is my favourite artist (of all time!) and this proposal may be laced with hyperbole considering April isn’t even over, but the man has had an incredible output in 2017 so far. Frank fans went from famished to obese in the space of nine months. Following his debut record channel ORANGE in 2012, Frank hit the switch on hibernation mode. Between 2012 and 2016 he limited his appearances to rare sightings and guest verses on tracks like Beyoncé’s Superpower and John Mayer’s Wildfire among other big names, as the world presumed he was hard at work on that highly anticipated sophomore record.

Everything changed when the calendar rolled over to August 2016, and on the first day of the month a livestream was launched on his website. This effectively marked the beginning of a new Frank Ocean (and a new me: I spent every night from the 1st to the 20th with a headache, lying in a half-awake state, dreaming twisted dreams about release dates and the possibilities of new stuff), a man who made his own rules. Spoilers: the livestream culminated in a visual album, Endless, released on the 19th, which fulfilled (and freed) him from his contract with Def Jam, a signal of his new creative independence. A day later Frank followed this with (what could be the greatest album of all time) Blonde, the ‘real’ album, a departure from channel ORANGE‘s RNB-inspired ballads, an avant-garde mix of soul and pop exploding into the musical stratosphere. Frank was officially back. I slept like a baby that night.

Of course the independent release and giant ‘middle finger to the man’ of Blonde stirred some noise at Universal as Frank took to Apple Music as his platform of choice, their model appearing a beacon of hope in the world of ‘independent’ artistry. Blonde received 20 days exclusivity on iTunes and Apple Music before being deployed to all the regular streaming services, following in the footsteps of proud independent artist Chance the Rapper, who himself released his latest mixtape Coloring Book (discarding the word ‘album’ as a gesture to the independence and ‘freeness’ of his music) with two weeks Apple Music exclusivity. These deals generated conversation about ‘true’ independence in the music industry, new canals for music releases and in many ways foreshadowed the launch of Frank’s new endeavours. In light of their (semi?-)post-industrial approach, both artists have earned comparisons to Prince (imo Frank’s comparison more apt in its ideas of breaking down walls of sexuality and identity of black artists) in their rejection of the traditional hierarchy, their “finding a way to use the system to serve their music, rather than becoming servants of the industry“.

After four years of waiting and being fed two full length releases in such a small period of time, no one expected to be eating again so soon; the dust had hardly settled on Blonde and everyone was strapped in for another elongated interval of radio silence. No one expected a plate of scraps, let alone the buffet that followed. Fast forward to the end of February this year and badabing badaboom! banzanga!, here’s your first episode of Frank’s new blonded RADIO, a radio station on Apple’s free-to-air Beats 1 radio, accompanying the release of Slide by Calvin Harris (feat. Frank Ocean). The man was back in the driver’s seat. It was smooth sailing from here on out; “oh, you’re happy about that release? Here’s the next episode of blonded RADIO with a new song, and another episode with a new song, and just if you’re feeling lucky, have this: another episode with a new song” (real quote). The famine was over. New Frank was pouring out of every crack in the sky straight into the mouths of every starved stan.

Frank going independent following Endless was a blessing; his output in the time succeeding is representative of the post-industrial media era that is increasingly becoming the norm. No more big labels. No more quotas to fill. Using the framework of industrial media to launch his career, Frank developed a fanbase that was loyal to him as an artist, not just as a brand (influenced by his reclusive persona); he absorbed the way things were now done and then cut the cord. Within two months he has released 4 songs (three to his name, one feature) with little-to-no release dates, a simple tweet by Beats 1 or a post on his personal tumblr a mere few hours (or minutes) before the episode airs to generate a stir (followed by a press release no doubt) and act as a signal for new music.

As we know, streaming services have already changed the game up drastically and Apple Music Radio’s new relationship with artists, foregrounding their creativity is telling in terms of the messy shift from an industrial to post-industrial era. blonded RADIO can be streamed without an Apple Music subscription on Beats 1 radio (opening the service up to the ~700 million iPhone users that have the Music app integrated into their phones), and Frank’s releases eventually roll out worldwide on streaming services to all. As the endgame for this new radio project remains ambiguous one finds solace in this remark from his first interview post-Blonde:

“Because I’m not in a record deal, I don’t have to operate in an album format. I can operate in half-a-song format.”

Of course, I don’t have the answers to any of this. What’s going on under the hood is undoubtedly a complex process and this simplification of these underlying structures is bold but I’ll take any chance to lament on the secrets of my favourite musician (and this isn’t even touching on the alternative versions of his new songs, their features and some stuff on the low-fi/high-fi dynamic). His seemingly autonomous approach to releasing music post-Endless (ties to Apple Music leave some things unknown) could lead the way in revolutionising the way music releases currently roll out. But let’s not get ahead of ourselves; for now, let’s wait and see. This ‘half-a-song format’ may just become the norm.

Thursday

An interesting class. Breaking us out of our groups into others for at least a small part of the studio was a nice refresher and talking to new faces is always a plus (participation +10 points). Adrian’s rants/spiels/musings on the future of our practice are always of great interest, his confidence in presentation an enrapturing listen. Points about broadcast TV, monument/industrial vs post-industrial/post-monument eras, old models vs new models are, as Adrian agrees, exciting, and being on the brink of this new wave is certainly a cool experience, and considering I never really wanted to come out of this course operating a camera in a studio it’s kind of a relief.

Presentation of work has always been a nerve-wracking activity for me but the feedback was favourable and definitely of help to unraveling the ideas of the next essay. Seeing everyone else’s work up on the screen was comforting and it’s evident from this work that we have all learned from our previous work. What’s next is to go even further than this, as Adrian noted; more specific, finer tuned, greater attention. Learn to paint, not just to compose.

The German work is again wonderful and inspires me to replicate their technical genius.


PS: Lana Del Rey and The Weeknd have a new song.

Thursdy

This is what our media practice is: we assemble lots and lots of small bits and we compile or find patterns within them.

Murmuration – like jazz. One neuron doesn’t know what all the other neurons in your brain are doing, but it still works.

Extract one part of your given soundscape and think of it as a thing in itself, remove it from its context. Treat it as an object. Play with the sound – stretch, loop, re-create. Use same procedural, rule-given thing for each part. Making machines: machines have inputs an outputs and they do stuff in between.

Create a rule and stick to it. Trust the process. Realise this is a very effective and efficient way to produce work.

Removed the necessity of composing a complete work.

Fractal.

Possible avenues:

  • vibration
  • “revolution”
  • “touch”

Abstraction.

A word only means something literally by virtue of what it is not. There is no intrinsic connection between the word and the thing.

 

Participation

This is not gonna be good.

The past week I’ve been swamped (emphasis on the swamped) with assignments that I’d not given myself due time to complete, thereby surrendering my right to complain about them. I got the work done, I felt ok about it, but after every assignment comes the “I swear on my life I’ll start it earlier next time!” cry for help which every time remains unanswered.

Participation for this studio was minimal at best, I forgot that juggling a week of assignments from other classes tends to eat up your designated free time to blog about noticings. Most of my participation for this class mostly revolved around thinking about this class, without necessarily any action being done. To be fair, I didn’t feel like there was anything I was behind on, or needed to catch up on, or have done, so I’m not feeling particularly guilty. This is the limbo that exists after assessment submission, time given to regroup your thoughts and do better (participation wise, too) next assessment. I have been noticing new patterns of thought that have come out of this studio, a lot of ye old ‘philosophical pondering’ if we’re being cliched, but I do believe this studio has changed my outlook on a lot of things. Putting that thinking to action is the next step.

This time I’ll do better, I swear on my life.


Sidenote: Trainspotting is overrated.

Thursday scribblings

Alien phenomenology – everything is alien to everything else.

Stop viewing things as ‘snapshots’.

Expansion of relations.

The artefact beholds the maker – not a photographer without a photograph with your name on it.

What’s the difference between ontography and typology? Ontography rejects that things belong in one place (like library classification.)

It is impossible to identify all relations things have to one another, that’s why they’re all alien to each other.

Instead of thinking of things as a fixed entity, think about where they will be in 10–100 years.

We are just containers for our DNA and once you pass reproductive age your body starts to break down because you’re no longer needed.

Make lists that arrive from specific constraints.

Oulipo.

Find a constraint upfront and follow it.

Better work after surrendering some of your agency to your technology.

Ecology

Our agency is a participant in an ecology.

Documentary as a way of trying to listen to something instead of imposing ourselves on it.

Sound file to image, image file to sound.

Technical media can record accidents whereas writing can not.

What can the image track become for the sound track rather than just service it?

Exploded view diagram in sound of something** – think like a different species.

Ontography – Bogost (#1)

Bogost returns with what is his Batman Returns, his Toy Story 2, his Empire Strikes Back. This chapter comes with a more comprehensible dialect than its predecessor and in turn becomes a better read.

Major points:

Bogost adopts ontography as ‘a name for a general inscriptive strategy, one that uncovers the repleteness of units and their interobjectivity.’ He states that his adoption of the word differs in meaning than that of Harman’s (still unsure on specifics of Harman’s definition). To-do: file this definition.

Ontography’s comparison to a ‘medieval bestiary’ is perhaps its most revealing in understanding in simple terms how it may work.

Furthermore, it is ‘a record of things juxtaposed to demonstrate their overlap and imply interaction through collocation’, collocation being a linguistics term for a word or phrase that is often used with another word or phrase, in a way that sounds correct to people who have spoken the language all their lives, but might not be expected from the meaning. Cool.

Later, Bogost goes on to say that ontological cataloging’s strengths lie in its abandonment of ‘anthropocentric narrative coherence in favour of worldly detail’. True as this may be, again considering the thoughts in my previous post , how does one list things without splurging their human viewpoint all other the order or content of the list. I realise Bogost’s ideas may not be as radical as a complete eradication of an anthropocentric perspective, so where do his boundaries lie? As interesting as his writing may be (very!), what does he hope to achieve with his writing? (obviously time to re-read).