Media Misrepresentation and Manipulation

Almost two weeks ago, I got a message from my girlfriend with a link to a Facebook post by one of her former (and much loved and respected) school captains detailing the night he was kicked out of her school’s annual Foundation Day event, held at Bendigo’s (my hometown) cathedral for attending in inappropriate attire. At the time, I thought it was just another post that would sift through the thousands upon thousands of other posts that live on the site.

uh oh spaghetti

But this one stuck. And hard. In under 5 hours, the post had garnered over 800 shares and was well into the thousands of likes and comments, all praising Angus’ bravery and shunning the school’s conservatism (personally, I stand by Angus’ decision to wear the clothes–fairly tame in my opinion). Although I don’t doubt that Angus was well aware the school is extremely traditionalist (anyone who lives in my town has a certain perception of the school and knows their policies), his decision to push their limits was risky, and for that I commend him, but some part of me feels like he was just trying to stir something; I don’t doubt that in one way or another he knowingly violated the dress code (for better or worse; changes to the school’s, and by extension the broader social stigma, or just a hit back at a bump in the road from the past?). But that’s not entirely the point.

At 7:40 the post hit local newspaper Bendigo Advertiser’s website, which makes no explicit reference to the incident being about Angus’ sexuality, with comments from the headmaster (which they took the time out of their day to actually do some hard earned actual journalism) clearly asserting that the occurrence was “an issue of dress code for occasion and institution, not one of sexual discrimination“. Flash forward 24 hours and the post shows up on Cosmopolitan and Buzzfeed, among various other clickbait-y scum sites, with titles posted up on their sites like “You’ll Never Believe the Messed-Up Reason This Gay Man Was Kicked Out of His School Event“, “This Gay Man Was Kicked Out Of An Event For “Dressing Inappropriately”” and my personal favourite “GAY STUDENT EXPELLED: DRESS SENSE ‘DIDN’T SUIT’“, where the title is clearly vague enough to suggest a completely different  story, which flip the whole situation on its dang head. Skewed to the point of no return.

What happened in those 24 hours is the careless media machine at work, churning (and clearly skimming) through the stacks of stories and pulling one out to turn it into the sensationalist piece of web trash where social media users (skimmers) can stop for two seconds, read the misleading headline, like the post, and move on, preaching to their friends and followers about how they ‘read’ an article on something or other when they clearly just had a quick peek at the title. It’s unforgiving and it’s unfortunate, and it pains me to the point of extreme frustration.

How to Make a Good Article, by No-Name Author Who Writes Like a 12 Year Old Who’s Just Discovered Emojis: Step 1: Clickbait headline; Step 2: copy and paste other trustworthy news sites articles and offer no mention or explanation of said clickbait title; Step 3: get paid for being the ignorant, cheap ‘journalist’ that you are.

One of my girlfriend’s teachers happened to be the teacher who allegedly told Angus to leave and has since announced that they didn’t actually ask him to leave but rather disallowed him from sitting in a certain 2-row section at the front of the cathedral, after which Angus supposedly made his exit. Additionally, the night of the Facebook post the teacher’s front yard was vandalised. Mob mentality truly is frightening.

I’m also lowkey furious at the scourge of the earth that is Cosmopolitan for the opening line “Angus McCormick was visiting his hometown of Victoria, Australia…”, like dudes, come on, do some dang research, plus this: “Since the incident, he has not been contacted by the school“, when there is clear-cut evidence to show that he has. Moral of the story: clickbait websites are the scum of the earth, and double check your sources before you fully commit to a story, whether you’re the writer or the reader.

Technological determinism, digital amnesia and the failing hard drive in our heads

While searching for any excuse to not be blogging (and delaying any lectorial posts) I skimmed through my Following list and saw Ryan’s post about technological determinism posted on his much acclaimed Knock Knock Appreciation Blog and thought it was time to give in. Short and sweet (the opposite to my posts), he touches on Nicolas Carr’s 2008 essay ‘Is Google Making Us Stupid?‘, something I took the liberty of reading (at least 80% of). Today, writings on social media’s influence on our brains has been done almost to death, but flashing back to 2008 Carr’s writings seem all the more stimulating. 2008 was hardly long ago yet I can recall next to nothing from the year (I was eleven, grade 5: I think I was excelling at at maths? Still blind and glasses-less, struggling my way through life), and the notion of social media and the internet seems so recent that 2008 somehow feels like decades in the past, and Carr something of a prophet (hyperbole), even though Facebook had been around for almost half a decade the internet itself almost two. This mindset just comes from being born in the 90s, I guess.

2001-A-Space-Odyssey-2

Even trying to write this, I became distracted an uncountable amount of times, engrossed in my phone or struggling to stand by the deal I made (and often make) with myself where I reward my unwavering attention to a task with a YouTube video or something of the like (the video usually comes first, and most of the time stimulates positive work). Even just reading this, I had the tendency to skim sections relating to the history of the theory and take a liking to cute little metaphors that basically summed up arguments like “Once I was a scuba diver in the sea of words. Now I zip along the surface like a guy on a Jet Ski“, and “The process of adapting to new intellectual technologies is reflected in the changing metaphors we use to explain ourselves to ourselves. When the mechanical clock arrived, people began thinking of their brains as operating “like clockwork.” Today, in the age of software, we have come to think of them as operating “like computers.”” You win this time, Carr.

Regardless, Carr’s writings ring as true now as they did then. But since, the phenomenon The Google Effect has been named, and the answer to Carr’s question answered: yeah righto, maybe a little bit, in one way or another. The effect, also known as digital amnesia is defined as the “tendency to forget information that can be found readily online by using Internet search engines” and is definitely something I have fallen victim to (not that it doesn’t have its benefits; thanks, amalgamation of information readily available at our fingertips).

Even in Popular Culture in Everyday Life, one of my chosen electives for first semester, we were taught how to properly skim pieces of writing. There’s no doubt it’s an efficient tool when left in the right hands. But there’s also no doubt that some aspects of the ever-engrossing truthfulness of technological determinism are problematic. I read less books than I used to (something I’ve been trying to change as of late; even though I never really read that many books) and although the enjoyment I draw from skimming articles online is a far cry from that of traditional (often physical; maybe an influence?) books, I do get fidgety and think to reach for my phone. It’s not the healthiest thing, and when I am putting myself in a position where I want or need to read for an extended period, I put my phone at least out of arm’s reach. Moreover, the AMC ‘phones in the cinema’ debacle in April, with CEO’s possibility of a ‘texting section’ or ‘specific auditorium and make them more texting friendly’ (many explicitly explicitly asked that these be clearly labelled so they know which ones to stay as far as possible away from) stemming from a similar strand of thinking.

In the increasingly digitised world of 2016, Carr’s claim that “In Google’s world … The human brain is just an outdated computer that needs a faster processor and a bigger hard drive” is at least a little prophetic. The problem now is that the hard drive is failing, and at a more rapid rate than expected.

On Radiohead

♪ music for your reading pleasure ♪

Here I am, sitting at my desk with coffee in hand, body teeming with that surge of irritability that a lack of sleep pushes out, headphones in, Apple Music on and delivering to me what I’ve been waiting for so eagerly for the past few days; A Moon Shaped Pool. Radiohead’s ninth record.

It’s an odd predicament because I would hardly even call myself a die hard fan, yet last night I attempted to sleep from 9:30pm until the album’s release at 4:00am. It just felt right (at the time at least). There are large portions of their discography that I haven’t even come close to listening to (I downloaded their last 3 LPs only this week) but something about the very prospect of a new Radiohead album at this point in time just drew me in. It’s possible that it came right at a time when I was at the peak of my music-listening period (James Blake, Skepta, Car Seat Headrest and Death Grips all released albums (/had albums leak) this week) and I’ve dedicated a lot more time than usual to tuning into these entries.

And of course, part of this plenitude of excitement is due to their release methods; hiatus following their last album tour until a little something something I like to call their greatest contribution to cinema that never existed, their rejected Spectre theme song. The radioplay this got (among my repetition of the song that came every time I opened iTunes) could definitely be attributed to creating this deep-seeded enthusiasm towards the band. Following that, another period of silence until May 1st, where complete social media extermination from the band gave a few hints towards something new, and BANG BANG: May 3rd we got Burn the Witch and May 6th we got Daydreaming and an album release date. And here we are now, May 9th with the entirety of A Moon Shaped Pool in our unworthy ears. First new Radiohead LP in 5 years and it’s over like that.

My 4am alarm-setting venture didn’t work out in the end–I slept briskly from 9:30 to ~10:40, pissed around on my laptop from then until 1:30 with the idea of a 4am start still swirling through my mind. When it came down to business, I unconsciously hit snooze on my alarm, woke up at 4:10, checked their Facebook page and saw that it was out, checked Apple Music and saw that it wasn’t, and dozed back off. Mission partly accomplished. Big ups to the boys at Radiohead HQ for somehow convincing me through their musical endeavours and marketing genius that it was a good idea in the first place.

Serendipity: I’ll allow it

Well, well, well: never thought I’d find myself here.

Today I had planned to grind through some serious research, note-taking and other general uni related study in order to leave time tomorrow for a shoot my friend had asked me to help out on for his short film (Film & TV course at Swinburne) when BANG BANG he hits me up at 11:39am with a message: “MIGHT NEED YOU TO COME HELP WITH SOUND LATER TODAY IF YOU FINISH YOUR WORK SOMEONE DROPPED OUT”. And here I am now, 8:50pm, home sweet home, more fulfilled than ever (I even tried Korean food). How’s that for serendipity.

Even then, that’s not the serendipitous part I was intending to write about; this came when it started raining after we arrived on location. And BANG BANG, we found ourselves shooting downstairs, in one of Swinburne’s cute little cafes. The new location was perfect, better than it ever could have been in the gray-walled prison-esque original rooftop area of campus that the original shooting had intended to occur at. Thanks, Media One. Thanks, rain. Thanks in advance, chiropractor who will fix my back after the pain it suffered through holding up a shotgun mic for extended durations.

Fair Use

The two words (and subsequent multitude of slabs of legal terminology after) that allow the greatest YouTubers to keep on keeping on. Bless you, parody and satire regulations.

parody
ˈparədi/
noun
  1. an imitation of the style of a particular writer, artist, or genre with deliberate exaggeration for comic effect.