Landscape Suicide

Adrian brought up James Benning in class on Thursday. This switched the reminder button back on which beamed the title “LANDSCAPE SUICIDE” in big neon lights intermittently, kinda like a combination of the genesis of Dirk Diggler in Boogie Nights and the blinking ‘SILENZIO’ sign in Berberian Sound Studio, but in a less sensationalised, less wow!-producing motion. So, in reality it only popped up for a second and I had since forgotten about it.

I woke up late this morning, feeling lethargic and with a resounding sigh at having to write this essay (that my brain keeps sparking off randomly about with great thoughts that soon get forgotten — PSA: get that little notebook you were talking about in that other blog post). I felt like watching something. And then the neon lights flickered for a second and I found my answer.

Landscape Suicide, directed by James Benning in 1987. My friend had given me and another friend an .avi file a couple of years and of the group of the three of us — one welcomed it with open arms while the other’s attempts to decipher it were fruitless — I was the only one who hadn’t seen it yet. And thankfully so. I feel like right now was the perfect time for me to have watched it. The version of me before I started this studio would definitely have taken up arms with my friend who drew nothing out of the film.

Benning has been described as “a quiet, unassuming investigator of filmic ontology” (shoutout Senses of Cinema). In Landscape Suicide, his camera sits static. He lets the frame unfold by itself — watching, waiting — but interrupts the scene with blackouts, not even second long cuts to black. At first, it’s disorientating in its aggression but once you find the rhythm inherent in the cuts it makes the experience all the more engaging. A reviewer on Letterboxd links this effect to the human act of blinking, where doing so causes you to “lose an almost indivisible amount of time” — “blink and you’ll miss it”, they say. As the film unfolds as an ‘investigation’ of sorts, this effect is at its most vital during the interview scenes — reenacted with sheer brilliance by Rhonda Bell and Elion Sucher, who portray small-town high-school killer Bernadette Protti, and infamous murderer Ed Gein, respectively — where the importance of collecting and literally seeing the truth is essential.

Benning’s images bear resemblance to Bogost’s reading of Stephen Shore’s ontographical photograph. Indeed, ‘the Shore ontograph takes things already gathered and explodes them into their tiny, separate, but contiguous universes’ and through Benning’s recording of rural America, his static frame seeks to emulate this and explode the relations of Americana, to uncover the truth in the mundane. His documenting is unbiased (he gives equal time to small time high school killer as he does body snatcher Ed Geins) as he plays out both halves of the film in the most parallel of fashions. The result is truly mesmerising. It’s more dense than I can describe in a couple hundred words.

So, the answer to all this is to accidentally turn your alarm off, sleep in until 11am and hope that you wake up and remember about that movie that your friend put on your hard drive that one time, and it might help you collect your thoughts on philosophy and ultimately help you write an essay.

From now on, I’ll be sure to replace the batteries in the neon lights in my head so that these ideas don’t blow out in the future.

Movies I’ve watched this week – 27/05/16

Week #12. This is the end, finally.

Aguirre: The Wrath of God (1972) dir. Werner Herzog
25/05/16
rewatch

aguirre

Self explanatory. ★★★★½

My Best Fiend (1999) dir. Werner Herzog
25/05/16

Beginning to think I like Herzog more as a documentarian than a fiction filmmaker, though his success in documentary would be next to nothing if it wasn’t for the remainder of his oeuvre; more obviously in My Best Fiend, which explores his relationship with megalomaniac actor and friend Klaus Kinsi throughout their collaborative career, and more subtly in Grizzly Man, where the notion of man v nature which more or less plagues the majority of his works throughout the 70s-80s, is exploited in a non-fictional format with Herzog clearly holding the reins. Has a compositional knack for staging interviews (even when they, and mostly do, consist of himself retelling a story) and somehow channels a surrealist mood in such retellings. ★★★★★

Super 8 (2011) dir. J.J. Abrams
26/05/16
rewatch

Written for Letterboxd: 

Abrams wears his Spielbergian influence on his sleeve (obvious considering he produced too) and replicates much of the shell of his early works be it through the child-driven narrative or spectacularly alien finale, even down to his distinctive close-ups, but this characteristic referencing only doubles the impact of Super 8. He infuses the artificiality of it knowingly being a film (a highly self-aware one; known through lens flares and madly pivotal crane shots drawn again from his influences) into a somehow warm family drama which despite its gross explicitness towards the end (a balancing act of feel-good revelations and heavy handed symbolism) feels right. It knows Spielberg and Spielberg knows it.

It’s aware of its ethereality from the get go with the insanity of the initial train crash scene (amongst my favourite scenes probably ever) to the arrival of army forces in almost comic numbers and disposition. On a much smaller scale, Abrams demonstrates this when he has the kids go from filming a cutesy zombie home video to watching in disbelief as one of their teachers seemingly come back to life in the space of ~5 minutes (love it). It’s this symmetry of artificiality and sincerity that he channels through the body of his producer’s work, that he directs with such clarity and perspective that make it the dense masterwork that it is.

Undoubtedly a personal film for Abrams himself, I also find an odd homeliness for myself in the spectacle of the film, something warm and comforting and sweet like a reel of childhood imagery played out on the big screen. There’s something so poignant about the invincibility of youth (which never ceases to put a lump in my throat) that he portrays here, the childlike, authoritative feeling of closure and safety that rings true to me, a period in my life I’ve kinda come to miss. The first time I saw this was only around 18 months ago which doesn’t give it much of a nostalgic bearing to be tapped into on rewatch here, so I’ll attribute that to Abrams’ ability to hone in on raw Spielberg, a man whose films got their fair share of replays in my childhood.

There is truth in the moving image, whether it literally be the reels that reveal the alien’s true nature, or bigger; a compilation of the fleeting, youthful moments of innocence brought to life by Fanning and co. And that’s kinda nice. Aren’t we all a little Abrams at heart? ★★★★★

This is the end. It’s been nice knowing y’all. Now go look for someone who knows more about movies than me.

Margot Nash: A Cinematheque Retrospective

Tonight the Cinematheque hosted their weekly screening this week in the small cinema at ACMI which unfortunately was the night where their filmmaker in focus was actually at the screening. Margot Nash introduced her new film The Silences and answered the crowd’s various inquiries; an enlightening, and unconventionally New Zealand (if not partly Australian) experience. Right on.

IMG_7196

Movies I’ve watched this week – 13/05/16

Week #10. It’s been 2 weeks since I’ve been to Cinematheque and I’m having withdrawals.

 

Scooby-Doo (2002) dir. Raja Gosnell
07/05/16
rewatch

How James Gunn managed to maintain an even moderately successful career after penning this is truly a modern marvel. Truly defines the genre of weird cinema. Was an odd viewing with my 8-year-old sister, revisiting something from my childhood only to have it resonate into hers. The freaky dog-demons that plague Mystery Inc are substantially less spookier than I remember (I was ready to relive my childhood spooks) and the film as a whole acted as a reminder why I hate Rowan Atkinson. The recurring allusions to stoner culture in small excerpts from Shaggy and Scooby’s lives are the greatest thing about this. ★★½

Dogs in Space (1986) dir. Richard Lowenstein
07/05/16

Continuing the completely unintentional dog trend for the night (I do love dogs though) came possibly the greatest hidden gem in Australian cinema. Lowenstein’s Dogs in Space serves itself up as an unconventional Australian mid-point between Altman’s Nashville (1975) and Linklater’s Dazed and Confused (1993) (a triple bill to die for), and as he navigates the trashy crevasses of late-70s suburban Melbourne he manufactures the mood of youth in ways I’ve seen no other Aussie drama do (we’ll leave Snowtown out of this). The late Michael Hutchence (a very torn and sultry Michael Hutchence at that) is faaaaaantastic here, and makes me a little sad he didn’t further pursue a little acting on the side. ★★★★

The Master (2012) dir. Paul Thomas Anderson
09/05/16
rewatch

Was inspired to revisit this following the release of Radiohead’s latest record due to Jonny Greenwood’s contribution to the film’s score, who, continuing his sonic collaboration with the latter portion of PTA’s filmography, strikes out some uneven, fiery and disconnected strings which scold the film in an unnerving fashion. The blu of this look unreal on my brand new Samsung. ★★★★½

Grizzly Man (2005) dir. Werner Herzog
10/05/16

An absolutely phenomenal work of art curated by Herzog, not only a tragic tale of human arrogance but a frightening insight into a man’s utter obsession with the natural world; Herzog’s voiceover is divine, a fitting narrator to a horrifically haunting battle between these two entities. Straight to the top of my favourite docos list. Shook me to my core. “I believe the common denominator of the universe is not harmony, but chaos, hostility, and murder. ★★★★★

Inception (2010) dir. Christopher Nolan
11/05/16
rewatch

Written for Letterboxd: 

A film I can’t help but renew my infatuation with despite all of Nolan’s inherent flaws; exposition layering exposition layering exposition and the safeness of his directorial approach are among the plenitude of annoyances that struck me this revisit, but those the almost perfect rounding of Cobb’s plot (I feel completely indifferent towards Cillian Murphy’s whole bit) and those fleeting moments of heightened drama in the midst of the film’s final, veneered act always seem to pull on my reluctant heartstrings. The backing characters just kinda do things–the star studded ensemble undoubtedly helps boost what would’ve been a stale series of supporting characters otherwise–and although they are just there to serve as pawns in Cobb’s big game they occasionally have their moments of unrestricted joy. This once sat at the top of my favourite films list (it has been yeeeeears since I last watched), and in so many ways remains a most important film to me, a staple in my cinematic love-life, something of a precursor to my now engulfing cinephilia. It’s cheesy, it’s ridiculous, it’s laughable at times and it steps out on its mythology a tad too often but it’s a film that I cherish right now and probably always will–bleh. No rating

STYLE

A film’s style, a director’s style, or even a movement’s style provide the viewer with a plenitude of analytical content and once you latch on to these patterns, a new world of cinema can be unraveled. A film’s style in particular as posited by Bordwell and Thompson refers to the distinctive pattern of techniques we find in a film–may they be choices in mise-en-scene, cinematography, editing or sound–and relates to their overall organisation with in the filmic form. Scorsese hones a very unique style, one replicated in part by many contemporary directors today (David O. Russell, Paul Thomas Anderson) exemplifying the quality and importance of his stylistic influence.

A common Scorsese trait is to tend to the story of a single, desperate character, burgeoning on the edges of a certain social group, and to track the intricacies of their movements; usually following them up as they rise (sometimes literally) through the ranks and always following them down as they descend into the pit of madness they themselves curated and their exile from their chosen (sometimes the greater) society. As acclaimed Aussie film critic David Stratton writes “There’s so much information stored inside him it’s as though he’s bursting at the seams; he talks in a rapid-fire style as though he doesn’t have enough time to describe everything he knows. He’s like a character in a 1930s movie.” Such personal characteristics are directly channeled into the style of his films; their crammed nature and extended runtimes are simply homes for the plethora of information and detail Scorsese feels the need he has to convey.

Movies I’ve watched this week – 06/05/16

Week #9. This week, I passed up the opportunity to see SaloThe Grand Illusion, and Foolish Wives all in 35mm and chose to go see a 70-minute long jazz session and a drunken screening of American Psycho played on a projected through a laptop in the backyard of a bar. I don’t regret it.

 

The Secret of Nimh (1982) dir. Don Bluth
02/05/16
rewatch

Written for Letterboxd: 

A film which by name alone reminds me so much of my time at primary school; I vividly remember my teacher reading the original book to us as we lazed on the classroom floor in the afternoons. It seems I took a particular interest in it, and somehow convinced mum or dad to rent this out (more than likely on VHS). My childhood was no short of haunting, animated tales of the animal kingdom’s underbelly (I’m looking at you, Watership Down). As a kid, I remember this differing greatly from the book, and oddly enough now I barely have any recollection of the majority of events that unfold here (I saw scenes in my head that don’t even happen; I guess I’ll take that as a testament O’Brien’s original writing). Moments that struck me with that sweet, sweet nostalgia tended to surround Jeremy the Crow and his jerky, almost dance-like animation (“If I was anywhere near a cat, I’d be sneezing my brains out” and his subsequent sneezing fit is permanently imprinted in my mind) and the rat’s transformation sequence. I think I can attribute my first knowledge of pneumonia to Timmy’s case of it too, this plot point stays lodged in my brain. Radiating confidence from its very first frame, throughout its well-rounded ~80 minute runtime, and keeps this light on until its very last. ★★★★

Jazz ’34 (1997) dir. Robert Altman
02/05/16

Written for Letterboxd:

In one of my previous Altman reviews, I likened his films to a live concert:

a profound sensory experience, loud and unforgiving, and always inhabited by some of the most absurd people you’ve ever seen–and you can’t help but savour every moment

and here, the film literally is just that. 70 minutes of unstoppable, unshakable, foot-tapping, free-flowing jazz deliciousness interspersed with fleeting anecdotal jazzy (for lack of a better word) voiceover so silky smooth it could melt your ears right off the sides of your face. When a director has the power to house a ~100-person strong cinema with a film like this, it can truly be said that he is a maverick and master of American cinema. Bless you, Robert Altman. ★★★★★, I don’t give a damn.

The Age of Innocence (1993) dir. Martin Scorsese
03/05/16

Written for Letterboxd:

Cinema of the voice, where dialogue is constant, always veiled in lies and irises, and clouded head to toe in elaborately layered attires in a film which feels at once the most and least Scorsese-y. Moves at a pace which burns so swiftly though its runtime that I can’t help but harbour an eternal appreciation for long-time Scorsese collaborator Thelma Schoonmaker whose editing and pacing truly shines right here and now. Rapid, successive dissolves add to the film’s flourishing visual tone which is so obviously (and not particularly detrimentally) a 90s rendition of late 19th century America. More cinematic than its illusory poster would suggest.

Written for my blog, now: 

I was the only person in my cinema class who ‘liked’ this? I’ve read criticisms that say that this film is just 3 blocks of wood talking, which is a great laugh, and I can totally understand why people would struggle to find enjoyment in this. I’m still confused as to why it appealed to me so much; I had to wake myself up for the 8:30am screening, breakfast-less, totally not in the mood for a 140-minute period piece drama (my least favourite genre) and I loooooooooooved it. They’re screening this in about a month’s time at ACMI in 35mm, so you’ll be seeing me there. ★★★★

American Psycho (2000) dir. Mary Harron 
04/05/16

Shoutout to Nighthawks Open Air Cinema in Collingwood for delivering the goods; attended this free, cutesy little screening in the back garden/patio area of the bar with some mates and had a ball. You’ll be seeing me in a fortnight’s time, Nighthawks. I kinda love American Psycho. For a fleeting period it sat as my all time favourite, and while my tastes have definitely expanded tenfold it still holds a little sweet spot in my heart. And it’s hilarious; the effect that watching something with an eager crowd has on your enjoyment is revolutionary. Marry me, Christian Bale, you handsome psycho you. ★★★★★

The Sounds of Silence

Sound–the underappreciated little brother of video, of image. Just yesterday I helped a friend out on his short film, a situation where I was in control of sound recording, and I’ve since come around (in combination with another interview project I completed for class) to the importance of the medium. It’s a fidgety, delicate element of cinema and one that requires the greatest of care–as anyone who’s worked on anything surrounding it is sure to know.

As a Robert Altman devotee, I can speak for the value of the medium; Altman was renowned for his accomplishments in sound in cinema, producing a multitrack recording technique which presented overlapping dialogue from his multiple actors, wholly emphasising a balance between style and realism in the sonic area. It wasn’t uncommon in an Altman production for all actors on set to be hooked up to a mic, and many never knew whether they were being recorded or not.

A small note from Bordwell and Thompson’s reading this week struck me as particularly interesting, something I had possibly noticed in passing when watching big action blockbuster films: “Most contemporary sound mixers drop in about a half-second of silence just before explosions and other loud noises.” It seems like a deathly obvious thing but its ingenious power can truly be felt in films like Fury Road or Blackhat.

Vivre sa vie‘s sound strikes a balance between naturalistic (dialogue, environmental sound–many French New Waves catered to this style) and highly artificial (scoring), and this contrast has only left me wanting to follow Godard’s works only more.

My body is an ugly masterpiece that lives off the beauty of sound.” – Chad Sugg

Serendipity: I’ll allow it

Well, well, well: never thought I’d find myself here.

Today I had planned to grind through some serious research, note-taking and other general uni related study in order to leave time tomorrow for a shoot my friend had asked me to help out on for his short film (Film & TV course at Swinburne) when BANG BANG he hits me up at 11:39am with a message: “MIGHT NEED YOU TO COME HELP WITH SOUND LATER TODAY IF YOU FINISH YOUR WORK SOMEONE DROPPED OUT”. And here I am now, 8:50pm, home sweet home, more fulfilled than ever (I even tried Korean food). How’s that for serendipity.

Even then, that’s not the serendipitous part I was intending to write about; this came when it started raining after we arrived on location. And BANG BANG, we found ourselves shooting downstairs, in one of Swinburne’s cute little cafes. The new location was perfect, better than it ever could have been in the gray-walled prison-esque original rooftop area of campus that the original shooting had intended to occur at. Thanks, Media One. Thanks, rain. Thanks in advance, chiropractor who will fix my back after the pain it suffered through holding up a shotgun mic for extended durations.