Thursday’s Notes – Bogost Qs

Today’s class was at long last an eye-opening one, Adrian asking the class for questions on Bogost’s writing made his philosophical ramblings all the more tangible, a comforting experience. Groups, cool. Assignments, cool. Understanding, cool.

Below are some notes I took that needn’t worry you.

  •  Object-Orientated-Ontology:
    • ontology: interested in what things are, what something is. Mainly focused on humans.
    • OOO: interested in separating humans from the centre.
      • things are the centre, not people.
    • premise: no more pyramids.
    • diamond analogy. many faces (facets), some recognised by others. Facets recognise facets on other things.
    • Infinite. Expands infinite in terms of what it can relate to.
    • Facets will come to our attention depending on different situations, eg. being in this room vs falling off a cliff (gravity, the ground, etc.)
  • Flat ontology:
    • related to OOO.
    • Lists advocated as methodology. Lists are flat.
  • Tiny ontology:
    • Unit Operations: like Lego bricks. Assembling a group of things into something, eg. students in a group = class = Unit Operation. Classes together = University.
    • Units don’t hold hierarchy.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *