Upon completion of this studio I would like to have more refined technical skills; both in the hands on shooting aspect (including the strenuous pre-production aspects, especially relating to time management) and editing aspect (I have a couple of years experience with Premiere Pro but even then I find myself only utilising its basic features – improvements in organisation is definitely a key area). I usually find myself operating cameras on their most basic functions so I hope to learn how to control the manual functions of the equipment to maximise my creative potential. The creation (or explosion!) of a short genre film is the thing I look forward to but dread the most, because it will be by far the most ambitious project given to me so far, but I hope that in the end I at least learn something from my achievements (or mistakes).
Film is something I hold very dear and is something which continually draws my excitement – there isn’t much I find better than watching the credits roll after watching great movie for the first (or second, or third, etc.) time. I am extremely interested in the potential of film and I hope this studio strengthens my understanding of both film and genre theory. I am keen on possessing a broader knowledge on the histories of certain genres and being able to properly identify and analyse their key features and tropes by the conclusion of the studio. Class discussions on thoughts about the weekly films is another thing I am looking forward to and the various opinions and discussions that come out of them will surely act to enrich my interpretations.
Monthly Archives: July 2016
Phantom of the Paradise Case Study
In 1974 Brian De Palma birthed Phantom of the Paradise, an amalgamation of horror, music, fantasy and comedy which finds its interesting aspects in its splicing of a range of genres.
The film’s particular arrangement as a musical (featuring a soundtrack written entirely by Paul Williams) breaks genre conventions; Phantom doesn’t adhere to typical musical conventions where characters break out into song in a sporadic attempt to express their feelings. Rather, as the film posits itself as a take on the music industry, each song exists within the narrative and is predominantly performed in a stage setting to an audience within the film rather than to the viewer.
Making connections to both the horror and comedy genres, De Palma’s references in the film stem from two works, the first being Psycho (1960) where he begins his homages to Hitchcock’s oeuvre. De Palma rebuilds the notorious shower murder scene as horror but repurposes its climax for the sake of comedy; instead of a knife, the ‘killer’ wields a plunger and warms his ‘victim’ of an impending doom. His second citation comes from The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari (1920), in which a goth band perform a song dressed in the likeness of Cesare the Somnambulist. Here, De Palma again places a horror icon within a new context: as a prop within a musical production. Additionally in the following scene, the titular Phantom strikes down a singer in the middle of his performance and in turn characterises an intertwining and reevaluation of both the musical and the horror film.
De Palma naturally adheres to horror conventions in the film too, often slowing the film down from musical to allow for moments of suspense, but it’s the breakaway from the norms that separates Phantom from the traditional musical.