PB4 Rough Cut feedback

We presented our rough cuts today in class and I’m happy to report we had a positive review. The group also had their first look at the project and they seemed pretty satisfied with the result, even if the sound quality wasn’t up to scratch. Now all I need to focus on is adding some coverage via found footage. Also polishing some finer details such as jump cuts, contrast balance consistency and adding titles. Hopefully the group can help me out with the reference list and some background noise and we should be smooth sailing.

Here are some pics of myself engaging and having fun:

Screen Shot 2016-05-25 at 12.07.29 pm Screen Shot 2016-05-25 at 12.08.04 pm

the duality of man

                        the duality of man

Editing time sos

Today I’m editing the rough cut for our PB4 and things are going pretty well. Much better than expected. I’ve definitely hit a wall re: stress, even though I’m studying media and all my problems could have been avoided. Give me a break though, it’s my first semester and I’m doing pretty well tbh. I just need a nap.

I’m using Premiere Pro as per usual, and every time I edit I learn a little more. However I probably didn’t go into the audio syncing the right way. I got too ahead of myself and started cutting out dead air before I had synced up the sound and image. So now I’m truly stuffed unless I get that sweet software that does it for you. Unfortunately I’m not as tech savvy as I thought. Luckily the audio quality isn’t as poor as we imagined when we were forced to record on an iPhone.

a newspaper with sexy legs

a newspaper with sexy legs

Shooting pb4

today we show the video component for PB4. I’ve compiled a fair bit of found footage and made a short intro to the video, and now I have 48 minutes of video and 48 minutes of separate audio to edit and sync. Woo hoo.
It’s just for the rough cut though, and hopefully the group will all take a turn editing so it doesn’t end up being completely my responsibility and ultimately failure.
We managed to have a two camera set up, good lighting and adequate staging. The only obstacle we faced was the sound quality. Not only are two visuals hard enough to sync with audio, but we had to record an audio track on James’ iPhone so it would sound clearer than the MC50 mic. Even the lapel was a struggle. Hopefully I can use the software that sync’s audio and visual cues automatically to save some time.

The video is pretty funny and engaging. There’s going to be a lot of information in short period of time but it’s going to pay off. Here’s a sneak peak:

hacked it.

hacked it.

 

Audiences vs Broadcasters: Where does the power lie?

In our project brief 4 we have settled on the above question to explore within our audio essay. We have decided to use a debate structure between someone representing “big broadcasters” versus “user generated media makers”. This will hopefully make our essay engaging and comedic, I’m thinking an ABC2 production aesthetic. Something Mark Fennell would be on ya know.

The arguments we’re discussing is the power shift between broadcasters and audiences, with key topics being media ownership corrupting news sources with a case study being the ‘stalking’ of Julia Gillard, and the media coverage of the prime ministership. This also plays into big broadcasters pushing their ideas of nationalism, which is often conservative to meet the alignments of the Packers/Murdochs.
Another case would be advertising. The argument is that big broadcasters are dominated by advertising, whereas small media productions who try to stray from advertisers still need sponsorships and product placements to be visible when there is so much UGC.
Finally is the Fandom point. Audiences have power over media production, yet on the defence, have little power in the “real world”.

Hopefully this will come together in a concise and clear way!!!