Technology and Mediums

It’s interesting to think how each medium has different characteristics that make it distinct; physically, socially, psychologically. Books are intimate, and one of the few experiences we can have alone. It’s so much less likely that someone has read the same book as you compared to watching the same tv show or movie. I think it’s really special talking about a book with someone who has also read it, because it’s so rare. You immerse yourself in a text, which you use your own imagery to illustrate and then it ends. It’s a pretty unique experience.
Not to sound too pretentious.

It touches on media languages; the expectations of a medium we have, and the way we read it. To use TV as an example’ we understand it’s l;languages through time; how long the ads run for, spaces between ad breaks, cliff hangers, closure, lounge rooms, laptops, alone or with family. etc. These aren’t only languages but media environments. Ways to describe and create experiences.

Interesting questions raised in the lecture discussed historical texts for prediction of the future. These were;
how does technology rewrite the history
how does it change ourselves?

I believe the history of a medium form does not go from one technology to the other for no reason other than an advance.  Its the social and cultural history that motivates innovation. After the invention of the telephone social patterns were disrupted. Each time we lose a social capacity to an invention, we gain one with eh next technological advance in it’s area.

We briefly touched on the crossing of class values, exclusivity, accessibility of technology. An example was the digital divide in the 90s which defined who has access to information, who is left behind. By leaving behind poorer people with low technical infrastructure we create another social education class. This furthers into the political gearing behind technology and the ways it defines our world. but thats a topic for another day.

Media Institutions

picture via Sunshine Coast Daily.

picture via Sunshine Coast Daily.

Earlier in the year, we were suggested to write a blog post on the nationalistic narratives surrounding ANZAC day. The first thought that popped into my head was a reference to ex-SBS reporter Scott Mcintyre’s controversial tweets from 2015 ‘disrespecting’ the honour of the ANZAC tribute.

I didn’t want to comment an opinion, this is my professional blog and from McIntyre’s prompt dismissal from SBS, I would hate to have my professional record tainted in the same way. However, rather than discussing the content of the tweets, I will discuss the ways in which McIntyre was expelled from an institution for not sharing the same values.

The SBS has long been a left leaning corporation being the forefront for Australia’s World news. However, this political alignment did not lean far enough to support McIntyre’s attack on one of the nation’s most patriotic and well-revered days of respect, leading him to be sacked. This is an example of a member of collectivist, institutional thought pushing his individualism and ultimately tainting the company’s brand.

SBS’s statement read:
“Mr McIntyre’s actions have breached the SBS Code of Conduct and social media policy and as a result…SBS apologises for any offence or harm caused by Mr McIntyre’s comments which in no way reflect the views of the network.”

As this did not reflect their views, SBS stated that McIntyre did not represent the shared values of the institution he was working for and breached his Code of Conduct as a member of their staff. Their sacking was then an expression of an institution’s need to regulate and structure the brand identity of the network.

Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/national/ww1/sbs-presenter-scott-mcintyre-sacked-over-inappropriate-anzac-day-tweets-20150426-1mtbx8.html#ixzz48my9puLV

Everyone PLEASE enrol to vote!!!

The federal election is coming up and it’s time to head down to the booths and try to fix Australia!!! I was under 18 during the last federal election so I didn’t bother about enrolling. It was only until last night, 11 days before enrolment closes, that I realised I was not enrolled.

No, the government does not automatically enrol you, even though the technology is there. If you move from your electorate you must update your details. Please I can’t stress enough ow important the youth vote is in Australia. We have the power to change our government entirely, so please, even if you hate all the candidates, do not donkey vote or waste your democratic rights ‘making a stand’ by not voting. Look, if you genuinely don’t care, just pop down to your local primary school, number some boxes (ALL BOXES) and treat yourself to a Lamington. You’ve earned it kid.

this is truly an inspirational pic

this is truly an inspirational pic

2/3 voters support Labor or The Greens and yesterday I stood with Adam Bandt and Alex Bhatal at the education rally against university cuts, an issue directly affecting RMIT.

Enrolment closes at 8pm on the 23rd of May 2016.
You can add your name to roll, or you can check your enrolment details here: http://www.aec.gov.au/enrol/

I can’t post this because my internet is too slow

E.T phone-homo

E.T phone-homo

Today we briefly discussed the readings, which explored the issues on internet connection in Australia and the National Broadband Network. It was interesting the hear the views of my classmates. Everyone beraded Telstra for their stronghold on the copper wire connection we have now. So strong that our current connection speed lags behind countries like Iceland. Gotta download some Bjork somehow though.
I have been a Testra mobile customer for 7 years and I am more than ready to change. Not only did they filibuster our chance for the NBN, but recently they revoked their stance on gay marriage to provide internet and connection services for the Church. The monetisation of Mardi Gras and gay rights by corporations is disturbing enough, but only more when apathy of big businesses is revealed.

I remember taking a Making Networked Media class in my first year at La Trobe and discussing the military ties that the internet has. How the internet was invented to be used as a communication service between military bases in the chance of a nuclear war. This led me on a wikipedia trawl about the dark net, transhumanism, BioArt, the Orion Project interstellar generational voyages which I won’t blog about because I am too scared.

Cw: Ignorance; why do so may people misinterpret Trigger Warnings?

tw: rape mention, food, misogyny, violence, abuse

A content or trigger warning “is a very simple statement at the beginning of an article, film, or comic that lets the audience know that something potentially distressing will appear in the content they’re about to consume.” Amy McCarthy, Bustle Magazine.

It may seem silly seeing an article pop up on Facebook and a commenter asking for someone to place a content warning for Food. Or a classmate leaving a lecture because a documentary on alcoholism is about to play.  It may even seem ‘oppressive’ to you, for a 3 second message, address or mention before a class watches violently jarring footage of a women being racially targeted and choked to the point of suffocation. How inconvenient.

A recovering sufferer of an eating disorder, who may have purged the very meal shown on screen may not be able to focus in class after seeing the image. A rape victim might struggle listening to the hopeless pleas of a character on Game of Thrones as they are sexually abused, a soundtrack of the night that ruined their lives. From chastising trauma victims for preventing a breakdown, you are ultimately saying “I don’t care about your pain”.

Yes the world has no padding or protection, but the world is hard enough for survivors of trauma. If you have not suffered trauma, take it from me, someone who can get ‘triggered’.  When I enter a classroom, I don’t expect to see violent misogyny. I would hope I am entering a safe space, where I can put my trauma away for an hour and discuss something else. I expect a place where I won’t suffer a panic attack, become restless and lose sleep at night. I would like the option to excuse myself before I fall into a bout of insomnia.
Honestly, the lack of support from my classmates, who are young progressive people, is isolating.

Yet, would this conversation exist around ex-servicemen? Would their trauma be considered petty, frivolous or an inconvenience? Maybe we should consider rewriting the image of PTSD from the returned soldier to maybe a woman? In the US alone, 1 in 8 women are likely to develop PTSD, making it twice as likely for a woman to develop the disorder than a man.The most likely victim of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder are sufferers of child abuse, rape victims, and sexual assault. Perhaps the face of PTSD should be the children who have watched their families perish, or have been abused under the arms of returned soldiers.

Give people who suffer every day the option to sleep at night. Trigger warnings aren’t a joke. The fact that they have had to change their title to content warnings due to ignorant naysayers speaks enough. Let people keep their self preservation and their sanity, even if it costs you 3 seconds of your life every time .

This comic anonymously published on The Nib summarises trigger warnings for better understanding:

1*fjSYAAWKCUlQmoAGcrcXuw

continue reading at https://thenib.com/trigger-warning-breakfast-c6cdeec070e6#.gk25nrsz2

 

 

Audiences vs Broadcasters: Where does the power lie?

In our project brief 4 we have settled on the above question to explore within our audio essay. We have decided to use a debate structure between someone representing “big broadcasters” versus “user generated media makers”. This will hopefully make our essay engaging and comedic, I’m thinking an ABC2 production aesthetic. Something Mark Fennell would be on ya know.

The arguments we’re discussing is the power shift between broadcasters and audiences, with key topics being media ownership corrupting news sources with a case study being the ‘stalking’ of Julia Gillard, and the media coverage of the prime ministership. This also plays into big broadcasters pushing their ideas of nationalism, which is often conservative to meet the alignments of the Packers/Murdochs.
Another case would be advertising. The argument is that big broadcasters are dominated by advertising, whereas small media productions who try to stray from advertisers still need sponsorships and product placements to be visible when there is so much UGC.
Finally is the Fandom point. Audiences have power over media production, yet on the defence, have little power in the “real world”.

Hopefully this will come together in a concise and clear way!!!

Fandom meets Activisim

screm-de-la screm I haven’t posted for a while.

We are progressing well in our PB4. In class I discussed the meanings of Fandoms as an example of audience control over media. Some of the topics I will investigate are the fanbases power over television programmes, and the political alignments of the fans who are now linked into the writing and plotlessness of the stories. You can assess shows like Orphan Black or The 1OO or even movies such as The Danish Girl and Stonewall as being manipulated by the viewership. Some of these examples have suffered tremendously in the box office due to the public boycotting the film for historical inaccuracy which is offensive to the minorities the film is aimed towards.

Many of the articles I researched showed fandom turning to activism. How fans who have similarities beyond the show put their thought to activism, social justice and progressive thought. However this is a double edged sword. Different media results in different political alignments and not all are progressive (Duck Dynasty)
A case study I found were the American activists who protested the Russian LGBT propaganda laws were fans of Lady Gaga, and her history of advocating for LGBT rights saw her banned from performing in Russia, and subsequently being investigated for tax evasion by the Russian government. Her audience and fandom then began campaigning for freedom for the Russian Queer community. However, many of the studies show that Audiences have an extent to their effectiveness on a political scale, one that does not match the influence they have within the politics of media making. There we draw the line between effectiveness and effort.

 

how to focus in public

i went to a concert by myself last nite
 
and the girl opening broke her bass string
 
so she got this mic and upped the reverb while the roadie was fixing it
 
and she put on this miranda july voice
 
and was like
omg i saw on ur snap s
 
omg
not everybody will love you. not everyone will love you and you have to accept this You could be the ripest, juiciest plum, but not everyone…..likes plums
 
so you can become a banana. you could try being a banana for a change,
 
but not everyone likes bananas
 
so you should be satisfied…. being a plum
 
and i was like WHOA
omg that’s beautiful???
 
i love that you went by yourself i can relate so much to that
it was liberating tbh
 
like i didn’t have to worry if the other person was enjoying the music
yes! i love that!
 
i was enjoying it and it was all that mattered
 
u can focus all ur attention on absorbing the music/film etc
sometimes when ur like alone things just seem to resonate.

Livin’ as a post-broadcast kid

This weeks lecture looked into Audiences in further depth. The part I will be analysing is specifically the Broadcast Era in which I’ve grown up. In this,  I want to address free to air television.
Through my personal experience I felt the end of the broadcast era in 2008. This is when I was 13 and my personal interest turned away from watching television with my family to seeking entertainment and information through other sources.
I no longer wanted to fit myself into the nuclear family, whom prime time television was aimed towards. However, now as an adult who no longer exhibits (as much) teen angst, I want to return to sitting with my family watching prime tv.

Unfortunately, during my distance from free to air, the media landscape shifted into the post broadcast era, and the chances I will be able to return are gone. Media has changed too much, and the power and routine of broadcast television is over.
I want to analyse how all the people growing up in a post broadcast era  have lost the ability to reconcile with free to air TV and thus turn to streaming. How media makers have less pressure to find that sought after 6.30 time slot. How audiences exist on two levels: those watching, and those who will watch later.

I have a strong nostalgia for being 13 and absorbing all the television I was shown, whether I wanted to see it or not. Those wasted hours watching tv until the show you set out to watch originally comes on. Waiting months for a “fast-tracked” episode of Gossip Girl, yet having to endure a re-run of Two and A Half Men. I don’t know if I loved it or hated it.

These days I find myself watching 3 different tv shows, none of them broadcast on television. The TV I bought in the living room is covered in a layer of dust. I like to put it on when I cook just for ambience. Broadcast media has lost it’s power, and I am intrigued to know why.

PS there is something about this aesthetic that I’m obsessed with. Like it’s a timepiece for my childhood. The longer the video goes, the more and more ‘2005’ it becomes.