Whatchu Saying?

Angus disagrees with the idea that technology determines everything. Instead he hypothesises that above technology are the creators and below; the consumers, which together forms the three stages for how technology progresses through time.

Evan introduces his new blog category – Adrian Vs Betty, in replacement of Symposium updates. Accurate description I think. However during this Symposium, the two intellectual boxing opponents agree on language having alternative interpretations. Evan explains how the term ‘LOL’ can be interpreted in a variety of different ways as an example to demonstrate the implausibility of the Magic Bullet Theory.

Luke recognises the multiple benefits of computers; the convenience they create for day-to-day tasks and educational benefits. He decides that the benefits outweigh the possible stresses caused by such modern technology. I would agree that certain technological developments have made it easier to perform certain tasks. However as an overall concept, such tasks must have also been created through the same technological developments, so maybe its like: “I need to buy it because I can” and computers make these tasks easier but without computers they may not be a need for the task. This probably sounds very hippie as its bordering on notions of the ease of times of hunting and gathering, etc – a life without contemporary tasks created by technology.

Apple Announcement Decreases Student’s Ability in School

So clearly a key focus of this course is to embrace the variety of opportunity and educational benefits the internet offers to us students. So I find myself, only due to the instantaneous sharing abilities of the internet, awake… watching Apple’s live announcement of new gear… at 3:00AM…. before my Network tute starts at 8:30AM… So I’ll be one step ahead of my sensible peers who decided to sleep, in the race to keep up with ever growing digital world. However it’s likely I’ll be far behind in my absorbing of tutorial information due to the nature of the brain functioning on <4hrs of sleep.

 

p.s. I am actually watching calibrating colour bars and wishing I went to sleep earlier. You win this round Networked Media

Colour Bars

 

Update: Got it working but it’s just too temperamental for me right now. Over and out…

Interactive Narratives = Loss of Author’s Intentions

Douglas introduces us to the notion of books without pages – a metaphor for the opportunities digital media brings to story telling. Interactive narratives are thus born through digital media, but particularly through networked media a narrative can be formed providing various alternate pathways and an interactive experience. Therefore, separate pieces of an interactive narrative can be connected by the user in particular ways that create individual meaning. Meaning the original intentions of the author for the meaning of a text can be completely changed as new associations are formed by various users. This shows how networked media increases the ambiguity of the author’s message.

Could Ted Nelson be the answer for the privacy of celebrity nudes?

I’m sure the majority of you are aware of last week’s iCloud scandal that resulted in many photos of nude celebrities such as Jennifer Lawrence and Kate Upton being leaked to the world wide web. Right well as it turns out iCloud was not breached, but rather individual accounts were targeted and hacked. However the fact that the images were stored in a remote storage server (believed to be floating high in the sky somewhere, when it’s likely to be sitting in a giant server building in the US), means that the images are far more vulnerable. Ted Nelson formulated a new model for how online networks could be structured called the Nelsonian Network, as discussed in this week’s symposium. Nelson’s vision requires each internet user to have a physical hard drive located within the home (for example), to be used in replacement of remote servers. In addition, the Nelsonian Network would be comprised of two-way links, instead of one-way links. Meaning the context of every material is preserved as every copied material knows where it is and when it is being used. Does this mean the Nelsonian Network could have prevented last week’s photo leak? Although there would still be of course, a way to duplicate material without creating a link in the Nelsonian Network, the presence of personal storage in replacement of online storage would have added an extra level of security, making the task of hacking the photos of others far more challenging as it would hacking require remote access.

Whatchu saying?

Sam is stoked for the release of White Bird in a Blizzard after finding out that the film is directed by Gregg Araki, the man responsible for directing one of Sam’s all time favourite films: Mysterious Skin. He likes Araki’s unconventional filmmaking style and proceeds to give his review of Mysterious Skin in this post, claiming its relevant to the course because “networked media is pretty mysterious” haha I love it.

Michael joins Instagram and speculates that each new digital platform he uses, designed to be a online representation of one’s character, may actually be forming an increasingly disjointed reflection of his original self, spread across the extremities of the digital world.

Mitch reviews some of his work from ‘writing media texts’ last semester, picking up on small mistakes and things that could have been done differently. Overall a very intriguing image Mitch, good use of the rule of thirds and at the end of the day I think it is great to learn from old work because if we aren’t able to notice previous mistakes how in the world can we improve?

The Expendables Became Expended

Expendables 1 = awesome!

Expendables 2 = awesome!

Expendables 3 = awes…

I suppose one does not go to a Hollywood action classic like the Expendables for deep storytelling and engaging narration in particular, however I still found that the Expendables 3 did not deliver. Barney Ross (Sylvester Stallone) forsakes his team and attempts to replace them with a younger crew which brings the destructive momentum and hilarious nature of the original two movies to a grinding halt. This is completely out of character for Barney Ross and defies the tradition the Expendables had going.

 

Image Source: Warm Jello

Texts and Hypertexts

Isn’t it interesting the way text has transformed over time and taken many forms throughout history in the transfer of information? From text used as a method of recording information (in the case of scribing), as a medium for signalling or illustrating particular situations (in the case of signs), as a means of creating stories, sharing fiction and non-fictional texts (in the case of novels), and as a means of communication (in the case of the letter and later digital messaging). Text is a large part of modern human existence and as highlighted by Jay Bolter, the structure of text has also evolved throughout history. The post 1960s electronic text structure has enabled the use of hypertexts, which are defined as a text that contains links to other texts. This concept is interesting considering it transforms text from a material that communicates information in one way or another, to a gateway into new information. Hypertexts are the basis of contemporary digital literacy and embedded (no pun intended) throughout the entire functionality of the internet as we know it.

What exactly is hypertext you ask?

Here you go                             — (a little bit of free self promotion can’t hurt)

Nate

No Copyright on Creativity

This week we focused on copyright law and creative commons. Copyright law falls under civil law and is designed to ensure that a creator’s content is not used by others, without permission. As soon as someone copies or exploits the work of another person they are in infringement of copyright. My experience on YouTube has shown me that the site enables members to upload copyright material as long as the content is not monetized by the member; meaning they would financially benefit from the content. YouTube will identify the content (music for example) as the work of another creator, but will not stop the user from distributing it. Below is one of my videos that originally got muted by YouTube for featuring copyright audio, however the decision was evoked and the audio returned due to the fact I was not benefiting financially from the video.

This leads to me realise that the boundaries of copyright law are not clear black and white. One of the readings this week proves this point exactly:

“There are also a number of fair dealing exceptions to copyright infringement, including fair dealing for the purpose of criticism and review, parody and satire, research and study, and reporting the news” (Arts Law Centre of Australia).

This shows that there are considerations in place within the law, excepting the reproduction of copyright material for particular uses. However in the commercial industry, copyright law is pretty crystal clear; you can’t use or even recreate something similar to another person’s material. However what if your creative recreation of unoriginal material can be considered better than the original in some respects, or at least just as worthy of distribution. Unfortunately copyright law prevents this distribution of creativity and instead enables cultural monopolists to dominate the cultural market. Music; publishing; imaging; and movie industries decide how to distribute the content they get their hands on, removing cultural and artistic exchange from the people. Imagine a world without copyright. This thought I’m sure scares you at first and that’s because:

“Cultural monopolists desperately want us to believe that without copyright we would have no artistic creations and therefore no entertainment. That is nonsense. We would have more, and more diverse ones” (NY Times 2005).

Removing the restrictions of copyright would create a market that is accessible for everyone, a level playing field and it would also protect creativity within the public domain. Creating a market built around the success of cultural and artistic competition, providing the public with a rich variety of creative alternatives.

That Nine to Five Feel

School and work within our society is based on an industrial model, premised from the nineteenth century. Restricted to sunlight for visibility, the people of the nineteenth century based their active hours around the cycle of the sun. After electricity was introduced in the twentieth century, society still maintains the same work structure. Even though electricity removes the boundaries of daytime for working and nighttime for sleeping. Today we still follow this pattern as schooling and business hours are considered to occur between the time of 9am – 5pm. However:

“A growing amount of research finds that teenagers are wired to sleep later and can benefit from school days that start later” (Wall Street Journal 2014).

This has been proven by countless amounts of research and shows that the post industrial age that we live in is comprised of occupations that no longer benefit from an industrial work model. For example, media students such as myself are preparing for jobs that require later working hours. I’d like to become a film editor and the nature of the occupation is associated with late night working. Maybe this is because daytime footage is provided to an editor at the end of a day, required for the following day, edited, leaving them no choice. However potentially, editors may work late just because there may not be a time constraint, demonstrating a preference for some to work at night. As Adrian mentioned in our first symposium: students are not at university to learn the content, but rather to learn the way of thinking that is most relevant to the given industry. Although many jobs such as engineering and business management require 9am-5pm work, validating our industrial model of education, clearly other occupations do not. Therefore education models should follow the principle that learning must be practiced in the same environment as it will be delivered, allowing students to attend education at various times.

 

The city never sleeps:

foottop long exp

© Nethaniel Rochester

Start school later

Last week’s symposium highlighted the structure of our school and work time table as being based on an industrial model approach. Derived from a 20th century model premised on factory line-like behavior, which is just no longer relevant to our society. Studies have shown that individuals have different concentration rhythms in which school beginning at different times could be much more efficient and beneficial to some. As I sit at my computer to write this blog post, its 3:11AM and I dread getting up for uni in the morning. I consistently end up completely the majority of my work after midnight and that’s just the way it’s always been. In an age of such online dependency and network literacy, I can’t help but imagine the possibility of the lectures at RMIT being recorded and posted on blackboard, or even conducted through Skype. This would allow not only the student, but the lecturer to remain within the comforts of their own home and carry out their end of the educational arrangement at a time most appropriate to them, allowing them to maximise their concentration cycle. Could this be the future of education as we become more network literate? and/or does this mean that as network literacy increases, physical social interaction decrease? Quite possibly… Maybe I’ll sleep on it, I’m off…

ZZZ

p.s. If the concept of starting school later and studies on sleeping patterns interests you, read this. Don’t worry, it’ll only take you the whole night to read, therefore limiting your sleep and ability to concentrate tomorrow :/