March 2014 archive

Shot Construction

‘Shooting to edit’ means that when you film a scene, you are doing so with the intention of editing different shots together to create a dynamic and smooth scene.

Filming in this way means that you have more control over the coverage of a shot or scene. It allows you to set up the camera and lighting to shoot a particular shot in the way you want, then set up the camera and lighting again to film from a different direction or angle. This means that filmmakers have a variety of shots to choose from during post-production and may pick and choose depending on the performance of the actors or preference of angles.

This method also gives the filmmaker the ability to shoot out of order, so that scenes occurring at the same location at different points in the script, can all be shot at once, rather than having to move back and forth from reoccurring locations.

Shooting to edit also allows filmmakers to have control over the timing of a scene. When editors put the shots together, they can choose to cut quickly between shots which shortens time, or to linger on a shot which elongates time. This is different to using a single long shot covering a scene as it happens in real time, whereas shots filmed from different angles may be edited together to either compress or elongate time.

K-Film: Nostalgia

The K-Film ‘Nostalgia’ uses editing to emphasize elements or the mood of each clip. While not all clips are edited, the ones that are, highlight a bright or coloured light, or integrate a editing filter to demonstrate the mood being portrayed by the makers.

This is the first K-film I’ve seen that has used editing within the clips. The makers make use of the natural lighting, colours, and abstract elements of what they are filming and then emphasize them through editing techniques. The variation between the non-edited clips and the edited clips provides an interesting experience as you aren’t bored by the clips. Some of the clips are in focus, some are out of focus, they use different lights, time of day, locations, framing, camera movement and sound, which makes it an enjoyable film.

While I did enjoy the variations between the clips, the captions that accompanied them made even the lighter and more optimistic clips seem depressing. The captions are possibly song lyrics that describe someone’s struggle to get through life. These give the audience the perspective that the clips are to be viewed in a dark and depressing manner, which does negatively affect the experience of watching the film. This is because the audience is being manipulated to view the film in a certain way, rather than viewing it from their own perspective.

The main frame doesn’t loop, which isn’t much of a problem for the longer clips, but for the much shorter ones it is as it becomes hard to remember or pay attention to them in such a short time span. The music also only plays for the duration of each clip, which hinders the viewing experience as it means there is a break in the film. If the music continued to play even after the clip finished, it wouldn’t feel as disjointed and a reminder to click another clip.

The use of editing in this K-film will be something I think about in terms of my own clips, and how I can use framing and camera movement to make my clips more interesting.

Narrativity and Lists

This week’s readings by Ryan and Bogost discuss the topics of narrative and how to perceive it from a transmedial point of view rather than the classical form of narrative; and lists, in terms of how they contrast narrative.

According to Ryan, the term ‘narrative’ has become so popular in recent times that its meaning has become “diluted”. When one thinks of narrative, they think of the classical form and structure that presents itself in fables and the like. The issue facing a transmedial study of narrative is finding an alternative to the language-based definitions of narrativity that are present in classical narratology.

She quotes Abbott’s belief that narrative is a combination of story and discourse, where story is the event or sequences of events and narrative discourse is how they are represented. In this view, narrative is the textual actualization of a story, whereas story is narrative in the visual form. Ryan continues on from that saying, story is a mental image and cognitive construct that concerns how entities represented relate to each other. Narrative discourse can be distinguished from other text types in the way that it evokes images to the audience or reader’s mind. The reader can recognize the text’s intent to evoke a story in their minds, and depending on the reader’s intent, its message from the sender is either gained or misinterpreted by the reader.

From this text, we can say that while a K-film is a non-narrative film, the narrativity that an audience creates with their own mind through interacting with the film means that it contains some narrative elements, whether accidental or not. The patterns that are formed between the in-keywords and out-keywords of different clips and how they link in the final product, means that the audience will use these patterns to create their own sense of narrative to the film.

Bogost’s description of lists demonstrates how it is different to the way in which language works. While language uses signs to represent things as having definite relationships with each other,  lists divide the things they include, only having the relationship of accumulation between them. While language connects things, lists describe disconnected elements. Because they are so inexpressive (unlike language), lists allow us to represent things in their simplest form without complication.

While this text describes objects/things on a list as not having any relation to one another, the use of Korsakow means that these things/categories are linked to each other to create a pattern. The ability to input your own in-keywords and out-keywords which are then linked by the program to create links between your clips, show that lists, when used in this way, can create relationships between seemingly unconnected things. In order to create as many links as possible between the clips, the challenge is to find the simplest definition of a clip you can, that is common amongst many of your other clips, so that they can be linked by the program. This supports Bogost’s argument that the fact that lists are so inexpressive is a benefit to us.

Spoiler Alert: Pompeii models Titanic

WARNING: MAJOR SPOILERS SPOILED HERE

“Is it just me or is this movie very similar to Titanic?”

This is the question I asked my friends last weekend as we devoured junk food at the drive-ins. Maybe it was the lack of the full Dolby sound experience of a normal cinema, but ‘Pompeii’ quite simply was underwhelming. Yes, admittedly, our decision to watch this film was highly influenced by our desire to admire Jon Snow’s (Kit Harington – but who actually calls him that anyway) amazing six-pack prior to the return of ‘Game of Thrones’ early next month. In that case, I’d like to congratulate the director Paul W. S. Anderson on finally convincing Jon Snow (yes, you have to say it in that accent) to lose the animal coats and fur, and train up to play a buff gladiatior. In terms of the narrative however, I’m afraid he can’t be cogratulated.

The film begins in Britannia, 79 AD where Milo (Snow/Harington) is a gladiator – and a successful one at that. He is, like the other gladiators, a slave, and is transported to Pompeii where there are political issues with the Roman General Corvus (Kiefer Sutherland) who wants to change Pompeii to suit the Romans’ needs. He also wants the young Cassia (Emily Browning) who is quite creeped out by his advances and only has eyes for the bad boy – Milo (don’t we all). There’s some backstory about revenge Milo wishes to seek on his family’s death, and another gladiator Atticus – who’s deep-throated announcements; “It is the mountain” are more comical than prophetic – who wants to secure his freedom from slavery. Behind all of that is the constant, impending doom that Mt Vesuvius signifies.

The geography of the film is quite confusing and can be easily misunderstood – “Wait, where are they?” “Why are they going there?” – were the questions raised between us friends. The motives behind the movements are skipped over quickly and some of the action is a little too convenient in serving the story progression. The character’s motivations aren’t put to the forefront enough either; for example, Milo’s wish to seek revenge is overshadowed by his desire to woo Cassia – a storyline that assumes that because both characters are shown in close-up, looking at one another, that they are instantly in love. There is no real understanding of what draws Milo to Cassia, other than her beauty.

It wasn’t even half way through the film that I recognised the similarities between ‘Pompeii’ and ‘Titanic’, which made me wonder how much of the film’s disaster structure influenced Anderson’s film. The love-story between a poor, arrogant, adventurous and good-looking guy, and a rich, rebellious, and royal girl who is trying to carve out her own life; is almost identical to both films. The fact that they both must try to survive a doomed scenario while everything crumbles around them also occurs in both. Things become even more clearer when the pompous and misogynistic General decides he is going to have Cassia no matter what, even if it means *gasp* killing her one true love, Milo.

Perhaps it just follows the conventions of a disaster film, but the likeness to the famous ‘Titanic’ meant that the film became super predictable for my friends and I. “Oh yep, now she’s going to die”, “I could see that coming from the start”, were all thrown around at important plot points where the twist was more like a typical Hollywood 45 degree turn. Rather than being afraid for the characters, we were hanging out for Atticus’ booming “It is the mountain” announcements to provide some entertainment. The most interesting scene in the film for me is when Milo and Atticus are ambushed in the ring by, basically, an army. The direction of the action and suspense generated was undoubtedly the best part of the film – cue applause. The graphics, and video-game style directing of the action scenes, and of Mt Vesuvius itself must be appreciated, however the narrative was let down in favour of the technical aspect of the film.

If you’ve seen ‘Pompeii’ and still don’t agree with my comparison to ‘Titanic’ then perhaps you should look at the final scene of the film. Trying to escape the wrath of Mt Vesuvius, Milo and Cassia ride horseback, but the poor horse can’t (of course) carry them both to safety. In a complete ‘of course that was going to happen’ moment, Milo tells Cassia to save herself and leave him behind. In a classic ‘there’s not enough room on the door, Rose – except there is’ moment, surprisingly Cassia decides to stay with Milo as they both die together. The emotion portrayed by Di Caprio and Winslet far surpasses that by Harington and Browning, whose chemistry just isn’t there.

Maybe that was the problem all along, there was no real emotion portrayed from the actors to make the plot believable, because trust me I didn’t shed a tear during ‘Pompeii’ but bawled buckets (and still will) during ‘Titanic’.

1 2 3 4