So halfway through reading the Murphie and Potts reading i released i had read it somewhere .. In history and tech. Wow we have a cross over of material and therefore the answer oh how relevant “this shit” is was somewhat justified. Anyone the reading in a sense was very vague on the definitions of both technology and culture. And rightly so i feel. There are multiple definitions and angles to what they are whether it be an artistic or mechanical way. But one thing is for sure both technology and culture have evolved. Then then argument of technodeterminism and symptomatic comes into play. Does technology solely change society or does society influence technology. For me neither, they work in tandem … they must? Surely one can not exist without the other.