Questions from individual reading
categories: Ecologies of Noticing, Journal
ESSAY TITLE: RETHINKING THE ANIMATE, REANIMATING THOUGHT
- Why do they say that “In the animic otology, beings do not simply occupy the world, they inhabit it” (page71)
- How can we relate primacy of movement? ” As soon as a person moves, he or she becomes a line” ( page72)
- “Whenever there is live, there is movement” Why did they say that the sun and the wind is alive? (Page73)
- Can we fully understand the condition of being? (page 68)
- What is logic of inversion and how can we apply it? (Page 68)
- Why do they say that ” Life in the animic ontology is not an emnation but a generation of being, in a world that is not preordained but incipient, forever on the verge of the actual”?
- Why did they say that ” The environment might then be better envisaged as a domain of entanglement”?
- How does tangle affect the meshwork in animic onotology? (Page 71)
- Why is the weather so important in animic ontology? (Page 73)
- Why did they say that ” The way to know the world, is not to open oneself up to it but rather to “grasp” it within a grid of concepts and categories?” (Page 74-75)
- What is the mesh network?
- How can we apply the primacy of movement in a mesh network?
- What can we learn from this chapter?
- How can we apply it in our studio and upcoming project?
- “Whenever there is live, there is movement” Is the river considered alive? Why is this point important?
- Why do they say that ” In the animic ontology, by contract, what is unthinkable is the very idea that life is played out upon the inanimate surface of a read-made world.”
- Why do they say that ‘Yet along with openness comes vulnerability” (Page 74)
- What is animic cosmos? (Page 74)
- What is network thinking and relational perspective? (Page 70)
- Why do they say that life is continuous birth? What do they mean by that? ( Page 69)
- Why do we need to rethink the animate and reanimate thoughts? ( essay title)
- What is the outcome from this concept? What should we expect?
I’ve read the essay 3 times and i find it hard to write a summary about the chapter. It is hard to connect the what the author explains as a whole. I feel that there is a lot of hidden meanings in the essay. Please enlighten me 🙁