Tag Archives: reflection

Final Reflection for Seeing the Unseen

Posted on by
Reply

My studio experience: 

Reflecting back from the start of the semester, I only had a vague idea of what noticing was supposed to be until I had to go through four of the assessments that were assigned to us. Through the tasks that were given to us by Hannah, I was able to develop the skill of noticing both consciously and subconsciously.

From Mason’s reading, he states that intentional noticing occurs through a professional setting such as teaching a lesson, a lecture, a workshop with effort exerted throughout every session where you practice noticing. This reading taught us the art of noticing and how one’s state of mine should be whenever we are noticing certain things – from places, the environment around to the most minuscule of things such as dust, insects, the way the light reflects on objects, etc. Essentially, Mason’s reading iterates that in order to notice, you must improve and enhance your sensitivity to your own gestures, postures whilst also converting your development into research and putting that research to practice. As I can recall from our first ever class discussion, the question was raised about how we can develop the skill of purposefully noticing and if I can recall correctly, some of these suggestions included:

  • Consciously practising it every day  – this can be through photography, videography, etc
  • Research – online, offline, reading
  • Taking notes of your own observation of the world, whether it would be on your phone, notebook, anything

Through these methods, I slowly but surely applied these techniques to my work but the guidelines from the assessment tasks and the weekly tasks also assisted in my journey of noticing. One task that stood out to me, in particular, was from Assesment Three’s Experiments in Noticing. The task was segregated into three parts which, therefore, forced you to really see the bigger picture as you progressed from the first part of your experiment to the third and final part. As I used different mediums throughout the experiment, these were one of my epiphanic moments of realising the different levels of noticing – since I compiled my video and images into collages in Experiment II and Experiment III, this gave a completely different outlook on seeing the environment around me. especially when there are images side by side, allowing you to compare the similarities and differences between both.

Because of this experience, noticing has become a skill that is both beneficial and meddlesome depending on the situation that you want to apply noticing. For example, when making creative media such as music, videos, photographs, noticing becomes a handy skill to have because it allows your future audience to let them see what you saw, what you heard and ultimately, what you felt. That is one of the many perks of noticing. However, constantly notcing and putting effort into insignificant things may place a certain amount of stress on yourself and could even distract your from your daily life such as meditation, other works that do not require noticing, etc. There is an undefined rule about where you should place your energy into noticing but essentially, you should be able to ALSO practice directing the energy of noticing. It is not just about practicing the sole activity but also where you project this skill and how you would be able to switch it on or off. All in all, this my personal and circumstantial experience with noticing so yes, noticing can be an exclusive activity because you are using your own willpower to see the unseen.

My own performance in the studio: 

From having absolutely no knowledge of how to notice to becoming a full-fledged noticer when creating media, the timeline in between suggests that my performance in the studio is something like this:

And it just continues growing as long as I keep making media. Starting with the first ever, unmarked assessment, I did not do too well because of my lack of knowledge and research – I could not express myself too well because I was not used to the language of seeing things that were not supposed to be seen. Usually, it would be right in front of me to analyse and easily detect but in this studio, I had to analyse and write about things I could not see. Hannah’s feedback from Task 1 was the specificity of my work – I did what was supposed to be done but when it came to elaborating the processes of what I had done, it was quite difficult to get through a whole paragraph without having to pause. However, this was easily solved because the more readings Hannah gave to us, the more knowledge I could pour out onto my work and the more that I could also express about noticing.

When it came to the second assessment task, I became more familiar with the communication of noticing and discussing the processes of my work. However, my old habits were still around to creep on my work and had the same issue of being a “little too broad and not specific enough to the aims of this studio”. I would still need to continue reading and researching a little bit more about noticing and what it is I need to do in order to be more specific and very detail-oriented.

One of my recent feedbacks from Hannah was from Task Three – this time I made sure to be elaborate and meticulous to every aspect of my work. Because of that though, I had mistakenly forgotten the point of the studio and that was to notice the unseen. I was too invested in discussing the details of my experiments that I forgot that this experiment was about noticing and did not state what I learnt from seeing the unseen. Hannah states in the feedback that I do not clearly outline what I learn about noticing through doing these activities – for example, I could have further elaborated the distinctions between human and nature and compare my analysis/experiences of it to other people’s work.

The feedback that I have received from my peers and Hannah have all contributed to how well I performed in this studio – it has been a tremendous help to my growth and knowledge of how one should notice. We all have different methods to notice and the collaboration of ideas has definitely benefitted me. The constructive criticism has also pushed me to further perfect my own work and improve on what needs to be improved. Overall, I would say that my performance in Seeing the Unseen has been smooth sailing without too many setbacks – I have come to an understanding of what noticing should be about and that there are many approaches to notice.

The success of my final project to the noticing processes that I have used: 

Looking back at my first post for Task 4, I wrote out the ‘biggest things’ into a list in order to clearly organise my thoughts:

– Being able to notice and differentiate man and nature and I would like to be able to notice not only its physical appearance but its intrinsic value as part of the environment that we surround ourselves with, whether it be the city or nature

This assignment has helped me understand the difference between humans and nature; by separating the natural and unnatural into videos, it is easily comparable to each other in terms of the length, the type of objects/sceneries I filmed, the pacing, etc. By purposefully noticing humans, nature, human structures, plants, trees, etc, this has aided me in seeing the difference between man and nature. I also took an extra step in making sure that I not only catch the physical appearance but the components of what makes it up as human and nature – its intrinsic value in society.

Artworks and inspirations have also contributed to this process – I recently went to visit Hokusai’s exhibition at the NGV and found a passage that was relatable to my current work:

This is in regards to the “Great Wave of Kanagawa”, where you can see the nature overpowering the men in the boats. My work may not be exactly equal to Hokusai’s greatest masterpiece but we both had the same thoughts on nature and man’s differences. Essentially, what I found out about nature and man is that they both have their own features of existing in their immediate environment. For example, I walk with my dog in the video but the grass continues to stay still, unmoving and untouched.

My work allows this happen by enabling me and the audience to compare the video to the next. As I said before, the physical appearance and the instrinsic value of man and nature are both important in this process of seeing what cannot be seen by the naked eye – one must see it through careful analysis emotionally, too.

– Focusing on one aspect of an environment rather than moving around

Because this was one of the comments that I received from Task 3’s panel and Hannah’s feedback, I questioned myself why I moved around. Was it necessary? What was its purpose? Realising that I ultimately had no substantial reasoning for this, I decided to make frames and shots as still as possible without any movements. Obviously you can still see some shakiness from some of shots but in comparison to my videos from Task 3, there are less movements to see from the videos in Task 4. The power of editing allows my work to be still as possible from cutting the frames I deem shaky and using effects such as Warp Stabiliser from Premiere Pro.

The ultimate question for both these dot points is: has this project allowed you to know what you wanted to know? How? What else did you learn through the process? I would definitely answer wholeheartedly with a yes because both of “biggest things” for Task 4 has been achieved for me through the processes I went through in order to create the final product. The most important thing for me was to see the differences between and man and I was able to do through inspirations from other artworks who have changed the world – my video’s same purpose as Hokusai’s Great Wave of Kanagawa is just the first step to make my audience see the world differently. Through this final assignment, I have single-handedly grasped noticing through non-fiction whilst also making media through non-traditional methods. Non-fiction, non-traditional methods and inspiration from other works have allowed me to see and make a commentary about man versus nature.

Lyreca.

Week 11 Feedback Session

Posted on by
Reply

Like the feedback session for Task 3, another session was also held for the Task 4 rough cuts and at that stage, I had already finished recording both the ‘natural’ and the unnatural’. I was second to last in showcasing my work. Here is a screenshot from a video that I showed to Hannah and my peers:

It was a fairly short review and feedback from Hannah but she asked me the question,

What did I notice through man and nature?

This question is a good prompt for me to reflect back on the videos that I’ve taken and is a good way to delve even deeper into thinking the whole societal notion of man and nature or even, man VS. nature. Answering the question, what I have generally noticed are:

  • Both the natural and unnatural have their similarities – for e.g. how they exist in the same realm
  • What I noticed is how we are almost surrounded by nature with the unnatural features only existing in nature with an exception of being indoors (which I did not film/record)
  • We ourselves, as humans, both exist in the state of natural and unnatural, depending on the circumstance or location

Other than Hannah’s question, here are some suggestions that I received:

  • Stillness of the camera – use of the tripod: My solution for this would be to record more stabilised shots and place the tripod in unusual and skewed places with stability, of course. As for the shaky footage that I would like to use, I can always use the ‘Warp Stabiliser’ effect on Premiere Pro.
  • Using more brighter colours in my shot: I can definitely take new shots with my subjects or the model wearing bright and primary colours. Through Premiere Pro, I can also change the colour through an editing software.

Other than the question and the suggestions, these are feedback that I received from Hannah. Overall, it was a very constructive and productive 30 mins of listening and seeing everyone’s process for Task 4.

Lyreca.

Results from Collecting Footage from the UNnatural

Posted on by
Reply

Much like the previous recording of the natural footage, I went to several locations in order to capture the unnatural aspects of the environment that surround us. It was pretty much the same process as collecting footage for the natural aspects and environment around us. I went to the same location for unnatural areas too, with a bit of varieties in the location. They were the following:

(A screenshot from one of my videos)

  • Melbourne CBD – Swanston St, inside the tram

(Image Source)

  • RMIT University
  • Derrimut – my cousin’s home
  • My local park
  • My own home

I underwent the same process of collecting these footages, however, with the different intention of what I was supposed to see and record. I made sure that I was actively seeing man-made and white structures, whilst also isolating these features around nature in some of my videos. I noticed that I gravitated more towards filming the unnatural, rather than unnatural – this could be my inherent characteristic as a “man”, and therefore, relating to more of the man-made objects that surround us. You can also see this from the position that I am moving in, whether it be a car or a tram, I am always surrounded by the unnatural. Also, these places are already familiar to me and did not require a prior research before I even planned to record/visit – I simply used my past experiences and even imagination in order to observe these locations. Going back to Anna Tsing’s “The Mushroom at the End of the World”, I think that it relates to the “unnatural” in a very different way in comparison to the “natural” aspects. Because I did not need to research beforehand for some of these places, the precarity and the uncontrollability took over the creative process of my work. I did not schedule or constrain myself to particular rules (except for keeping the camera steady) and let the environment and nature take its course. Despite the theme for my recording as “unnatural”, I allowed the observation to be natural and unforced – quite ironic isn’t it?

What does this tell you about noticing? What this tells me about noticing is that it is not supposed to be controlled all the time. Noticing everything is an unrealistic task to do and therefore, letting nature take over is a process of noticing. We do not necessarily have to be glued and constrained in order to notice but rather, notice what takes place in the natural and even the unnatural areas that surround us.

Lyreca.

Week 9 Preparations for Task 4

Posted on by
Reply

To begin the final project for this studio, we were given a set of questions in order to prompt us for the final task. From the final stages of Task 3, my plan was to create something along the lines of an experimental to a documentary film of the objects that encapsulated the theme of man versus nature. To further dissect the theme and how I wanted to execute it, these are the questions that show my plans step by step:

  • BIGGEST THING – What do I want to know through doing task four?

Through Task Four, I would like to have accomplished the practice of noticing. I know that I will not be able to fully be a “master” in noticing all things but through this studio and through this final project, I want my skill of noticing to be apparent in my work. Essentially, what I want to know through task four is the complexities of how we interact with the environment around us.

Some of these “biggest things” will be:
– Being able to notice and differentiate man and nature
– I would like to be able to notice not only its physical appearance but its intrinsic value as part of the environment that we surround ourselves with, whether it be the city or nature
– Focusing on one aspect of an environment rather than moving around

  • BIG THINGS – What do I need to do to know what I want to know

– Get the camera ready – use the same DSLR as the previous task (Nikon D3200)
– Take the shot of your subject into consideration. What tools will you be using with the camera? Tripods? Stacks of books?
– Possibly write down what your plans are for how long you will be shooting, the duration of the shots and the
– Research the location online before shooting

  • SMALL THINGS – How can I break these things I need to do into doable tasks?

Week 9: Start preparing and thinking about what you will need to do for the final task – reread the last blog posts about my plans for the final project. The following blog posts will be:

These text posts all contain my preparations and plans for Task Four and what I intend to do with the theory and the practical part of the final project.

Whilst reading my previous text posts counts as planning, I will also be needing to write down what I need to do for the following weeks

Week 10: Start recording – this consists of researching the location, going to the location and spending an ‘X’ amount of time shooting what needs to be shot. What do I need to shoot? I can begin by shooting:

– 1st location: The greater areas of Brunswick – preferably the natural areas such as the parks, areas with a lot of plants/trees/foliage. Try to isolate a piece of human “figure” within the shot. Whilst in Brunswick, you can also film aspects of the environment that make it part of humans such as buildings, structures, white objects, people (both a part of nature and man) – essentially anything that constitutes human nature.
– 2nd location: Melbourne CBD – look for a single piece of ‘nature’ within the built-in area and like the human “figure’, try to isolate that piece of nature. You can, of course, record buildings and human-like structures within the city to balance it out and find contrasts between the two.

Week 11: A few days before the consultation on Thursday, start working on the rough cut of the footage that you have taken so far – separate the video into two instead of compiling them together.

Also: keep up with the blog posts week by week! 

Week 12: Keep working on the video until it is up to its optimum style that I wanted to achieve – has it well and truly captured the differentiation between man and nature? What is truly its message as a video? What does this tell me about noticing overall?

Week 13: The video should be finished by then – only a few changes should be applied then. As for the blog posts, make sure they are all updated and well-refined. This includes grammar and whether my idea is clearly reflected in my writings.

This is where I start writing my final reflection and ultimately asking myself the question again – what is it I want to learn from noticing and what is noticing?

Update my submission folder on Google Drive. Double-check that all folders have the required files and that it is the correct files too.

DUE DATE – 20th October (Week 13)

Lyreca.

Text Version of My Pitch

Posted on by
Reply

(Link to my pitch)

Experiment I – Noticing through video

  • The initial question I have asked myself in the previous assignment (task two) was how I could “expand the new-found perspective that I have attained”. I think this is an important component of noticing and allows myself as a media maker to truly capture that message that I intend to share. Using this new perspective could help me shoot the ambiance of a certain location, which in this instance, is witnessing the interaction between society and nature.
  • For my first video, I decided to use my immediate surroundings as a catalyst to my prompt – it was convenient for me to be in a built-in area as I could see the interaction between man-made structures and the foliage. My goal was to notice patterns that were already out there in order to showcase it to my audience.
  • My way of observation was through glimpses of the white objects and plants. I think these two objects are a good representation of man’s interaction with nature. I believe that white is a colour that signifies us as humans and can sometimes be seen as “unnatural” in nature. Well, in my case, I would like to think that white has no contribution to what I was capturing which were trees and plants. I also chose the colour white because it is a shade that immediately stands out against nature.
  • With the second question (state the question if needed), I simply answered it by experimenting with the different settings of the camera such as the exposure, aperture and even the focal length.
  • Upon my discovery of these two different aspects of our society, I wanted to capture more of these human-like qualities whilst it was still interacting with nature, which will then be interplaying onto my next experiment. 

Experiment II – Noticing through images 

  • Moving onto the next experiment, the question that emerged from experiment #1 was how I could observe the same things in the form of an image.
  • Much like the first experiment, I had the same intentions and mindset of capturing these features of our society and displaying the communication of humans to nature and vice versa (point to the pictures/change slides)
  • However, I set myself a limitation which was only using the focal length of 35mm, to give it more of a personal feel but not too “in your face”
  • Essentially, I was aiming to capture a whole new perspective on a different medium whilst still going in with the same exact goal. 

Experiment III – Movement VS. Stillness

  • Now, for my third and final task, I merged the two mediums I have together, comparing the similarities and differences between video and photography.
  • We can immediately see the obvious contrast between the two (play the video) – and that is the stillness versus the movement from the video and the image. You can physically see that the video on top (point) is being moved by external forces whilst the photo on the bottom is completely still, as if you are expecting it to move anytime soon (but it won’t!)

Leading up to task four, my idea for the final assignment is to create an experimental and documentary short film that depicts the contrast between man and nature, mainly because of the inspiration behind this project. To me, it will be a form of expression and interpretation translated onto various types of media. As Hannah suggested during the practice panel, one of the ideas for my final project could be looking for a white object, limited to man-made structures and/or bodies in a natural area. On the other hand, I could be looking for plants, trees, foliage in a built-in area, preferably in the city.

Lyreca.

Seeing the Unseen Pitches – the Verdict and Feedback

Posted on by
Reply

After the pitch, I received feedback on my work, particularly on the pattern, colours, camera work and the contention behind the results of my experiments. The following dot points are a mix of some positive responses and also suggestions for the final project of Seeing the Unseen studio:

  • The panel found the concept of noticing patterns existing in the natural and urban environment – this includes both the differentiating and similar patterns
  • One of the positive responses from my work was that Hannah liked the last experiment – she mentioned that it was a good comparison between photos and videos, and the fact that I pointed out how one would expect a photo to move because they are placed next to a video
  • The panel also said that white is an interesting colour to use and how I mentioned its rarity in nature – the colour white could be a catalyst for my final project
  • Paul also discussed the way I moved the camera in the first experiment – he suggested that instead of constantly moving around, setting up a particular range and angle would further assist my way of noticing nature and the environment
  • Essentially, I was faced with the question about my movement of the camera – am I trying to notice the movements from the environment or finding the movement from my own perspective?
  • Some technical points about my camera work were also made – another suggestion from Paul was that instead of limiting myself to one angle and on shot, I could have the chance to pan the camera as long as you cut off the movement – from point A to point B, this could also give you another dimension of comparison and noticing. An example could be:

Rule: Make four films for each upcoming week, duplicating the cuts between the different Premiere files – the rule is that you must make a film every week in order to combine these cuts 

The dot points were all the points made during the pitch feedback and ideas contributed by the panel. I think the panel was very helpful in helping me achieve some ideas for the final task and added more onto the production of my creativity for Task Four. The panels’ feedback will definitely be credited for my final assignment! The evaluation from the panel was very productive and constructive, giving more ideas of how I should the tackle the fourth and final task of Seeing the Unseen studio.

Lyreca.

Experiment, Reflection – Experiment III and Final Project Ideas

Posted on by
Reply

Now for the third and final experiment, having mentioned it multiple times in my previous experiment, I compiled the images and videos I took over the past few weeks and compared the two from each other. For this experiment, I simmered it down to three video footage and three images, because I consider these images and videos to be the essence of my theme – the interaction between man versus nature and nature versus man. Through this experiment, what I was intending to do was examine the difference, which was mainly the movement from the video and the stillness from the image.

We can immediately see the obvious contrast between the two  – and that is the stillness versus the movement from the video and the image. You can physically see that the video on top is being moved by external forces whilst the photo on the bottom is completely still, as if you are expecting the image to move anytime soon, but obviously, it won’t, because of course, it is a still image.

The type of comparison that I will be discussing in this post are the two different mediums (photography and videography) on the same aspects that I have noticed:

White objects 

This screenshot begins at around 0:05, with the video being on top whilst the photo on the bottom half. The comparison between these two depicts that there are different types of white objects in our environment to observe, even if it is from our own identity – the video on top are my own shoes. Looking at it from a natural perspective, the similarity between my shoes and dog is obviously the colour, but it is our identity as part of “nature” that makes us similar to each other. A human being and a dog both have the ability to create movement and therefore, the contrast between the shoes’ movement and the dog’s stillness is what sets it apart from each other, hence, the title of ‘movement vs. stillness’.

Foliage 

Around 0:10, the theme of movement and stillness is still applicable to the comparison of video and photography and is even more relevant when it comes to the topic of foliage, such as the flowers in this image for example. As you the video playing on top whilst being moved by the wind and also moving with the camera’s movements, it is almost as if you’d expect the image of the flower to move but it won’t because it is, after all, a still image.

Final Project Idea 

Through these experiments, it helped me see the bigger image for my final assignment and gave me some questions/ideas –

  • How we notice the environment in everyday life
  • Being in a city space vs a natural landscape – how does this affect our noticing?
  • Creating contrast and what I hope to find out through creating this contrast
  • Is it about my perspective or what I want the audience to see? If it is for the audience, what do I want the audience to notice when they look at these contrasts between nature and a city space?
  • A final project idea could be about the contrasts in my observations, using videography as my main form of medium. An example could be: Looking for a white object in a natural landscape VS looking for a tree or any type of plant in an urban landscape
  • These experiments have paved way for the upcoming final task, giving me a clearer vision of what it is I want to achieve. Through this experiments, I have answered my own questions about our world and society, giving me a better outlook as a media maker and influencing my future works and projects.

Essentially, what do I want to find out about man vs nature in my final task? 

Lyreca

Prompt – Experiment III

Posted on by
Reply

For the third and final experiment, I decided to ask myself the question of “the similarities between the two different mediums of photography and videography”. I intend on approaching this question by combining the images and videos I’ve collected over the past few weeks. Because this is a different type of experiment in comparison to the previous two (this will not involve physically going out to capture a chosen location), I will not be writing a recipe but instead, just a simple and literal prompt to help me get started on what it is I would like to compare.

I may have already mentioned this in my previous posts but I would like to observe and illustrate the interaction between man and society. Going more into it, this means that I would have to capture each and every features of humans and the natural environment they are in. The main focus are foliage and white objects. These two attributes are a good representation of man’s interaction with nature. I believe that white is a colour that signifies us as humans and can sometimes be seen as “unnatural” in nature. Yes, white does exist in nature, but it is quite rare that it will ever appear naturally in nature. We may see a few white flowers here and there, but when do we see white leaves? Whether it would be a natural or an unnatural white, it is a shade that tends to stand in the environment. White, after all, is the representation of all the colours in the rainbow.

Now for the prompt –

To cut it short, the prompt for this final experimental task will be noticing the difference between photography and videography that have I have already explored in the previous experiments. 

This may be quite general and vague but it leaves a lot of space for creativity and imagination to take place.

Lyreca.

Experiment and Reflection – Experiment II

Posted on by
Reply

Here are the results of what I captured through photography, and editing it into a collage through Photoshop! I will now be stating and discussing the similarities and differences between these two opposing images. These differences range from the colour, shape, exposure and so many more factors of the image but most importantly, the interaction between these white “things” and nature (plants to trees).

In the first image, we immediately see the difference – the branches of the tree and the white “object”, which in this case is not an object but a living thing – a dog. It is easy to forget that living things are a part of nature but it is up to our mindset whether we want to be one with nature or not. Therefore, it is up to the viewer to decide whether the dog in this image is deemed as “nature” or deemed as a “white object”. A question during week six was addressed – “Why can’t humans and animals be considered as “collective forces of moving matter while water, sky, and wind can?”. This was the reoccurring question that made me ask myself why I chose this dog as the “subject” – we all have different perspectives of what constitutes nature but from the interpretation of the artist (myself), I believe that this image is contradictory itself as I believe that animals are closest to nature. However, it still follows the criteria of being “white” and as mentioned in previous posts, it is rare to find white in nature but it isn’t non-existent or impossible to search for. I can say with confidence that these two images are comparable when it comes to the topic of nature. The only differences are the physical characteristics which are immediately apparent to the viewer.

In this image, there is almost little to no similarities between this comparison. Among a clock and a flower, there is really nothing you can point out to what is identical. Unlike the previous photo, this is a prime example of a contrasting image – I wanted to not only include an ambiguous comparison (like the first image) but also a collage that was strikingly different even from the first look. We can clearly tell that the clock is something that is part of humans. Nature has no concept of time or numbers and therefore, this object immediately contrasts against the blooming, pink flower. The clock’s hard, rigid features sets it apart from the delicateness of the cherry blossom. It is also with the camera’s settings that differentiates these two images – the depth of field. The cherry blossom’s shallow depth of field adds more to the smoothness of the image, it is as if you can almost feel the texture of the flower because of how close you can see it. Overall, the difference is the main theme of this collage, while the similarities are almost little to none.

The final collage is in the middle of the murky waters of ‘similarities and differences’. It is unique from the other two because it is not too similar nor is it too different from one another. There is a perfect balance of difference and similarity between these two images – they both exude a soft impression whilst the other still shows some degree of sharpness such as the branches of the cherry blossoms. The colours are also both neutral, with only the pink standing out. Despite that, the most important aspect is for myself and the audience to be able to separate the two characteristics of these images, with it being a “white object” and a “foliage”.

Through this experiment, I successfully answered the question of what it is I saw when I used photography as a means of noticing. I was able to fully understand the differences between the white object versus the foliage and has especially helped me with understanding the two mediums of photography of videography.

The question that will shape my final experiment is, 

What are the similarities between video and photography in the aspects of our world that you have noticed? 

Lyreca.

Prompt – Experiment II

Posted on by
Reply

Moving onto the next experiment, I wanted to capture the same features of my immediate environment as I had done in the initial experiment. However, the only difference is that I will be using a different type of medium – photography. The question I have asked myself and plan on tackling through Experiment II is:

What will you see when you capture the same aspects in the form of photography? 

The reason why I decided to change the mode of capturing is to get a different point of view. With video, the movement of certain objects are easily detectable and are easily noticed. With photography, I believe that it can reveal more of the plant’s and more of the white object’s features and characteristics, enabling me to see the difference between videography and photography. Therefore, here is the recipe along with a solid criteria of what it is I must do for Experiment II:

Using a different medium to explore the same characteristics of the world 

The aim of this task is to explore the same aspects that had already been seen in Experiment I. You will, however, be capturing images and not video recordings.

Ingredients:

  • the same camera previously used in experiment I (Nikon D3200)
  • yourself, of course!
  • a computer for editing
  • Adobe Photoshop software

Method:

  1. Within your immediate location, capture the required characteristics of that place, as you have done in Experiment I.
  2. Remember to take full advantage of the camera’s settings and that it should always be on the ‘Manual’ mode.
  3. Once you have captured around 10-20 pictures or as long as you are satisfied with the images, make a collage through Adobe Photoshop.

Rules:

  • The camera’s focal length always has to be at 35mm for this experiment.
  • It is crucial that the camera’s settings are always on ‘Manual’.
  • Finally, it is also important that you use Adobe Photoshop to make the collage. No other apps or software must be used.

Lyreca.