WEEK 5 PROJECT PITCH

Week Five was the pitching of our final film idea for our Film Project #1. Unfortunately, Pat has fled to another group but I am still continuing to work with Joanna and Pavina because we feel comfortable with each other and have the same vision in terms of what the story of our short film will be and of course, how we want it to look.

Our ultimate and final decision with the narrative is something I consider to be romance and a slice of life. Of course, the theme/s to each and every viewer is relative to how they perceive the final piece of the film; some people may see it was melodrama, as it is one of the themes that is so ever-present in Asian film (a genre of film I am inspired by). However, nothing has been set in stone yet and everything will be determined once we actually edit the final piece.

For now, though, the direction that the group and I will be heading towards is from themes of romance to a slice of life.

The following images are a series of inspiration and what I would like our short film to look like or at least have the same sentiments and feeling:

In the Mood for Love (2000) 

Chihayafuru (2017) 

Your Name (2017) 

In terms of how we will utilize the overall look and aesthetics of the short film, we’d like to use as much natural lighting as possible, consisting of the golden hour scenes and locations where the light is muted and is not too harsh. One of the recurring scenes that we would like to practice on and experiment with are scenes that are particularly about slow motion, such as this scene from In the Mood for Love, 

As a cinematographer, the lighting is the most important component of the scene and without, a film would lack depth, drama and overall, the cinematic look that we aim to have in every short film. Through this, I aim to practice the craft of lighting and hope to achieve our intended vision for our film project.

Location

As mentioned in our presentation, we aim to go for a romance plot line of “missed moments” where two individuals always seem to be in the same location/s but never seem to notice each other until one of them does. Our location will consist of nature to built-up areas of Melbourne, highlighting the landscape and the entities (characters) that will exist in the landscape.

We thought that it would be interesting to showcase what Melbourne has to offer, which could also be perceived as an appreciation piece. Personally, I wanted to showcase the diversity and beauty of the city from little spaces to large areas.

This is still all a work in progress because nothing is ever set in stone. However, we do have the narrative and themes in lock, with just the location and actor being the last two components to be finalised.

 

The inspiration behind Portrait and Words

Despite not being in the post-production process of Portrait and Words, I was still very much involved in the brainstorming and the pre-production planning of it all.

During our group discussion, we weren’t too sure of the exact words we were supposed to showcase for the video but we knew for sure that we would incorporate different languages into the video. Given our Asian background (and as I have previously mentioned, my interest in Asian cinema), we decided to speak in the language of our various motherland – Indonesian, Laos, Filipino and English.

The inspiration for Words and Portraits was our ourselves – our ethnicities and cultural backgrounds were the catalyst for the words that we spoke during the video:

Aku Cinta Kamu 

Khoi Huk Jao

Mahal Kita

During the day of the production, we also decided that we were to speak in other Asian languages that we were familiar with such as Thai, Korean, Japanese and Chinese for the sake of making the video more interesting and longer.

Saranghaeyo

Chan Rak Kun

Aishiteru

Wo Ai Ni

I Love You 

What is so appealing about hearing different languages? This was one of the questions that I posed for myself in terms of our aims in creating this video. There are an abundance of videos like these on internet, which was one of the reasons/inspirations behind shooting a video like this.

Screenshot taken from the Youtube channel, Cut 

I thought that it would be an interesting experience to make a video that I would say is an over-saturated type (aka viral videos) that we as an audience always see on the internet. Even though it may be viral and annoying, we still gravitate towards it and watch it anyway. Therefore, it was good to know the thought process behind a viral video like this one.

I believe that once you have made a video that follows the standard format or a video that is widely accepted by the general audience, it gives you the experience to venture out into your own video-making/storytelling/film capabilities. That is one of my firm beliefs – experience is essential, no matter what the content is. It all contributes to your own independent and future works.

The inspiration behind Joy and Hurt, Week 4

Brainstorming during class – a few notes taken around Week 3 

During the pre-production process, we had initially decided that we were to play around with lights and colours as I had expressed my interest in colour schemes and colour correcting. My vision for the Joy and Hurt video was that we were going to display a yellow colour scheme during joy, expressing details of happiness, bliss, contentment – essentially, feelings that categorise under “joy”. As for hurt, it was the same process – we were to emanate colours of sadness such as blue and other elements like the shadows that are created by the studio lighting. That was the idea that my group and I had in mind. In fact, we were all inspired by this video I showed them, experimenting around with how a person’s expressions can change depending on how the lights hits their face:

The original source was actually from a music video called “Sparkles and Wine” by the artist known as Opale. I had initially heard about this from a Tumblr post and I read an interesting comment where lighting can change the way someone looks – it’s why we come across unappealing photos of our face and other photos where we look great. It all depends on the perspective and the direction of the lighting source.

That was basically the source of our inspiration for Joy and Hurt. It can be clearly seen in some aspects of the video where the root of our vision was from.

Day of the production: 

IMG_3917.TRIM-2939wyn

On the day of the production, we still followed the initial plan for Joy and Hurt, but of course, there were moments where we went on a tangent or had to compromise the production because of technical difficulties. As I have previously mentioned, it was hard to deal with the H4N and the lights (the most important component!) – this had significantly affected the quality of our video and left us no choice but to fix it in post-production.

Presentation: 

Unfortunately, I was unable to make it to the presentation but we had all agreed as a group that we were to present the rough draft, as James had told us that it was okay to present something that was a work in progress. During the presentation, we showcased the video that Pat and I had worked on together during our group meeting – it was not necessarily something that we were too proud of (it is a rough draft after all) – the audio, the sequencing of the scene and the overall quality was still in the works for more editing and improvement.

Rough Draft for Joy and Hurt 

The Final video 

Finally satisfied with the final product, there are a few major key changes between the rough draft and the final video:

  • The joy audio – I changed it to a much more upbeat soundtrack because I thought that would fit the image of joy better than the annoying, giggly laugh track. The original audio is from the website FreeMusicPublicDomain.com, with the song title of “…and your love” by the Shepherd Lemmings – it can be used under the Creative Commons License and is Royalty-free.
  • The structure of Hurt – it was initially a random sequence of close-ups for the rough cut but I had decided that it needed a structure so it was easier to watch; the first part is on normal speed but after the loud bang and the blackout, I’ve edited it to be a sequence of slow motions.
  • Green screen – the purpose of a green screen is to essentially change it a different/background colour other than green (unless, of course, green was the original aim of your video). I actually found it quite difficult to change it to the intended colour without having to alter the actual image and aesthetic of the video. I guess that after all, that is part of the process of changing the green screen to a different background. After going through the tedious procedure of digitally altering the look of the video, this result from,

BEFORE

and

AFTER

Screenshot from Joy

To sum it up, our attempt of showing joy and hurt through colours of yellow and blue was a successful attempt thanks to the inspiration of Sparkles and Wine music video – the whole details of the cinematography and editing was amazing and I aspire to be on that level a video production just like that.

Cinematography, Words, Joy, Hurt – A work in progress, Week 3

As James has instructed us to do so, we had to find like-minded individuals who wanted to pursue the same type of content – as mentioned in my previous post, I have a strong interest towards cinematography and the color-correcting aspect that comes with film, or even any aesthetically-pleasing video for that matter.

The people I found that I communicate and work well with are my fellow tablemates; Pat, whom I have previously been in most of my classes, Joanna and Pavina whom I’ve just met. For the prompts that have been presented to us (Portrait, Words, Joy and Hurt) we decided to combine two of each with one another to match and contrast the prompts with another.

This was the process of making our collaboration:

  1. Booking the film equipment and the studio: James told us to put ourselves at the deep end despite having no knowledge of how to construct a well-made scene created by directors and cinematographers. The group and I absolutely had no knowledge about which camera would produce the best results so we just decided to go with either: Sony or a Canon camera. I have to admit, I am an avid watcher of Youtube videos who do reviews of these cameras so I do have a fair bit of knowledge when it comes to knowing the difference in quality. However, we ended up booking what was recommended to us by the techies of Building 9!
  2. On the day of the actual booking, I was expecting for everything to go smoothly and for us to know the technicalities of using the camera and the whole studio. Obviously, it was the latter – a lot of issues went wrong where the boom microphone wasn’t syncing well with the camera, the lights in the studio kept turning off and making these weird mechanical sounds.
    Despite the difficulties that we dealt with, we still managed to produce some quality shots (I hope) with the green screen studio. As for the green screen, that is another story – I actually wasn’t expecting it to be green at all, but, it is what it is. We had to work with what he had after all.
  3. The post-production stages: We all had to work around our busy schedule to edit the footage together. We decided that Pavina and Joanna were to combine Portrait and Words whilst Pat and myself meshed in Joy and Hurt together. For Pat and I, it was really all just a matter of sequencing the best of the footage that we took during production. We found that hurt had more usable shots rather than joy and was easier to sequence together. The process that I found the most difficult was choosing what type of sounds/music went with joy and once again, hurt was the easier music process for Pat and myself. Here is the current work in progress for Hurt/Joy:

So far, Pat and I have finished the rough cut and hope to polish the video by Thursday night. The inspiration behind this video can be found on here!

The final draft is still in the works – expect to see that real soon!

My Film Pitch, Week 3

I’m not gonna lie, I was actually unaware that we had to pitch in our ideas for the film project. In an attempt to not embarrass myself, I quickly compiled some video inspirations that I had already seen and watched. This video compilation consists of music videos, iconic films that all fit into the emotional range of being in love.

Phum Viphurit – Lover Boy 

Having never listened to any music from Thailand, it’s amazing how I came across this. It was recommended to me by Youtube I guess because I am an avid listener of Filipino indie music and indie-stylised music videos. This video fits into my own preference for videography such as the colour and how each scene transitions from one to the next.

Troye Sivan & Ariana Grande – Dance To This 

Here is another music video but this time, however, it is produced from Hollywood, or at least from the United States. The colour scheme of this video is another beautiful example – I can’t quite explain it but the type of colours that emanate from this music video gives it a vintage and classic feel to it.

One of the iconic films of Wong Kar-Wai’s In the Mood for Love (2000) is another inspiration that I have in regards to filmmaking. The cinematography, that is, the frames, shots, angles, camera movement and the colour are all elements that I feel like Wong-Kar Wai has perfectly encapsulated into one film.

One of the recent films that I have watched known as Never Not Love You (2018) is another a film that I have the appreciation for towards the aesthetics and style.

The only criticisms I would have to say about this is that there can be tendencies for Filipino films to become almost cheesy in terms of the font choices and sometimes even the acting style. Nonetheless, it is a still a beautiful film and I highly recommend it to anyone interested in cinematography!

To summarise it all, basically my interest when it comes to creating videos is the intricacies of a shot. I am also particularly interested in the joys and the ordeals of a relationship, attempting to capture it in a romanticised but also in a melancholic way.

A Review from Youtube, Week 2

Usually, when the two word “film review” comes to mind, one would think of a Hollywood-stylised type of content – but no. In my case, I wanted to showcase a vlogger that I’ve recently just started watching. They are known as CatCreature, and I would say that she isn’t your typical Youtuber. Of course, she follows the line of what we know as ‘vlogging’ but she vlogs in a way that sets her aside from the rest.

The video I’ve chosen is called My Dearest,

To give a bit of context, CatCreature expresses her thoughts and feelings from a recent life event that she has experienced.

The angles that she employs in this video are all from a personal perspective, displaying her interactions with people in her life, landscapes. In fact, it’s more so of herself doing both stimulating and mundane activities that happen in our everyday lives.

My favorite part of the whole video is the monologue and what she had to say – even though it was coming from her perspective of her own life, there were moments where I found myself agreeing with what she had to say.

My analysis of this is that it is a simple home video, taken from an iPhone or maybe even from a point and shoot camera, however, it is a heavily edited video with filters over it to either compensate for the lack of well-prepared shots or maybe even for the aesthetics of the overall video.

She also really didn’t go out of her way to film from an incredible angle – it looked like it was filmed from the floor, her study table and was maybe even filmed by her family/friends and of course, herself.

Watching this video, it actually reminded of one of the short films we watched in class by John Mekas, who compiled several, fast, cut-away shots via FILM. It was interesting to see the comparison between the old-school version of editing with the authenticity fo film, versus the digital method of making a video with the same film aesthetics.

My first post from Screen & Sensation: Movement and Light, Week Two

My choice of film or video for this task was my own creation – Movement and Light. The reason why I chose these two videos is because I believe that it will be easier to discuss and talk about the videos I made from my own will and creative perspective. Let’s begin with

Movement

For this video, it was actually edited right after my Light video and therefore, I wanted to go on a different route in comparison to the Light video that I have previously edited (I’ll get more into that in a second). I felt that a structure was needed for MOVEMENT because I thought that through my process of this construction, it enables me to catch my thought processes and what was going through my mind whilst filming. From the opening of the train’s movement to same ending, it established how the video started out and of course, how the video ended.

Light

As for light, it was really all about a matter of experimentation for me. I wanted to play around with Premiere Pro and my editing skills. I’ve had a fair amount of experience when it came to editing and really just wanted to test out my capacity and the extent of my skills.

For example, layering videos on top of each other, placing a white background, adding effects and transitions – those were all part of my edit for LIGHT. 

I also would like to make one explanation in regards to my experimental video – prior to this assignment, James went around the class and discussed what it is that interested us in the aspect of media and creating it. I expressed that I had a certain enthusiasm when it came to Asian Cinemas. Hence why, I decided to incorporate Japanese characters into my video:

I hope to replicate and maybe even create my own version of the Asian film aesthetics, which is why I attempted to combine my knowledge of Japanese into this experimental video.

Week 12: Midnight Snack’s Last Episode

Unfortunately, we’ve come to our second and last episode of Midnight Snack. I was assigned to a much bigger role this week (two in fact!) as a Writer and Auto-Cue Operator. Having experienced the elements of liveness from the previous shows I’ve been in, I already knew what to expect and how to get ready for the show.

I was assigned to Studio C so I wasn’t familiar with the exact layout of the entire control room and set in comparison to Studio A. This is what it looked like:

The control room 

D83A8B1A-FE08-4E08-A27C-A78A8490251C-1xqbxap

The set 

In terms of Karin Van Es’ reading on liveness, her claims of liveness to be existing everywhere immediately relates back to our Midnight Snack show – I would like to focus on the connection between Studio A and C and the attachment of liveness. Even as an autocue operator, I had to pay attention and be well aware of when the switch was going to occur. It’s easy to lose focus when you may not have as many responsibilities as the other roles. However, auto cueing did relate to my role as a writer as I knew the pacing of the whole script and of course, our talent’s pacing too after a few rehearsals.

In hindsight, no matter how small a role you are assigned to in the studio, it is important to always keep up with the unpredictability of liveness. Whether you were the one who wrote the script or the is operating the autocue, other roles in the studio could definitely use an extra hand or two when we are live.

During rehearsals, everything seemed to smooth sailing for the first few minutes. Not until we actually rehearsed BEING LIVE. A lot of things that could’ve gone right if more attention was paid, went wrong. For example, scripts weren’t printed out (I’m not sure whose responsibility that is) and I ended up printing most of the script for Studio C, because why not? I am the writer after all. I just felt that I could’ve had less weight on my shoulders if someone offered to help. Also, excuse my language, but getting around the technicalities of EVS and the green was a HUGE pain in the ass. The techs themselves were already intimidating enough and only stressed me out more when my files for the green screen weren’t clear enough. Again, I felt I could’ve had less pressure if someone lent me a hand, but oh well. This is the environment of a live studio and it is something that I’m going to have to be more vocal about in the future.

Now that I’ve gotten the negatives out of the way, I’d like to focus on the positives. By the end of the show, my co-writer, Marcus had been practicing the Bean Boozled Challenged and that is one of the aspects that I tremendously enjoyed during our shooting for Midnight Snack. I also think that communication was perfect for everyone and we all got along with each other. A few laughs here and there but ultimately, a shared team effort from everyone. Acquaintances turned into friendships and connections were established.

Midnight Snack is the first of my many shows that I will be able to be a part of and I am extremely proud of everyone’s hard work! I can’t wait to get more involved in the future.

Week 11: First Day of our OFFICIAL LIVESTREAM :~)

It’s finally D-DAY, which means that we finally get to Livestream the hard work that my studio class has done over the past weeks. We had a call time of about 6.5 hours, 1:30 PM until we go live that is. Before I delve into what happened into our first day of live streaming, I’d like to about the theories behind our practice just to clear the air about the theories we aim to follow through as a studio.

Let’s begin with Sorensen’s discussion of live TV and its relevance in this day and age. To be exact, I’m discussing it in parallel with my role as a Livestream operator. Afterall, Sorensen does discuss the concept of liveness in a multiplatform context. In relation to Sorensen’s discussions amongst his reading, he focuses particularly on the concept of attracting an audience through the new technology that is social media – of course, it both “complements and complicates” the process of live television. Liveness has always been central to most television programmes, enabling producers to create more quality content and give it a feel of authenticity. As a Livestream operator, Sorensen’s theories line up in conjunction with what the Marketing/Social Media team and I have done in order to attract more audience in real life and on the live stream.

I am only secondary to the marketing team so really, I was just the medium to relay the messages from Twitter to the Livestream. For example, the Marketing team would have their laptop ready just to watch our for live tweets – the software “Livestream’ immediately catches these live tweets and it is my job to make sure that these tweets are projected during the live stream. As Sorensen states, the “uptake of Internet-enabled portable media and devices complicates and complements these developments” – I experienced both sides of complication but also the benefits that came with the involvement of social media in a live setting. In terms of the difficulties that I encountered, it was all about the timing between the segments of the show and whether it was the right time to put up the live tweets. One of the main problems was when I accidentally put a tweet over an important segment. This accidentally covered the graphics that was meant to be read by the audience but luckily I was able to remove it just in time.

I also did encounter some more problems but halfway through the show, I got more into the groove of putting the live tweets in and out at the right time. This proves Sorensen’s statement that this interaction between social media and live streaming complicates the whole process.

Despite the complications, we also encountered the good side of this advancement. It added to the overall aesthetic of the whole show including authenticity and legitimacy as a live television show. During the times I did get the timing right, I felt a sense of accomplishment running the show as a Livestream operator.

The Livestream machine

From the start of call time (which was 1 PM) until we went live, I basically familiarised myself with the overall setting of the set and even the control room. I wanted to remember which studio role my peers took over or were responsible for. When it came to setting up, I moved the cameras in the required manner and also looked out for some OH&S protocols that needed to be double-checked. I do want to address one thing that was a potential hazard that could’ve ended in total disaster. A certain group of people did not really know how to safely behave in the studio – I witnessed running, mishandling of the camera wires, a person placing their foot on the control table. It was honestly a big mess. I was in no position to tell them off because I feel like I wouldn’t have been able to handle the situation properly. However, they did take the set more seriously once we were going live which was a relief.

Despite that, we had a smooth running live television show and I am overall, impressed with the outcome of our work. The one thing that stood out to me the most was the Graphics – good job to whoever was in charge of creating that. One last complaint though – my name wasn’t in the credits. Boo.

Even though I experienced the negative side of collaborating with different groups of people, I did also go through a new learning experience. I asked people with different studio roles questions what their responsibilities were in order for me to be prepared the next time I take over that particular role. What this whole collaboration has taught me about liveness and a multi-camera production is that:

  • there needs to be a whole of pre-production and preparation involved before actually going live
  • communication is key in all areas of the studio – whether you are a producer or a camera operator
  • mistakes will happen during a live broadcast and all you can do is move on
  • in short, the SHOW MUST GO ON!

Here are some photos I took during the bumping in of the set, preparation in the control room and of course, the pizza perk!

Looking forward to our second and final episode of Midnight Snack. Woo! Bring it on!

Week 10: Actual “Rehearsal Rehearsal”.

I arrived just in time for Episode 1 to begin streaming for the first half of tech rehearsals. I was a little nervous because we were actually going to Livestream it but luckily it wasn’t going to be posted anywhere thank goodness.  The part that also made me nervous was not fully knowing how to operate the Livestream machine without the help of Ruth. So of course, I needed another crash course in order to start streaming the rehearsals.

Despite having doubts about this role, the only thing you really have to do is press the ‘Go Live’ button! Of course, I had to constantly monitor the sounds in case there was a mishap of some sort. Other than that, my only main responsibility was to use another device to watch our live stream and also potentially prepare for any crashes or errors just in case.

I didn’t get the chance to take a photo of what I saw on the Livestream screen however, I do have a photo that I’ve taken online; it’s to give you an idea of what kind of software/technicality I have to manage.

(Source) 

As complicated as it may look, everything was already configured for me so I didn’t have to do a whole lot of adjustment in general.

THE REHEARSAL FOR THE SECOND EPISODE 

My role for the second episode is in Studio C as the autocue operator and Writer. As a writer, I don’t really have an active role during a live show, however, a lot of pre-production was involved. The writers and I (along with the producers) all organised our scripts through Google Drive and this is where I frequented the most during the pre-production stages:

As I reflected on the previous blog posts, a lot of confusion was involved so it was hard for us writers to finalise the scripts. A lot of work-in-progress was involved but it was eventually resolved throughout the weeks of working on Midnight Snack. These documents on Google Drive is a testament to the stresses but also the teamwork we all felt as writers and producers. In my opinion, we just need to work on communicating more often and being clear-cut and firm with our decisions. This is an issue I’ve mentioned before but I feel like certain roles need to stay where they’re supposed to stay especially if it’s differing in studios. There was a bit of confusion from Studio A to C and some roles overtook others without giving them a chance to contribute.

This is something we all just lack because I believe that we barely know each other as a team and meeting once a week is not enough to successfully communicate with each other. Despite that, I was satisfied with the final product of Episode 1 but I feel like this should be transferred to Episode 2 (work ethic-wise, effort-wise and attention-wise). In comparison to Episode 1, I feel like Episode 2 has been neglected by the most important roles in the studio which honestly kind of bothers me because as a writer for Episode 2, our work goes unnoticed by everyone.

My role as autocue operator and writer go hand in hand so it was really easy for me to use the autocue tools (plus I’ve also used it before!). Here are some screengrabs and videos of the hilarious mishaps we had during Episode 2:

sstg-39D8CFB1-F6F0-4A0C-A2E5-A01D2D34D308-ybhl06

I hope we learn from the mistakes we made during rehearsal. I can’t wait to see how Episode 1 unfolds on our first official airing! As I write this, there’s about less than 24 hours to go before we go live! WOO, GO MIDNIGHT SNACK!