Archive of ‘Peer Review’ category

Nitpicking on ma peers

The last minute nature of this post is indicative of my passive aggressive rebellion against the changes to the weekly course requirements. I understand the benefit of reading my fellow students’ posts and referencing them, creating links between the different MediaFactory sites like a big old spiderweb, but I really enjoyed writing about other things not specifically relevant to the subject. I’d rather be required to do this, than make links to other students blog and comment on how much I enjoy their writing style and suggest kindly that maybe they could include some more funny cat GIFs?

Having said that… I really enjoyed Louis’ response to the week 6 reading. The educational possibilities of hypertext are endlessly exciting, yet we have barely scratched the surface in uncovering and harnessing the power of the technology. I love the concept of the Titanic-esque classroom, IMAX theatres in schools and technology that allows for more experiential learning. The whole thing reminds me of The Magic Schoolbus, an educational TV show we watched in primary school that also had a game we got to play on floppy disk in the computer labs. What made the program so effective and addictive was the sense of competition and reward it presented, and the narrative continuation that allowed you to start at one point and make your way through to an end point, with effective stimulation throughout the process.

I agree with Apple that its quite bizarre to think that humans prefer an open-ended and ongoing conversation as opposed to closure. I can’t imagine enjoying a book that never ends, in the same way that most people would be turned off by a War and Peace-esque 600+ pager. Yet this is what hypertext provides us with, a mimicry of conversation and ongoing internal thoughts. Where is the limit? How many things can we focus on at once before we well and truly explode?

Gihan writes succinctly about the dangers of writing with a specific audience in mind, a task which is at times inevitable. I think it is important to think about why you are writing something, is it to gratify yourself or to be gratified by others? I have a diary that I jot down random thoughts and things that happen to me each day, but the thought of anybody reading this freaks me out more than anything. And yet everything else I write, I write with the notion of being gratified by a potential audience afterwards.

I stalked you on the Internet

In class this week Elliot has asked us to stalk other class members and give feedback on their blogging habits.

I’m having a look at the work of:
Nicola
Rachel
& Marcus

I love Nicola’s minimalist layout, her upbeat and conversational tone and her knack for selecting hilarious GIFs. She writes notes on readings like she’s addressing the writer directly, emphasising with Ted Nelson and his desperate hopes for humanity and html. I also enjoyed her post Cabin Fever which left me drooling for a winter escape more than ever. I like the way she incorporates parts of her life outside of the course to give the reader an insight into who she is. I wonder if there would be anyway she could relate posts like this back to Network Media in some way? It would be really interesting to see how she uses her day to day experiences to give her deeper understanding into the course, or even just back to the world of media in general. I would love to read more about how her study relates to the rest of her world.

I like the way Rachel links all the readings to her own opinions, expressing her love for the linear and expressing her expectations for free speech within a liberal democracy. I also liked her inclusion of a Vale Robin Williams post, but I wonder if she could centre the image just to fit with the aesthetic of the blog? I also love her byline ‘Blogging the reel world’, and assume this is a link to her love of cinema. It would be really great to see this incorporated more into her writing, perhaps she could reference her posts back to particular films that they remind her of? Just a thought. I really like Rachel’s writing style and think she covers the scope of the course so far really well.

I really love how Marcus has included a very personal introduction on his homepage, covering his life so far including a childhood spent in the Philippines and the struggles of having to move to Australia mid-adolescence. I found it a little difficult to navigate to his posts, and wonder if he could create a link to a page containing each of his posts. His writing style is quite conversational, including funny images like the classic El Del Paso ‘Por que no las dos’ jpeg. I also like how honest he is about what he gets from each reading, and by talking about how he doesn’t understand certain bits he is actually able to create quite interesting and informative posts.