As a perhaps overly idealistic pre-teen, ferried back and forth from drama classes to primary school productions by my encouraging mother, my over-riding aspiration in life was to make it on the silver screen. After a few years of high school, a bizarre onset of social shyness and the crushing societal pressures to pursue a “more realistic career”, I was leaning more towards actuary than actor. I lasted barely a year in a Commerce degree before I landed on Professional Communication, a degree that seems to have sneakily lead me back to my first love. While I am not sure that my heart still lies in being on-screen, I have developed an affinity with all aspects of the Australian screen industry – in particular our television drama and comedy. I would love to work within this industry one day, whether that be through writing, directing or even acting.

Perhaps my new found love for the small screen derived from the fact that just a short while ago, while flipping channels through Australia’s free-to-air and paid TV stations, the average Australian viewer’s choices seemed fairly limited. Besides Seachange or Allsaints, it seemed the best we had on offer were Neighbours or Home and Away. And yet, in just a few short years, it would seem that we are now rather spoiled for choice. Puberty Blues, Redfern Now, Wonderland, Offspring, House Husbands and Rake barely scratch the surface of what’s been on offer on Australian screens throughout the past year.

What caused this seemingly dramatic increase in quality over a short space of time? The basic principles underlying networked literacy, as outlined by Dr Adrian Miles, advocate for a need to collaborate, to change the way knowledge and content are produced, and to look heavily at the way that content is distributed and shared within its audience. These are fundamental principles that can be applied both figuratively and literally to the world of Australian television production, and that may help to indicate the ways in which Australian writers, directors and producers are finally starting to get it right.

Imogen Banks and John Edwards are a creative duo whose names have flashed across suburban television screens for many years, often accompanying Offspring’s jazzy tunes and retro graphics, or Puberty Blues’ ‘Are you old enough?’.

The two are producers who have worked together on many programs over the last ten years, including Channel 9′s Tangle and the upcoming Party Tricks for Channel 10. The two seem to have something of a midas touch, as it would appear that nearly every program bearing their name is something of a work of gold. But what really differentiates this co-producing team and the work they create, is their ability to collaborate and pull together a team of highly talented and creative individuals. This concept of collaboration through networking fits in nicely with Miles’ description of network literacy, as media creatives must cast their nets wide to uncover the most appropriate and talented individuals to contribute to their content, in the most resourceful way possible.

But the very concept of industry collaboration, represents another type of network in which producers and other industry heavyweights must become increasingly literate within. The downside of the increase in quality and quantity of Australian TV drama, is that the pool of talent becomes spread increasingly thin throughout the various programs and productions. This shows the need for forming connections within the different areas of the industry, as all sections of production and distribution become linked within a greater web or network and eventually encompassing and promoting more and more previously uncovered talent.

Puberty Blues relates to networking not only via its manner of production, but also through its conception. As written by Lev Manovich in Database as Symbolic Form, the rise of digital literacy has resulted in the database matching the narrative as the key to cultural expression in the modern age. No longer do we tell stories or express ideas through narrative or chronological order, as perhaps it was once assumed, but instead we pluck them from our own cultural databases, giant melting pots of cultural expression that have existed since the beginning of time. Channel 10’s 2012-2014 production of Puberty Blues is a product of one such melting pot or database, as it tells a story that was originally written in a 1979 novel by Gabrielle Carey and Kathy Lette, and first made for screen in the 1981 film by Bruce Beresford. And yet none of these three products are the same, each borrowing ideas and influences from one another, and each the product of different collaborations of people – actors, producers, writers, directors, editors and so forth – each adding to the story from their own cultural melting pot of experience. The basic elements of the story are both timeless and pre-existing in millions of forms – the process of growing up and the loss of innocence – and yet when combined together appear to create something entirely new and unique.

Puberty Blues Trailer (Series 1) from Glendyn Ivin on Vimeo.

Another aspect of Adrian’s quote indicates the need for increased and improved content distribution, as noted in Chris Anderson’s piece The Long Tail. With digital advancement, comes greater opportunity for content distribution, as is given with Anderson’s example of the music industry. From Anderson, we learn that what are traditionally deemed ‘misses’ due to low sales, can still create profit when distributed widely, and that with greater and easier online content distribution, we can uncover huge niche markets who previously may have struggled for access to the content they desire. In the world of music, programs such as iTunes and Spotify have contributed greatly to this phenomenon, as we can see that without the limitations that physically buying content might have previously presented, there exists still a huge number of people who want access to and are willing to pay for this music. In television, the equivalent is online content, yet the Australian industry in particular seems quite slow to take advantage of this revelation.

In the US, Netflix is an online television platform that allows its customers access to whichever programs they desire for a monthly fee, thus taking full advantage of the concept of The Long Tail. Niche audiences are able to access their niche programs, without taking up the valuable broadcasting time reserved for more popular programs. Here everybody wins, and Netflix maximises their product, putting Australian attempts to keep up with The States to shame.

Perhaps our closest option behind Netlfix is Foxtel, a platform that has so-far failed to maximise the benefits of the digital age, after once holding serious stakes in the Australian TV market. Foxtel currently only offers its ‘on demand’ function for various programs which are nearly always blockbuster Hollywood films, meaning that viewers of any other program must obtain to the limitations of the platform – managing the capacity of their record function or organising their lives around programming time slots. These hindrances often mean that somewhat moralistic viewers, who may have been willing to pay to download their favourite niche programs, are left with little choice but to resort to piracy.

It is important that television producers and distributors become more literate with the needs of their audiences, as outlined in Miles’ quote, in order to fully maximise the profits and benefits of the ever-changing advancements of the digital world, ensuring the best outcome for both audience and producer.

Another example of the need for better understanding the needs of the audience, is the comparison between Jane Campion’s recent tele-series Top of the Lake, and the Australian feature film The Turning. As is explored in this article on The Guardian, distribution may hold the key to the success of Campion’s work when compared with the somewhat embarrassingly under-performing collaborative effort of 2013′s The Turning. The Turning seems to fit a certain niche market of people who may not feel as motivated to visit the cinema, and yet would prefer watching each story told within the film as separate episodes of television. In fact, it seems that the only way the film was able to attract a somewhat impressive box office figure was by limiting its screening period to a mere two weeks in advance. Top of the Lake, however, performed extremely well with ratings, and has had further success through DVD sales and other forms of content distribution. Many ask the question, would The Turning have worked better in a mini-series shown on television and then made readily available through online streaming and DVD production? Lynden Barber’s article on The Guardian, shows that due to the limiting parameters of the cinema-going experience as detailed in the concept behind the Long Tail, it makes more sense for Australian stories to be told through television instead, often as the product of international collaboration, in order to reach both mass markets and the arthouse viewer alike.

As industry heavyweights begin to focus on becoming increasingly network literate, we can see the overall quality and success of content produced increase over time. As detailed in Miles’ quote, the digital age calls for a new level of network literacy that relies on greater collaboration within networks, a need to trawl databases in order to create ideas and stories, and an increased understanding of the potential of digital content distribution, in order to continue the upward rise of Australia’s television industry.

Reference List:
Anderson, Chris. “The Long Tail.” Wired. N.p., Oct. 2004. Web. 23 Aug. 2013. (pdf.)

Barber, Lynden. “Better to fund high end global TV than back Austalian Films,” The Guardian, 11 October 2013, viewed 22 October 2014. http://www.theguardian.com/culture/2013/oct/11/australian-film-funding-failure-tv

Manovich, Lev. “Database as Symbolic Form”. Database Aesthetics: Art in the Age of Information Overflow. Vesna, Victoria, ed. Minneapolis: University Of Minnesota Press, 2007. Print. 39-60. (pdf.)

Miles, Adrian. “Network Literacy: The New Path to Knowledge.” Screen Education Autumn.45 (2007): 24–30. (pdf.)

It’s Week 12 and I think it’s finally time to pack the suitcase and go be a Queen of Saigon. Hanoi spring rolls, Halong bay and filling my stomach with rare beef pho. And then when I come back I can go to Victoria St and pronounce the word correctly without sounding like a wanker!!!!

Claudia’s blog is always so reliable for its up-to-dateness. She has interesting insights into the course but also into her life and writes very well.

Hallelujahhhhhhh Rachel! Her post about why its okay (or should be so okay) to take selfies for no reason at all is a breath of fresh air. I took a selfie to celebrate reading it. Maybe I’ll try and post it later.

Monique’s blog is probably my favourite out of all 7 of the blogs that have been on rotation for my weekly peer review. Her mixture of art/culture/music/writing is super kool.

Ah online etiquette…. and other top interesting ideas that were discussed in the symposium and as such quickly escaped my mind after Adrian finished speaking

The symposium this week had me struggling more than a lil’ bit.

The main idea that captured my imagination was the idea that databases are lists, rather than stories. I like the idea of applying that to the whole world as a huge database or list of artefacts, and it is only through human experience that we can piece together those lists, piece by piece, taking as many or as little as we please and create our own stories. Its the whole ‘if a tree falls in a forest’ type of mindf*ck that really gets me going. But really the world is just shapes and colours, and then cells and heartbeats and neurons come along and try to make stories out of it all, to add some level of meaning to this thing called lyf.

Just the look of the Galloway reading make brain hurt so imabee focusing on the Gitelman.

There is a section of this reading that talks about this unspoken notion that we seem to subscribe to about the future being finite and somewhat pre-determined. “Modernism” is apparently over, and we talk about the movement as if we can’t actually get any newer/more advanced than we are now. Which is a fairly ridiculous concept, especially when you begin to consider books titled ‘A History of the Future’ etc.

It’s kind of like every single time travel movie made in the 90s or earlier, that imagined us all in floating cars living in a cybercity above the clouds by 2015. For some reason in all of these future musings, the fashion du jour seems to involve a lot of metallics. The most obvious example of all of this is of course Back to the Future 11 or whatever it was, where Marty McFly found his future children in 80s style space suits in flying cars, and the asshole from the series makes heaps of money placing a huge bet on a horserace all coz Marty leaves the form guide lying around in some trash can. (This entire synopsis is based on something I last watched maybe 12 years ago so bear with me).

Space suits aside, I wonder (and obviously doubt) if there will ever be a time where everything that is to be invented is invented, and there is no longer room for originality or new ideas. Or will the world implode before then? To be honest the whole concept is starting to mess with me…

There’s some great content out in the blogosphere atm as the end of semester rolls in ever so close and an overall sense of washed out delirium starts to settle in.

Georgia is cracking me up spreading the zucchini hate, and general use of satire/ability to laugh at herself.

I’m feeling slightly threatened by the fact that Monique’s “blog” is a work of art in itself. How did she make mediafactory so cool??? Her bio is its own masterpiece in the way that it manages to achieve laidback cool without any hint of conceited-ness. (Side-note – if anyone knows what her layout is called plz feel free to slide that my way..)

I love Nicola’s monitoring of the fairly consistent Elliot worshipping/appreciation within the cohort.

It’s Week 11 and 11pm, but does anyone ever learn?

I’ve had a fun packed week full of rural workshops on gender/feminism/girly chats, a camp with kids disengaged from the education system, a Q&A session with Julz Gillard, a leadership workshop with some ‘excited’ year 9s (a kid actually responded to a statement of mine with ‘word’) and two free tickets to see ma gurl Miley Cyrus on Friday night. And tonight I posted my first ever sassy & original tweet. So things are generally going pretty well, and somehow I’m finding the stamina to pump this out when I should have already been dreaming that I was born as Mila & Ashton’s new baby girl Wyatt about 1.25 hours ago.

In other news, I’m getting back into collages again.