As a class, we discussed the meaning of studying filmmaking, focusing on whether it is even possible to study the more abstract elements of the craft. I understand the premise of the question, as it can be complicated to study subjective topics; but I feel like that subjectivity just means that different questions have to be asked. Rather than asking whether something is good or bad, instead it’s a matter of asking why the director used this shot rather than another one; or how to work with cinematic conventions – or how to break them in a constructive way.

When looking at how competency and expertise doesn’t necessarily pertain to a good film, it made me think of most of the films lampooned on Mystery Science Theatre 3000. While no one can defend any of those films in terms of technical brilliance, the passion and dedication that these “terrible” directors had created entertaining films that have sometimes stood the test of time better than anything good, but mediocre.

I agree with Robin, in that a combination of study and practice is required to get a grasp of the concept of decoupage.

Personally, it has been hard to practice, as I just haven’t had the equipment, crew, inspiration or motivation to “just get out and film”, which, compounded by COVID-19, has made me feel like I hadn’t quite got out as much out of the studio as if classes had not been impacted. I’m hoping that I can meet up with my classmates once we can work together and experiment with the practical lessons that we have learned throughout the semester.

With that being said, I feel like practicing decoupage is an ongoing thing that changes depending on style, genre, culture, cast and crew; with that being said, it is a fun, interesting element to experiment with.