One of the more interesting points that was brought up during this weeks symposium was the debate on the validity of certain materials that are found on the internet, particularly on Facebook. The analogy on the death of Robin Williams was a prime example of how we perceive the information delivered to us via the internet. When i had awoken that Tuesday morning with a chorus of “R.I.P Robin” posts covering my news feed, their still remained an element of doubt. I’m not sure if that was because i was still in shock of the news or that I still had that belief that it was another one Facebook’s pranks to send millions into disarray. I still haven’t come to terms that one of how beloved heroes has passed yet the shear fact that I initially questioned the reports due to what Facebook has delivered in the past, not only annoys myself and millions of others, but will continue to do the same when another one of our favourite icons succumbs to death.

For me personally, the validity of a story can be justified by the number who adhere to the claim and if the media institute that reports the account is a reliable source. These two key factors are to me the most important components to ensure that a news story is valid or invalid.

In addition, the symposium led to the discussion of the comparisons and differences between network and print literacy. In essence, network literacy is almost a utopia for writers as material that would’ve taken months if not years to hit the bookshelves are now available on the internet allowing anyone and everyone to access one’s ideas, opinions and arguments all with a few clicks of their mouse. Yet does that make it a more credible source? For some, print literacy is almost the pinnacle for writers; the acknowledgement and prestige to have your novel published. Thats why some view this form of literacy as more creditable than network. However, the internet provides viewers with a limitless array of literature thus making it more accessible for the general public. To me, it seems the fight between network and print literacy is a double edged sword. In one corner, you have a more valid source of material; and in the other, you have an array of work that is only seconds away from being read. Its your choice..