Pitching Pitches

Week 7’s studio allowed for class members to pitch ideas regarding their up and coming assessment task, which could be included in an online publication. A pitch’s nature should be descriptive and brief, stating the fundamental aspects of the subject in a ‘hook’ like fashion. Investigating the nature of the pitch, coincided nicely with one of my other classes about The Cinematic Image of Youth, where we recently discussed high concepts films. Similar in approach, the shortened nature of a pitch in general got me thinking about buzz words and click bait online.

A couple of classes ago we discussed how it has become quite common now to read an article’s title, digest that information and move on without actually having opened or investigated the true nature of what that article is saying. In response to this, a newspaper published an article that deplored this millennial behaviour, with the actual contents of the article celebrating the fact that the persons opened it. This story, in conjunction to this week’s pitch, are interesting things to note in the development of our society, as we’re heading towards dot-point new articles and summarised news broadcasting on The Project.

Pitch’s are great, as their lack of development invites the audience to both critique and expand your point. As we’re becoming more and more aware of the way language and semiotics develop thought patterns and meanings, perhaps the short natured rotten tomato reviews aren’t such a bad thing.

I’m You, Dickhead

Alexandra Heller-Nicholas guided us through Monday’s class today. Alex is an Australian film critic, broadcaster and writer, and her cross media knowledge was an interesting and insightful view into the Australian media industry. Starting the class by introducing herself, she successfully compartmentalised the aspects, responsibilities, and privileges of criticism that I previously hadn’t thought of. One topic that resonated strongly with me was the idea of privilege, as she stated ‘that a single mother working two jobs, wouldn’t have the luxury of watching two feature lengths films that I do each week’. This got me thinking about the true inclusion of criticism, and how in our day and age, where ‘everyone’s a critic’ that might not be such a bad thing. One thing I have been tackling with quite personally this semester is the differentiation between high and low culture, and how does one voice and opinion get credentialed over another. Alex investigated this with the class, modestly stating how she still doesn’t understand what determines her right of say over some else’s art.

Applying this questioning to my own skepticisms, specifically in relation to the investigations I have conducted PB3, I have decided that cultural criticism is my most interested format. Conducting investigations about the content’s relationship with context as oppose to the value of content itself.

Curating Criticism

This week in classes we discussed curatorship, and applied our new found understanding of it both physically and literally. In Monday’s class we investigated the role of the curator and how not only what we see, but how it is positioned, can determine our interpretation of text(s). As media changes the world, so does our interpretation of what we think constitutes curatorship. Previous to Monday’s class, I thought of curating as demonstrations of art, something pieced together by an individual with high credentials and an understanding for space. However, on reflection, curatorship is all around us, and is present in an private instagram’s construction and commercial advertisements placement.

In Wednesday’s class, we discussed sentence structure. Determining the difference between a passive and active sentence, and the importance of their difference. In the same way art curatorship communicates to the audience meanings and messages, the way in which a sentence is constructed determines how it is communicated. Identifying fundamental factors such as object, verb, and subject, we gave examples of incorrectly structured sentences in efforts to reform them correctly. This identification has now become a paramount, as I realised whilst doing this task that my whole language structure, particularly in essays, is passive. Perhaps this is consequential to millennial cultures online forum, where informal language has been misinterpreted as personal as oppose to incorrect. Either way, I am glad that this problem has been noticed (a little late in the game!) and that I can now change it.

Yossi Klein

This week in Everyone’s A Critic, acclaimed writer Yossi Klein met and spoke to the class about his experience as a professional writer. Currently the chief editor of Bread, Wine and Thou as well as having previously published fiction and poetry, listening to Yossi was extremely informative and inspiring. In a world that is continuously focused on including everyone, it at times can either feel like you’ve already been forgotten or have nothing of worth to say. Yossi however, disputed this idealism, passionately affirming that ‘everyone has a story to tell, you just have to know how to tell it’. I always find it interesting listening to professional creatives, as their application of work ethic onto something that I’ve been taught either comes naturally or doesn’t, always makes me reframe my interpretation of art and the artist’s experience. Yossi was a really interesting guest to listen too, as his ability to speak clearly and on a multitude of subjects is I have no doubt consequential to him making a living off using his voice. Raising some provoking ideas regarding Indigenous Australians and our contribution to their conversation, reaffirmed a sense of credibility within my own writing. As these days we are surrounded by the internet, and therefore a multitude of critics, it can at times feel daunting to use your own voice in case it offends some one else’s. Also, trying to manouver around the ethics of who’s right to the conversaiton is it anyway? These reasons are what stop me from focuing and publishing my writing, as my fear of criticism that I did not know even existed within my own critiques, seem inevitable these days. However, Yossi confirmed a sense of duty within myself, making me realise that everyone is allowed to contribute to the conversation, as long as you’re bettering it.

 

Wednesday’s In Class Exercise

I woke up late this morning – as usual. I had no clean clothes and the fridge was next to bare. Traffic heaved unbearably through the city scape, achieving fleeting moments of exuberant movement before collapsing once again onto itself like an insufferable dying bugAt work I went to my desk and there was a note to go and see the boss. I waited outsider her offie for a while before she called me in. I couldn’t figure out why she wanted to see me. I went inside and sat down. She handed me an envelope with manicured claws. The artificial pink tips of her fingers laughing mockingly at the exposed rawness of my own. Whilst telling me that my services were longer needed, I imagined her in her turbulent teen years, understanding that her current conviction was at fault to an education who encouraged her to talk as oppose to listen. In her conclusion, she stated that I was then ‘free’ to go, in an attempt to deceive my recent unemployment as liberation rather then defeat. I got my belongings from my desk and left. The drive home was quick. I am now unemployed.

 

I found this exercise so much fun. I love getting the chance to write. I find that in university I am not pushed outside of the boundaries of my degree enough, which although makes complete sense (considering I am studying Media and not Creative Writing), can sometimes find a bit limiting. Having a task set for you to write within the confines of, I also find makes the writing process a lot easier and more rewarding, as it allows me to become creative within the format of a traditional structure.

‘Idiot Typing’

In a film about time travel, spontaneous surprises seem inevitable, yet, I’m you, dickhead became foreseeable. Juxtaposing Blaise Pascal’s comment ‘man’s greatness lies in his power with thought’ with a Jeff Goldblum quote from Jurassic Park about ethics, the film debated ethics with modern humour, allowing the audience a portal to laught at one self through the mode of travel depicted on screen. Anthony Gooley’s character of a simplistic male, whose desire to travel back in time is guided by sex desire and reform, misses the mark and leaves the narrative with an empty space filled with the timewarp’s ‘double’ repetition. Th

 

the film provoked a modern intepretation about time travel, demonstrating

 

the film incorporated modern humour and truths in

 

quote vs. stupidity…. modern idea of self allows us to laugh at oneself BECAUSE we oppose institutions

  • In a narrative about time travel, spontaneous surprises seem the most foreseeable variable. However, this script wasn’t surprising or challenging in its execution
  • All elements surrounding the narrative are of high quality, including the actors, mis-en-scene and supporting actors, however the narrative itself is derived from originality
  • The simplicity of the protagonist attempts to create a modern interpretation of time travel, and demonstrate aspects of modern society that play out within our reality. Such as our desire and lack of romance regarding sex, and overly realistic reaction to our under hyped futures. However, by portraying such simplicity within the male narrative, the film under sells itself through its attempted simplicity.
  • ‘This isn’t about music Richard, its about tits’ – ‘jesus christ, mums a babe’ – please no
  • Humour was lost on m
  • Film elements were impressive