Short story Draft 1

WORKING TITLE: “BOGART”

(A short story condensed from a 7-page screenplay with multiple scenes)

It’s Eight o’clock on a rainy Saturday night. Mark awkwardly sits beside Kate on the living room couch in his apartment. Smart, elegant, blonde and beautiful; she’s a nine of ten. As they face the television screen in silence, Mark turns to Kate in attempt to speak, but instead, he simply smiles. He looks off to the corner of the room to see his cat clawing away at his tongue on the floor. He double takes and the cat is gone. She forcefully smiles in return and turns back towards the television screen. Suddenly, a voice breaks the silence.

“Getting any action?”.

A large vapor of cigarette smoke is blown towards Mark. He coughs and looks to his left. A mysterious man sharply dressed in suit and tie underneath a large beige colored trench coat has suddenly appeared, sitting next to him on the couch. As the man’s black fedora shades his face, the illumination of a red spark glows each time he inhales his cigarette. The man, sporting a heavy Humphrey Bogart-esque voice, seems to be a figment of Mark’s imagination, as Kate takes no notice of him.

“This was a terrible idea. You said an easy way for me to get to second base was to put on a horror film”, says Mark.

“She’s not scared?”, the man asks.

“What do you think?”

They both turn to see Kate apathetically yawning while sounds of a chainsaw emerge from the television.

“Hey, I never said I could read minds”. The man hands Mark a business card. “You can call my third cousin’s, nephew’s, sister’s, flat mate for that. She’s a pro”.

Mark tears the card in half.

“Besides, having your first date with a broad at this dump…” The man shakes his head. “For Christ sake, what were you thinking?

“You said you were going to help me out”, says Mark.

“Well, you could start by sitting up straight. Arm around shoulder”.

Mark corrects his posture and puts his arm around the man.

“Not my shoulder, idiot. Arm around hers”.

Mark slowly moves his arm around Kate. He looks at her and smiles.

“Now move in for the kill”, says the man.

Mark draws out a sharp kitchen knife from under the couch. The man quickly slaps Mark across the face, causing him to drop it.

“As in kiss her, not commit homicide”.

“What, kiss her right now?”.

“Or I could pencil you in for next week”, offers the man sarcastically while holding out a black diary. “Yes, do it now!”, he demands, as he throws it away.

Mark turns and sees Kate, having left the couch, standing near the front door. She gathers her bag and picks up her coat, preparing to escape.

“Kate, where are you going?”

“Sorry, early start at the office tomorrow”, she says without hesitation.

“Tomorrow’s Sunday”.

“Alright, to be honest this is just weird… I’ve gotta go”.

She opens the door. “Oh and tell your friend, that he’s not invisible. Anyone with a pair of eyes can see him”, she says before briskly shutting the door behind her.

Mark and the man sit in silence.

“You think she was talking about me?”.

 

Scene In Cinema: Week #3 Reflection/ Epiphany

I really enjoyed my third week of Media 5 classes. Both classes maintained my expectations and understanding of the progressive nature of these classes. Essentially, moving forward each class by working on similar scene breakdown tasks and expanding upon the basic work we were given initially in the first week. However each time we undertake these practical tasks, we are encouraged to systematically delve more into the complexities to effectively explore the processes of scene production in filmmaking.

Wednesday’s class was essentially a post-production session, as we were given 3 hours to edit our group’s video, which we shot under the constraints of our second week’s task, in order to compile our scene. After properly inspecting the clips in the edit suits, I was quite please with my groups performance on shoot as the quality of our clips were aesthetically pleasing. After a couple hours of cutting and organizing the shots in an organized linear structure, color grading, and adding sound effects, I was done with my version of the scene, and proud of it. I’m not sure if it was due to my acting specifically, but I interpreted the scene to exhibit a creepy/ darker overall mood, reflected through the reduced brightness and higher contrast color correction, with a hint of comedic relief, which is evident from the music I used to accompany the video.

Fridays class was rather similar to most classes in terms of the whole group production exercise given, which I have no complaints about, however this time Paul instructed us that each of us will direct our own individual scene without the creative input of others. For a split second I was rather surprised as each other exercise was shot as a group collaboration. However within seconds I came to my senses to recall every single experience I’ve had working on a film, television, music video or any type of video production. Each and every active crew member on set has had their own duty. Although everyone works in a collaborative manor to achieve the same result, the successful completion of the specific production, almost everyone (everyone working in their own department) works independently to fulfil their rightful position. Which is what influenced this weeks epiphany.

It felt strange for me to realize that this has been the first time I had ever extensively thought about the true collaborative nature of filmmaking, influenced by Paul’s in-class discussions regarding this topic. Although I still believe that filmmaking is the most collaborative form of art, at the same time I understand that its still an independent form of work, once we analyze the specifics of what everyone actually does. Whether it’s the director, in charge of the visuals and performance (and sometimes the technical stuff) or the camera operator and the sound recordist, who are respectively in charge of capturing the audio and visuals. People who work in separate departments hardly ever experience their jobs crossing over to another department (There has been some occasions tho such as the Director who might also be the DOP). I strongly doubt that the boom operator would consult with the cinematographer in regards to his ideas of how the camera coverage should be executed, on professional production shoots.

But at the end of the day everyone works to get the same result. So is filmmaking a true collaborative form of work? Yes and No to certain degrees. Yes; as all crew members work together to efficiently complete a film. Yet simultaneously no; as everyone in their own department has their own duties and responsibilities to accomplish the completion of the film.

 

Scene In Cinema: Week #2 Reflection/ Epiphany

I was told to read more books this week to further my studies for the Short story writing course. I’m rather apathetic when it comes to reading anything over 201 pages (go figure). However, this week after the constant focus on scenes in films rather than its entirety, I’ve come to realization that my inspirations for all my work, wheather I’m writing or “making” a short film (actively participating in at least one area of all stages of filmmaking from Pre, on and post-production, maintaining creative control), I’m only inspired by visuals. Anything I can see. Mostly films, television, paintings, absurd situations I observe or somehow find myself to be involved in life. Things like that. I’ve come to this realization after watching a few of my favorite films before beginning to write my analysis on camera coverage for the Found scene exercise. Even a Salvador Dali painting, which will always rapidly imbed itself in my mind whenever I see one, will instantly make more sense to me, rather than anything Hemingway or some other alcoholic ever wrote. I only believe what I see.

Unknown

 

 

Class Reflection:

I thoroughly enjoyed our second Friday class for Media 5. After getting into groups again to conduct our practical exercise, I began to see the progressive structure of the course. As each time we are assigned to complete these similar scene blocking exercises, we have been asked to do something additional. From our first Wednesday Class, being given a script and told to only capture the scene without recording it on our camera, we progressed our second Wednesday class, to do the same exercise under the same conditions, only this time to hit the record button, to capture our rehearsed scene in strict order without editing, thus practicing the in-camera editing technique. On this occasion however, were asked to do the same thing, except to actually have a post-production stage to edit the shots we had filmed. Effectively before we left the classroom to begin filming, my group members and I all marked up the scene synopsis we were given and deliberated how we all envisioned the camera coverage should be set up. While “on-production”, our group was effectively able to rotate all production roles around. And when I say all, I mean ALL roles. Including acting, which I have no idea how it will look, once we have all individually edited our versions of the shots into one scene. Additionally, I really enjoyed having the chance to be placed in a group with people who I had never worked with, as I believe we collaborated well in executing this assigned task. I look forward to see how all the shots look once I begin editing the clips together.

Scene in Cinema: Found Scene

SCENE LINK: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=03QHVB_n6N8

Slapstick, facade, animals, animated foreign non-American characters and chaos. These are some of the signature ingredients found in the recipe for Blake Edward’s cult classic film “The Party” (1968), starring his longtime collaborator and British comic legend, Peter Sellers. A true auteur, Blake Edwards who’s credited as the writer, director and producer of the film, presents us with his homage to classic slapstick traditions from the silent era of cinema.

Early into the film, Edwards introduces the films protagonist; Hurundi V. Bakshi (Sellers), an accident-prone Indian actor, who constantly manages to cause problems despite his good intentions. As he inadvertently manages to detonate explosives on set of a film production, seconds before it’s scheduled for detonation, Bakshi is not only fired but also chased off set by the director. Instead of being blacklisted from Hollywood, he is put down on the guest list, receiving an invitation to a lavish Hollywood party by mistake. Throughout the remainder of the film, Bakshi systematically creates mayhem resulting in the destruction of a house, loss of ones sanity and a clean elephant, by the conclusion of the party and the film in its entirety.

During the scene where Peter Sellers’ character walks around aimlessly in the mansion observing the party guests, he maintains the social awkwardness of Bakshi. This is expressed not only through the performances and positioning of all the actors, but additionally the specific way the camera is used to capture the scene

.Screen Shot 2015-03-12 at 10.01.36 PM

The moment where Bakshi leaves the couch and walks over to some of the party guests, a medium long shot is used to show Bakshi’s positioning; in contrast to the others. While the trio, standing above him on the stairs, are drinking smoking and laughing; Bakshi, alone, is standing ground level and below the group. From the following close-ups, not only is Bakshi’s shots separated between the frames with only himself in shot, he is looked down upon the partygoers on the stairs who are all in the same frame. This makes him seem rather socially inferior and distant to everyone else.

Screen Shot 2015-03-12 at 10.02.39 PMScreen Shot 2015-03-12 at 10.01.53 PM

When Bakshi progresses to disrupt the congressman’s anecdote, the long and lingering camera coverage is used to maintain a slow temporal pace. In addition to the contrasting shots between Bakshi and everyone else, the lingering shots creates the cringe humor to settle in, as a result of the lack of time passing from the moment Bakshi opens his mouth, verbally exemplifying his lack of comprehension due to the cultural barrier he faces. Thus effectively portraying Seller’s character as the ultimate awkward “foreigner”.

Screen Shot 2015-03-12 at 10.04.12 PMScreen Shot 2015-03-12 at 10.05.20 PM

Scene In Cinema: Week #1 Reflection/ Epiphany

To summarize my initial reaction to Media 5, it matched approximately 60% of my expectations for what I thought this class would potentially encompass. Despite this, I was pleasantly surprised that we got the opportunity, in our first class for the year, to grab a camera and block out our assigned scene, in collaboration with our group members. Having the experience in freelance and ch31 production groups as well as a technical qualification in Film and television production, I was within my comfort zone, and greatly appreciated the nature of the exercise. As I was expecting more theoretical work (which I assume will inevitably consume the majority of this course) I was really contented to do this kind of practical work. It really challenged us to use our minds to deliberate and achieve an interestingly effective shot to comply with our restrictions of maintaining a single shot for the entire dialogue between two characters in a scene. After the completion of rotating roles between group members during the blocking our scripted scene, It was great to demonstrate our best take of our rehearsals with the camera in front of class and see other peoples interpretation of the camera coverage from the scenes they were given to work on. According to observation and my beliefs, filmmaking is the most collaborative art form, therefore I hope to look forward to more practical in-class group work, such as our first Media 5 exercise for 2015.

MEDIA INDUSTRIES: Online Seminar Critique

Boasting a day with great content, theme, catering and a line up of guests, the ‘On the line’ group presented us with the final seminar from the 2014 Wanted seminar series.

The most district aspect of the seminar was the appropriate theme and staging of the event. I really liked the digital/ matrix visual style of the event, which I anticipated to be present after watching the group’s video trailer for the seminar, earlier in the week, which really introduced their theme. Upon walking through the seminar room doors, I was pleasantly surprised to see the whole visual environment of the room. I really liked the use of the multicolored green and white lighting to accompany the overall low-key lighting, their choice of ambient music, visual graphics projected onto the screen as well as all the room decorations, particularly the binary coded banners at the front of the stage, to support the atmosphere of the room. However I wouldn’t mind seeing more physical props positioned on stage to fill some space and enhance the mise en scene.

It was evident that the group was well prepared (as they were the last presentation group) and technically competent. In addition to the intimate lighting arrangements, the sound quality of the audio set-up was consistently loud and clear.  I additionally enjoyed seeing the detailed graphic and text screen visual animated slides that were shown via the projector, to support each time a guest introduced themselves.

I consider the group promoted their event rather effectively. In addition to the group’s decently produced video posted on the Wanted series’ Facebook page, I saw many posters not only in building 9 but around several populated areas and notice boards around RMIT’s city campus

Although there was an individual missing, the remainder of the guest line up featuring Beatrix Coles (Screenherd), Anna Horan (The Vine) and Steinar Ellingsen (Melbourne Webfest), were appropriately chosen by the group to talk to us students. I believe the two hosts were great with interacting and constantly ‘interrogating’ the guest online content producers to get all the required responses to their questions.  Because of this, the content and discussions throughout the seminar, greatly covered the broad subject of transmedia and the effectiveness of the current online landscape of media rather well.  However I especially liked the discussion of internships, and the advice the guests were able to share, based on their experiences while working as interns. “As soon as you feel like you’re being exploited, get the hell out“ exclaimed Beatrix, which was one of her many words of advice.

Therefore the final seminar series wrapped up in spectacular fashion as the event was well executed and rather enjoyable.

Score:HD

MEDIA INDUSTRIES: Global media seminar critique

The Global media takeovers’ group seminar was so far my favorite event from the Wanted seminar series. Well, my favorite other than our seminar…

First of all, the staging looked great. The room lighting was set up very well and I particularly liked the color lighting scheme of the red, blue and orange hue of lights shining on the back wall well above the guest’s heads, which really complemented the ambience of the room. The mise-en-scene was appropriately designed, with the set consisting of lighting and plant decorations behinds the seats.

The sound was fantastic, with a great consistency in the level of volume emerging from the speakers. I take my hat off to whoever set up the sound, as throughout this years seminar series, it seems as though audio was a technically hard aspect to master, but this group really pulled it off.  It was exactly how a seminar should look feel and sound.

The seminar was structured fantastically, featuring guests; producer Susie Jones from Matchbox Pictures, Elloise Mae Foster from Small World Social, journalist James Fettes from the ABC and producer Jane Liscombe from EXIT Films (all who have appropriately worked overseas). The content was great, as I enjoyed listening to the guests’ in-depth discussions of their experiences: their struggles and success while working abroad overseas in countries such as the UK and the US. Additionally the hosts did a great job in interacting with the guests to attain appropriate responses and to encourage/ regulate equal amount of discussion time between everyone on stage.

The only minor negative aspect of the seminar was in regards to the advertising, which could have been implemented a little more around RMIT as I didn’t see many posters, and the theme. Initially from my understanding the group went for a rather heist/ crime themed approach, similarly consistent throughout the Crime Wanted series theme. This was particularly evident from their video trailer, which I enjoyed watching earlier in the week. However on the day of the event, the group had switched to an airline/ flying abroad theme, with the group members wearing attire suitable for airline stewards and displaying imagery via the projector and having printed material related to international and airline themes (which I admit was more appropriate due to the seminars international media topic). Couldn’t they have merged the consistently ongoing theme and the airline theme to create some kind of snakes on a plane themed event? Now that would have been interesting!

Score: HD

MEDIA INDUSTRIES: Film seminar Critique

Immediately with the briefest of introductions, the Reel crimes group initiated their seminar. I must commend the group on their selection of Guests consisting of film director/ producer Nadia Tass, producer Trevor Blainey (who reminded me of Alfred Hitchcock) and Veronica Gleeson from Screen Australia.

I must say, the group lacked technical excellence, specifically in regards to the sound and lighting setup. The audio quality was rather poor due to the fact that during the first half of the seminar there was a constant static tone that could be heard in the background from the speakers. Additionally the mics were not working properly for the guests, as they had to constantly switch handheld microphones between each other, yet still occasionally I could not hear what they were saying from the sound levels dropping off. (Oh and how can I forget the loud near deafening tone that blasted through the speakers during the break

The staging was rather bare as it lacked a proper set design. I would have liked to see more on stage than simply three chairs and a table, as the staging resembled somewhat of an intimate press conference instead of a interview seminar. However that being said, its still looked decently professional.

With the lighting, to say the least, it was a rather awkward set up. Why was there a dedo light positioned inches behind the guests facing the audience? Every time I would look to the far left of the stage towards Nadia’s direction, I had to shield my eyes from the unpleasant beam of light from the dedo.

The group also lacked effective advertising, due to the fact that I hadn’t seen many posted around he RMIT campus, and their video trailer lacked originality as it simply consisted of a video montage featuring footage from various blockbuster films.

Despite all this, the content was great as the guests covered the topic/theme of film production funding extremely well. I particularly enjoyed Nadia’s inspirational words encouraging us students to go out and create content and be productive, as we shouldn’t have the mentality that professionals in the industry owe us anything simply because we’ve graduated from RMIT. I really appreciated these words from a realist. However I believe the host of the seminar could have interacted with the guests more during discussions to direct them a little more to assist the progressiveness of the discussions to be a little more diverse, covering more components of the film industry.

Overall, a descent effort from the film group.

Score: CR

MEDIA INDUSTRIES- Final Event participation summary + Overall Self-Assessment

Week 6 Event day:

Upon arriving to Rmit on Friday , the big day of our event, I helped move the (extremely heavy) set from the studio in building 12 to our seminar room in building 7. After we managed to move everything, I got a few members of my group to help me obtain all the tech equipment I booked, such as the camera, lighting, tripod and stands, from the AV loans in building 8. At around 10:30AM when the seminar room doors opened, everyone from our TV group immediately burst in and began preparing during what was ultimately the calm before the storm.

As the camera department was the area that I was most focused on, I began immediately, upon stepping foot in the seminar room, to set up the camera equipment. While I was setting up the front close up camera, I got help from Aria to set up the lighting for the guests and the room’s ambience for the audience. Despite our group lacked a proper designated lighting person, I was still able to give some basic direction for the lighting atmosphere I was intending to create. However I believe I should have directed my attention a little more to the lighting, as the final result wasn’t exactly lit the way I had indented it to be. Unfortunately, there were so many things to do within such a small timeframe. Additionally I helped Kelly arrange the second wide shot camera that I positioned in the center of the room within the seating aisles, to complete our dual camera set up. Before I knew it, the time was 11:30. The auditorium was full and the guests where seated. The intro video began to play on the projector, and so our seminar began. From the moment I hit the play buttons on our cameras at the beginning of the seminar to when I pressed stop after our host announced the break, I was able to effectively capture the entire action of the seminar, without any problems. During the break I was able to playback the videos for both cameras, to watch the content that we were able to capture. It looked great. Connor our host was funny, the guests were getting into the spirit of the event and gave some great answers to our questions, and the audience seemed to be genuinely interested in the seminar discussions.

All of a sudden, the second half of the event began. Without getting a chance to relax or have anything to eat, I quickly ran to the front of the room to begin recording the second half. Mid way through the Q& A of the event my camera stopped recording due to the memory being full. Frantically I reached into my bag and grabbed my spare SD card that I had fortunately packed with me, and began to resume recording. Shortly after I looked back beyond the seating aisles to see how things where going for Kelly with the second camera. Much to my dismay, she expressed a look of concern. I signaled Troy who wasn’t sitting too far away from me to take over camera in the last 10 minutes of the seminar, so I could go to see what Kelly was having trouble with. It seemed as though the other camera was also out of memory, however luckily we had an extra camera, which we used to record the remaining duration of the seminar. When the host wrapped up the Q& A and thanked our guests at the end of our event, I was relieved to wrap up filming. Essentially, I believe things went fairly well and I collaborated well with my team members to organize and set up the technical elements of the event. Apart from a few technical issues, which we were able to efficiently recover from, It was a really productive day. Straight after packing up and leaving the seminar hall, I inspected the footage and was delighted to see the high visual quality of the clips.

 

Mid Semester Break week Post- Production:

During our mid semester break; I began editing our video for the 5-minute highlight reel of the event. After proper inspection of the video and audio content that we recorded from the day of the event, I was rather pleased with our results. Although the quality of Simon’s sound recording was a little questionable, I still think he did a decent job to capture the discussion and voice of the host and guests, which ultimately is all that counts. Additionally I was very happy with the visual aesthetic qualities of our clips that we managed to capture with the cameras. After working a few hours a day for five days during the uni break, I managed to complete editing the video. The part that I found most difficult was the process to limit the video to five minutes, as there was so much interesting content I had to exclude from the final cut. However I honestly believe I managed to include all the most vital aspects of the event for the final edited version of the seminar video that is informative and visually stimulating.

 

General Self-assessment:

Overall I strongly believe I was able to contribute effectively towards my group, specifically in organizing the props and technical equipment during the pre-production stages, by providing my camera operating skills during the staging of the event and efficiently editing the seminar video during post-production. From the seminar itself, I was able to properly understand the importance of practical skills and knowledge when applying for industry jobs (as described by the guests). Subsequently after the staging processes from the event, I understood that I’m more suited to peruse a career in television narrative production rather than live studio television, due to the high pressured fast-paced work environment associated with live television production, where there isn’t much time to deliberate whenever a problematic situation arises. Nevertheless I really enjoyed this experience from my involvement in the “Breaking in” television seminar. I honestly believe that I worked effectively, to contribute to my group as an individual by demonstrating my skills and knowledge (technical skills and knowledge relevant to our seminar) and to collaborate with my group members as a team during discussions, while attending all Media Industries classes and meetings.

 

Personal Score: 80/100- HD

MEDIA INDUSTRIES: Non-Fiction seminar Critique

A rather good way to start off the 2014 RMIT ‘wanted’ seminar series. I think the Non-fiction group did a descent job organising the whole event, which was quite entertaining and well prepared for the short amount of time they had.

I really liked the simplistic design of the promotional poster as It was original and appropriate with the whole Wanted/ crime theme of the seminar series. The event itself was also promoted well, as I was able to see the poster around various buildings at RMIT, such as building 9, 8 and 5.

Initially I thought to myself that since the seminars theme was based on documentary filmmaking, that I would zone out after the first 10 minutes and remain unengaged until the end of the event (unless if I decided to leave early). But I was able to maintain my focus on the action at the front of the stage due to the stimulating discussions given by guests; Terry Cantwell, Maya Gnyp, Genevieve Bailey and John Hughes (No relation to classic 80’s/ 90’s Hollywood director or the same name). What I particularly found interesting regarding what the guests talked about was the processes they underwent during the production of their films, particularly Genevieve Bailey’s experiences to how she was able to approach and interview eleven year old boys and girls around the world for her feature documentary, I am Eleven. There was a strong structure to majority of the seminar, however their Q&A via twitter was rather pointless, as there were already many people present in the audience (#pointlesstousethe#). I also enjoyed watching the short video intro montage the group played before each guest initially spoke to the audience, which showcased some of their work to introduce each speaker.

However the event lacked proper staging and visual flair, as the stage was rather bare, with no props to enhance the general ambience of the room. Also the sound could have been a little louder in order to clearly hear the guests at all times.

I didn’t like the way the seminar was hosted. I believe the presenter/ host could have been more interactive with the guests, by asking more questions to encourage more accurate and concise answers, as there were many occasions I felt as though the guests needed to be properly prompted, when put under the “spotlight” to talk.

Overall I think the non-fiction group did a good job to kick-start the seminar series, with a descent structure to ensure a great pace for the event from the beginning to the end.

Score: CR