Tag: power

Strength, Weakness, Opportunity, Threat

Caged heart

In a group work, it is important to acknowledge every member’s strength, weakness, opportunity, threat. I believe from a personal analysis, these are mine:

STRENGTH

  • If you have a better Idea than mine, I will 100% support it and give new ideas that I think will be useful
  • I will do what my task is and complete it under the given time
  • If no one dares to try something, I usually will be the one to step up my shoes
  • I am quite optimistic
  • I can handle critics for my project, and I’ll try to improve by their tips

 

Weakness

  • I tend to procrastinate, it also means that I’m at my best only when I’m under pressure
  • to people that I feel are much more smarter than me, I tend to be quiet and very reserved because everything I said would sound stupid in front of them
  • I care too much about other people’s opinion, so I tend to agree to go with their plan, even though their idea isn’t that good itself (luckily this isn’t the case for my project brief 4 group!)
  • I work really badly in a pessimistic group

 

Opportunity

  • I will try to speak up more and give my opinions.
  • I will try to be more friendly (my friend believes I have one of those “RBF” faces, which makes me look really uptight)

Threat

  • I think my biggest threat is my self-confidence

Technology Determinism

Distracted youth

Technology Determinism refers to the state where media technology has shaped how society thinks, feels, acts and operates as we live throughout the development of technology.

According to uky.edu, technological determinism is a belief that we do what we do because of the messages and stimulation we receive from different forms of media.

Technological determinism usually referst to the present, projected on to the future, as expressed in claims that ‘we have no choice but to adopt this technology’ – A. Murphie and J. Potts 2002

Marshall McLuhan explains that all technologies are extensions of human capacities. Tools are extensions of manual skills and computer is an extension fo our brain. For Marshall, culture media is significant not because of it’s content, but how it manages to shape people’s perception.

If so, Has television and cinema become our third/second parent? Or even the first? Because probably most modern family will have their child in front of television when they are 2 years old. Do you agree with the theory of technological determinism?

Culture and Technology

Technology

The readings gave me a lot of contemplation. Here are some of the points that surprised me the most

Technology was used sparingly in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, refering [to] the study of the arts…But by 1860 its meanings began [to] shift to its modern usage; the word had come to mean the system of mechanical and industrial arts

According to Wikipedia, the term ‘technology’ was used to describe useful art, forms of  art that is manufactured and crafted, and basically the antonym of performing/fine art.

The article also cited  from another author: William Barret

“…if our civilization were to lose its techniques, all our machines and apparatus would become one vast pile of junk”

This basically applies to all of our media work right now. No matter how expensive and advance our equipment is, without the right skill and technique the content will basically be a pile of junk

It seems that ‘technique’ is not just a specific of skills towards a certain kind of machinery, but also towards the body. Marcel Mauss believes that techniques “crucial to culture and to the transmission of culture as technologies”. The way we walk, we swim is a result of techniques pass down from our ancestors. It’s effective and traditional.

As the time goes, culture is associated with the artistic or the mind. The romantics embraced culture while the industrial opposed it, labeling the two word as if in black and white, completely contrast to each other.

Culture is dynamic because,…ideas and values change, often quite quickly, over time. Older attitudes to culture may be susperseded, or they may overlap with new ideas, or the older values may re-emerge at a later time.

like culture, technology is also messy. Technology such as the internet has allowed everyone who have accessed to it to put whatever content they want, whether it might challenge other people or not.

While corporations attempted to wring new profits out of this huge entity, governments sought to impose regulations on what they saw as an ungoverned system. The latter attempt, at least was made difficult by the properties of the internet as a global network. As one of instance of the globalization process, the internet does not respect national boundaries or jurisdictions

Just to show that the internet has become a powerful entity, capable of passing the fences each country has built.

Because the reading is way too long, I couldn’t give out all the points, because it would be stagnant and boring.  Do you have any points you want to point out?

Media and Fear

 

Have you wondered what those posters of portraits with Aussie word written on them are?

I first realized that there were a number of similar posters that begun appearing in different wall across the Melbourne CBD, from the lane near my apartment, to the plaster walls in front of building 10. At first, I thought this was some kind of “graffiti” that has no meaning whatsoever. But I kept seeing the damn (I don’t know why, I got annoyed seeing these posters to be very distinguishable) posters everywhere, and I finally googled it. I was directed into Pozible, a project fundraising started by Peter Drew, much like Kickstarter/Indiegogo, and found it to be very profounding and ‘cool’.

The project asks us what it means to be the real Australians. It tells about Monga Khan, who bypassed the White Australian Policy by being a cameleer, proving essential to the Australian economy back in 1850’s.  The White Australian Policy was a conduct created to limit the number of migrations, mainly because of the gold rush, and to only allow immigrants from Britain or Europe to come in Australia. The Policy was abolished in 1966, and soon the 1975 Racial Discrimination arose. The legal side has been put to justice, but has the spirit of the nation justified?

“What is a real AUSSIE?” is not the first project by Peter Drew. Before this, “Real Australians Say Welcome” posters were stuck up all across Australia. The arrow Peter is trying to direct us here is that good citizens of Australia must accept every refugee in need. I solemnly agree on this matter, and if you ask why, it’s because almost all of us are immigrants ourselves. Excluding Aboriginals, All first generation Australians came from overseas. According to Australian Bureau of Statistics, in 2011 over a quarter of Australians are born overseas, and one fifth of Australians have parents that are born overseas. Australia is basically a nation filled with refugees, and closing our gates to the little boats is cruel and hauntingly ironic.

There are plenty counter-arguments to rebut my statement earlier, but I will not be discussing into that context. Rather, I want to discuss the borderline of racism, and fear perpetuated by the media, the all glory source of information and entertainment, given light by my recent reading by contextual studies. that I am currently taking. The media, let it be the internet, radio, television, posters, has created a specific image, specific value towards some people with a specific race and religious beliefs. An article by the Brisbane Sunday mail 28 March 2010 (source: Refugee Council), showed a picture of a woman wearing a hijab with her child in a supermarket, depicted by the newsletter as “suspected immigration detainees”. The word ‘suspected’ heavily implied a negative connotation towards the matter. Fear that the number of illegal boats were rising were abused by politicians to stir Australians left and right. You can see how easy people are swayed by the media, by looking at the 1938 War of the World radio drama, broadcasted over one hour and managing to create a mass panic, despite the fact that usually they had only a few listeners. Imagined what would you have done at the time of the broadcast. You would be calling your friends, telling them to switch channels because you are listening to the humankind’s extinction. Fear is a powerful tool, powerful enough to group ethnicities, to group beliefs, and to group our societies.

This post won’t be an essay. I’m just noticing the topic that I am currently discussing is somehow connected to the media i’ve been watching.  Do you guys have an opinion on this matter? Do you agree? that Media is a powerful tool, but sometimes used to toy with our perception?

Skip to toolbar