This week’s studio consisted of yet another brainstorm as a class, however this time discussing about what it means to be a critique and the elements we should be constantly considering.
Last week’s focus was on writing our own reviews whereas this week we shifted on to critiquing others work.
The 6 main points to consider when critiquing others work are:
- critique the writing, not the writer
- offer critique that is thoughtful, not rushed
- start with the strengths
- address weaknesses with positive language
- be open to other areas and genres (be objective)
- be specific: give examples to avoid being vague and make solid suggestions for improvement
I find it fun critiquing other people’s work in terms of recognising their style, structure and language, but it’s hard to actually critique it in regard to what improvements can be made. The main reason is the style and overall tone of the piece – each style is so different; a casual and conversational style versus a more authoritarian and direct piece. Both so different so can we criticise or make suggestions for alterations based on this? I guess it has to do with if it fits the piece and whatever works with the content.
The tone of my Baby Driver review is quite casual in terms of the way my writing is delivered. I’m in no ways forceful with my opinions and arguments, rather quite fair (well I aimed to be anyway…) and made sure to back the criticisms with positives.