Tag Archives: plot

NARRATIVE SEMINAR

Let’s be honest, everyone’s seen a pretty shit film. I watched Grown-Ups 2 once and it probably goes down as the worst I have seen. I have some respect for Adam Sandler, his SNL days are some quality half-baked viewing. But Grown-Ups 2 defied all logic of filmmaking and still made $247 million in Box Office revenue. I’m not here to rag on about Grown-Ups though; it’s just an example of a shocking narrative, or lack thereof.

Dan’s summary of Narrative was pretty much what I’ve been taught before, and almost completely contradicts Grown-Ups… All the key elements of Narrative were there; character development, plot and resolution. But I haven’t ever visualised a story as a graph with peaks and troughs relating to emotion. I found this mapping of emotions an effective way to summarise key events relating to the protagonist.

It was when we were watching “We Have Decided Not to Die” though, that this mapping process became difficult. As it is, WHDNTD is a possible example of a film with no narrative. This is very arguable though. The soundtrack of this film reminds me of a lot of house music, where an emotional atmosphere is constructed to provide a form of narrative. Just like in WHDNTD, the similar elements of the soundtrack tie each evident section together to form parts of a bigger picture. On this basis, I felt it possible to construct a visual map of the plot points.

Twisting Narrative and recreating old stories captured my attention. The unexpected nature of ‘Red Hot Riding Hood’ was great because our understanding of the story was challenged. This is what I enjoy about film and Narrative; being taken by surprise, and I took this as the main point of the seminar.

– ‘We Have Decided Not to Die’ and ‘Hot Red Riding Hood’ can be viewed below.

Source


Tex Avery – MGM 1943-05-08 – Red Hot Riding Hood by barayluis

 

– Gabe

TRIVIA IDEAS

It’s been a while since I’ve attended a trivia night. The last time I turned up was in September last year and I had just shaved my head for the first time. It was a gooood Grand Final weekend.

But things have changed since last time. My good friend Daniel has taken over from Michael “Chuck” Norris as Trivia Master and besides a couple of minor hiccups, he did a damn good job! Finding out that Danny was $150 the wiser for his services got us all thinking though. $50 an hour plus beers and a meal is a recipe for a terrific story.

My friend Caius introduced me to the idea that Danny would play the part of the perfect Corrupt Trivia Master. Friendly enough to be in with the pub owners, but responsible enough to give his mates the answers. And the reward, a $40 bar tab. Between 15 people.

As silly as an idea it is, there seems to be a bit of stuff that I can work with. Regarding plot points and character development, the story basically writes itself. I suppose now the next step would be to take the idea and twist it so that the narrative isn’t too predictable. If anything eventuates, I will keep you posted…

– Gabriel