Producer & participant

“Recording yourself recording yourself recording yourself” – producer 

I wander through my memories of Federation Square as well as the place itself, reflecting on minor teenage rebellion, poorly maintained bathrooms, the people I see and, more than anything else, the strange drive we all have to record these poignant, pointless moments.

 Screen Shot 2015-08-17 at 4.16.46 am

I was interested in exploring Federation Square as a collection of memories and experiences rather than a place in itself, so I decided to focus on my own history with it for my producer piece. I have a lot of memories associated with it and decided to explore those as well as including location narration to expand on the idea of Fed Square as a shared space.

After Just different, I knew I needed more variation and textures. Wandering around Fed Square with a microphone didn’t exactly yield the content I expected and was frequently derailed as I followed my train of thought. I had to rethink my piece around the material I had since I wanted the location narration to have that improvised element in contrast with the studio recording. I’m happy with the segments I isolated as I think they help round out the sense of a populated space without taking the focus off the producer.

I knew I would feature my voice almost exclusively, which is why I felt it was very important to include a section of pure ambient sound to set the scene. I decided to have so close to the beginning of my piece to create a sense of the space the listener could picture for themselves, creating a sort of stage for my anecdotes. I wanted to fix the piece firmly in its location to avoid it turning into a series of reminiscences and random observations. I’m happy in theory with the idea, but I’m not sure about my execution (like so much of my work in this course so far).

I’m satisfied with how I’m progressing in Media 2 but I know I still have a long way to go before I’m at a level I’m satisfied with. I want to focus on the complexity of my work and experiment with different textures and elements, but at the moment I’m struggling with finding a way to make them work cohesively. I think, like most of the media skills I’ve been exposed to so far, it’s a matter of exposure and practice.

I loved the way Dear Birth Mother and Tupperware intertwined different vocal textures and I took a lot of inspiration from these pieces; especially DBM, and the way it used the letter as a backbone for the feature. I wanted to have a similar sense of structure, which I don’t think I managed to achieve; it was too tempting to segment my piece into rough themes. I think losing that semi-formal structure did take away from my piece but with only three and a half minutes there wasn’t a great deal of time to establish a solid structure anyway. It’s an idea I’d like to explore in the future.

 

“Just different” – participant 

An abstract collection of voices from around the world tied together at Federation Square think aloud about their lives, in Melbourne and abroad, and come to the conclusion that perspective is everything.

IMG_2369

I didn’t know what I would get out of the people at Federation Square, but I knew I wanted to ask them about their lives, in Melbourne and abroad. I didn’t have a strong idea of what my piece would be and let myself be guided by the thoughts and ideas I recorded. I spoke to some extremely interesting people but there was very rarely a common theme that linked them beyond the city we’re in and the fact that they might not necessarily have originated here. I didn’t really have any set questions I was seeking out answers for, although since so many people were travellers that became something that I focused on.

In many ways, I was disappointed that people were so positive (that, or were negative in a way I don’t plan on distributing) – I think the material I gathered ended up affecting the balance of the piece. I would have liked to have explored people’s thoughts on the negatives of Melbourne more than I did.

It’s made me realise that in order to get a truly balanced piece I need to ask better questions. “What do you think about x” isn’t enough – I need to be specific, and ask directly for the pros and cons. I also noticed that a lot of answers I received were nearly unusable since they were taken out of context. You can barely, if at all, hear my voice, and when I asked a question the interviewee usually launched into their answer without referencing the question. For example, a two-way conversation about if they’ve enjoyed their travels translated when recorded to “Yes; all over, lots of – ; no, I don’t think so… I enjoy it a lot, I think I’m getting better, but I wouldn’t say that; pretty much, yeah.” Not helpful.

I was influenced by Just Another Fish Story, which has captivated me the most out of any of the listening that we’ve done. I like the way all those different voices and experiences came together to give real texture and depth to the story. I wanted to try something like that around a shared experience – in my case, the experience of being in Melbourne. I think my piece has a vague sense of structure but nothing approaching the beautiful sense of flow Fish Story has.

Recording was a hurdle for me. I went out with a Zoom recorder and a shotgun microphone – which I feel are good tools for the level of technical skill that I’m at – but need to work on harvesting a clear and balanced sound. Obviously, I need to record in mono next time if I’m using a shotgun mic with the Zoom. By the end of the course I’d like to expand on my skills to produce a sound closer to what I want but at the moment I want to focus on my structural and textural skills.

T-e-x-t-u-r-e

I wanted to explore texture further after this week. It strikes me, like many things in this course, that you have to immerse yourself to properly understand and learn – reading and conversation only goes so far.

With this in mind, I listened to my favourite podcast episode of all time to hear what the team at 99% Invisible use to create texture. I don’t love this particular episode because it has a fascinating topic or includes brilliant & captivating characters; I love it because it demonstrates the power of radio. At the end of 20-odd minutes, you realise you listened for 20-odd minutes to the story of reinforced concrete. And you enjoyed it. I took a closer look at ‘Rebar and the Alvord Lake Bridge’ to see what kind of techniques it uses to stay captivating. You can listen here.

Music
Background music is used to set the tone for the speakers and their place in the story arc. When the ‘villain’ of the piece (time and poor upkeep combined) is introduced, for example, the atmosphere of the music shifts to be more ominous.

Location & style
A variety of voice recordings are made. Roman Mars narrates from within the studio and then moves out into the field or onto the phone to interview experts.

Rhythm 
There’s a distinct rhythm between the studio and field records, narration and interview. The situation is introduced from the studio, then the listener is taken on-site; the audio moves between the two to provide exposition and context for what’s being said in on location.

Humanisation
I don’t know if it’s specifically texture but I noticed that anecdotes – both personal (and semi-irrelevant) and from history – are used to frame a dry and impersonal topic in a human light.

A1 reflection: Aw, saw Beyonce

My chief emotion during this assignment was frustration. Frustration with WaveLab, frustration with myself, fortunately no frustration with Bee who was a delight.

It’s clear to me that if I want to succeed in this subject and in future endeavours I need to master WaveLab. That could be easier said than done since there are so few online resources. There were things I wanted to do with my audio piece – in particular, tidy fades to make the piece lest abrupt – that I simply couldn’t figure out how to do. Exporting my piece was another problem.

That said, I can’t lead a software-centred witch burning without acknowledging that also held myself back. I listen to a lot of radio documentaries but I realise that my listening has been mostly passive. I know what good radio sounds like but I haven’t focused on what makes it so good. In future, I’m going to listen more carefully and when something strikes me as really working I’m going to take note of it. Not to copy what they did, of course, but to understand how it works and why.

Another concern I have is around copyright and fair use. I did use music in the background of the piece and I’m not entirely convinced what I did was up to scratch. It’s something I’ll have to learn about very carefully and specifically and I realise that if my assignment infringes copyright I’ll have to take it offline.

It wasn’t all terrible. I knew I would have an interesting interview with Bee and I was excited to use what I got from her. It’s interesting, but I didn’t realise the amount of pressure I would feel to represent her accurately. It would have been easy, for example, to pick out all the stories from her life and travels when things went wrong and to use those to paint her as a bit of a whinger. That wouldn’t have been accurate at all but it was important to include a few of those stories to add depth to the piece. I think I kept the balance between positive and negative fairly well, but like anything it’s a skill I have to practice.

Overall, I enjoyed making the piece when I knew what I was doing with the software and I’m looking forward to working on more.

10501746_10152491940719462_3742696252252641641_n