Symposium 12

The final symposium for the year, and potentially the final symposium for Network Media (emphasis on potentially because I still don’t really understand what’s happening with Media and Communications next year and whether or not subjects will still run).

Adrian spoke a lot about protocols. The difference between technological protocols and social protocols, how they overlap and Tim Berners-Lee’s protocol for the World Wide Web.

Online etiquette was also discussed, yet unfortunately as much as I tried to stay focused my mind started to drift to thinking about other things and what I was having for lunch so I didn’t get much from that discussion.

 

commandment10

Symposium 11

DATABASE 

That was the main focal point of this weeks symposium. At least that’s what I think it was. I tried so hard to stay attentive the whole way through but after about twenty minutes I realised that my mind had wandered somewhere completely off topic and I hadn’t been listening to much of the past discussion.

However, when Adrian began speaking about Design Thinking, I switched on again. He said that he believed we, as media students, should start looking at ourselves as designers. The  importance of designers is readily growing, demonstrating the effect they have on our surroundings. Designers make, learn and engage with things that exist in the world. Designers are prepped to make things that will have an impact on the future. Designers have the ability to look forward.

Symposium 4

In this weeks symposium one question that Adrian proposed was, “how can you judge the validity of things on the internet?” This began a long discussion on the different modes of practice that will indicate that something is valid. I thought that this question was very interesting and I was curious to see what everyone’s opinions were.

Betty stated that the validity depends on what platform the information is on and that it “won’t be valid until it has some investment journalism behind it.” Using Robin William’s passing as an example, she explained that until she had read the news on an online website such as The New York Times or The Guardian, she wouldn’t believe it. This made me think about the news/information that I read on social platforms such as Facebook and Twitter, a lot of which I believe without thinking twice about it. 80% of the time it is all true (or the majority of it), yet there have been times where recount what I have read to someone else to be met with a dumbfounded expression because it’s completely false.

Checking how many people are agreeing with the information, how many people are reading it, if other websites have the same facts – will all ensure that you have the correct information before you tell the rest of the world about it!

Symposium 3

These weeks “lecture” (un-lecture) was quite interesting. We discussed the validity of material on the internet (copyright!) and were able to ask questions.

On the Network Media blog Adrian made a list of the questions of the week. See them —-> here

Basically what I got out of this lecture was that EVERYTHING is or could be copyrighted. It’s tiring to think about but it has made my opinion on Creative Commons much clearer – we should all use CC.