Media Project Brief 4

I think we were able to approach this assignment in a creative way that was informed by our research rather than just presenting it. Through brainstorming we were able to move away from a video documentary and onto something new that pushed our boundaries. Deciding on broadcast felt like a risk, however it allowed us to explore the effects that festival programming has on the audience of film festivals in a way that challenged what people would have expected.

By focussing on film festivals within the topic of institutions we were able to refine and present a clear idea in our final product. Film festivals were interesting to me in particular, because a lot of research had only recently surfaced about how a festival programming directly affects its audience. This let us know that our topic was not only interesting but not overly explored, giving us reason to conduct some of our own research. We interviewed people about the three festivals we were focusing on. These results enabled us to rewrite our scripts to include thoughts and feelings from our research group, resulting in a more accurate and informed final product. The interviews also satisfied our want to get out and talk to people as outlined by our collaborative contract.

As helpful as these interviews turned out to be collecting the information was challenging. I often felt uncomfortable talking to new people and unsure if I was asking the right questions. To improve this skill I will continue to challenge myself by conducting more ethnographic research. I will work to refine my questions to create key points in the discussion, but I need to be wary becoming overly caught up on wanting to reach that next key discussion point. This is something I mentioned in my Third Project brief when interviewing Maria. Although I’ve improved I still find myself too eager to jump ahead rather than taking note of how things are being said and if there’s additional information body language can tell. To continue improving I need to slow down when I’m interviewing people and really notice. It may also help to keep a field diary to make note of expressions, body language and tones. Video recording interviews would also help as I could then watch back to see anything I’ve missed that could be explored further.

During the semester I have continually noticed sound as an area for improvement. As it was suggested after our first draft we tested with different equipment and distances, we found these sound tests produced a huge increase in the quality of our work. By draft two the sound was already much more audible because we’d took time to run a test beforehand. This is something I will continue to undertake during my media practice as I can’t stress enough how much our work has improved. Next time I would like to try testing different volumes for voices and an even wider selection of mics/recorders as we were limited in what we could obtain, as we overlooked this in our final project with some audio ended up to soft.

A more problematic area of our final work was our expression of the script overall. In our first feedback session we were asked to give “not only ham, but the whole pig.” We revised the script by pointing out certain areas where the camp could be played up, but ignores the rest of the script. To help improve on expression I think a director should be assigned next time to steer how everyone is delivering their lines and more time to learn the script would also help as we would have been able to worry less about what we needed to say and more about how to say it. Recording everyone separately lost some of the comedic timing and energy was due to us no longer being able to bounce off each other. In the future as it could be beneficial to rehearse together before going splitting up. Another good idea would be including clearer cues in the script. I personally struggled with expression due to my shyness, and often found myself speaking too quietly and not wanting to hear my recordings back. To overcome this I’ll need to push myself to take on more speaking roles. Recording what I’m going to say on my own and listening back until I’m confident will help before I join everyone else.

In our group we were loose on roles and although we still made sure everyone had a task by the end of each meeting, I feel it would have been easier to ensure people knew what was expected of them at the start of the project. Listening to what others have to say is also an important collaboration skill, and had we not all gotten together and discussed our ideas we might have just been doing a simple documentary because that was my way of approaching the task. I am much happier I was able to listen to what Emily and Georgina had to suggest as we were able to all settle on the idea of the news-like broadcast – something I would have in no way come up with alone.

 

Reflection on Draft One

Today we were able to present our radio like clip to Dan in our tutorial. He understood the campy direction we wanted to take our research in but suggested we needed to “ham it up” because he wanted to see the whole pig.
To achieve this we have begun revising the script to highlight words or phrases that should be accentuated for comedic value.
We’ve also made note of Dan’s suggestion to use expressions, hand movement and acting because they can be heard even through the recording. A challenge we face however is that to improve sound quality we’ll have to record alone, hopefully we’ll still be able to achieve that intensity and comedic timing by remaining in the room to play off each other, even if only one person is running through their lines.
When addressing sound quality we were also make sure we are not only using individual mics, but proceed to test sound levels and statics to ensure a clear recording. The use of a fuzzy and testing of different recorders has also been suggested.

Overall we’re moving on into our second draft with a clear idea of what we need to fix to improve our artefact.

Does My Voice Sound Like That?

On Tuesday our team was able to record the first draft for our media project on film festivals. On our first run through of the script I noticed a few problems that I’d like to be more aware of in the future.

For example I found myself often talking to fast and mispronouncing words, however I feel this could be fixed by making sure the next few weeks are really spent rehearsing my part and speaking slower.
To make sure rehearse is goes smoothly it’s necessary that  as a group we get our script finalised. Improv is always welcome but I think it’s important to really nail down those key points we need to hit. Hopefully this Thursday we’ll be able to receive feedback on the script so we can revise it, and tighten it up. Once all the key information is in I feel we will have more room to experiment with comedic timing and other media we might want to introduce. It’s still unsure whether or not we’ll film this script, but based on the feedback  I think this will be resolved before the second draft is due.

Overall I feel like we are on the right path and I am excited to continue work on this project.

Interviews

Over the weekend i’ve been interviewing friends about film festivals for our project. Although I’ve gotten good results, it’s as we discussed in class, it really is a talent to interview people. To improve these skills i’ve brainstormed a few ideas to help me in the future:

For research I think it’s wise to approach a variety of different people with my interview questions. During the week I mostly talked to friends in their early twenties. Hopefully when we get to attend a film festival over the next week I’ll have a chance to talk to a board range of people rather than relying on those who are convenient and I feel comfortable talking to.

To help with me feeling comfortable around approaching new people, I think it’s in my best interest to really figure out how I want my interview to answer. This can be achieved by really nailing down not only my questions but my approach. For  example when conducting research this weekend though I started by telling interviewees that I was asking them questions about film festivals I often forgot to make clear that I was also interested in the programs of film festivals and often added that information in as an afterthought. To improve I will look to practice my approach on peers and look for feedback and really refine the questions I’m asking in the future.

Narrative and Non Narrative

It’s very often asked if experimental films have form or narrative? At first glance it’s easy to dismiss an film without words, characters or a clear conclusion. However I believe that it’s through pattern, and repetition that form and narrative can be conveyed in films that are more abstract. For example in the film we watched today ‘We Have Decided Not To Die’  I think still has a narrative that runs through it, even if it wasn’t it’s intention. The act of framing the the film into three separate rituals gives us the impression of three acts, or in this case there are three different stories being told. Even the title seems to give the three protags causality they have all chosen not to die so it’s a way you can make sense of whats happening to each of the figures in the story, it also seems like the characters go from one state to another mimicking that of a journey.  In class we came up with our own reasons as to what made this film narrative and non-narrative.

Narrative
-the film is broken up into parts to follow (each ritual)
-the characters seem to go from one state to another
-the title explains the will behind the three protags
-each part has an emotion low follow be an emotion high

Non Narrative
-visions of weird stuff happened, no representation, nothing is said
-whole piece is in a state of chaos
-lack of conclusion
-characters are props, no motivation

Although I agree with a lot thats said here, but I still believe that just because there seems like there’s nothing literal going on a narrative can still be conveyed in ways that’s abstract, because there are many different ways of story-telling. Even though it’s not clear it still shows the journey of three different people who are choosing not to die.You can view the film here.

We Have Decided Not To Die from Sion Roberts on Vimeo.

Peer Feed Back

Emily

– I really enjoyed how Emily used camera shots to capture her subject. She focuses on shots of the hands, eyes and lips to capture body snippets of body language and character rather than letting it go unnoticed. This allows a more intimate relationship with her subject resulting in the viewer to more readily connect to her story.
– With the footage Emily used I felt that because she had a lot of stuff recorded and found, she wanted to use it all. Her film wasn’t overly cluttered or hard to understand, but could have been tightened up with a little bit more self editing.
– Otherwise I really enjoyed her film and the story she was able to capture.

Georgina

– I was effected by the powerful juxtaposition of the clinical images and the homely family conversation at the dinner table. I thought it was a powerful way to capture both sides of the subject and the situation.
– The sound was sometimes distracting as it would cut out at times and bits were louder than others but that’s something that can be improved on over time.
-I really connected emotionally with the story being told and thought she did a great job.

Project Brief 3 Media Portrait

Maria from Chrys on Vimeo.

At the start of this project I found myself apprehensive about working with the Sony MC50 video recorder. I think my inexperience shows as I knock the camera a few times and shaky cam rears it’s ugly head. In continuing in this course I would like to get more comfortable around the equipment I am working with and become more confident holding a camera.

I tried using a tripod to limit these  errors however I found it better hold the camera across from Maria, chatting like we usually do. Not only did it make her feel more comfortable but it allowed the piece to become more of a conversation rather than a questionnaire.

I chose Maria, for this project because whenever we talk I can’t help but listen to whatever she has to say. I thought this was an important quality to capture in my piece. I achieved this by using found footage to enhance her story rather than distract from it and using a series of close ups to really draw attention to what I felt was the most important parts of her story, focusing on her mouth.

The found footage I used was a mix of old animations and burlesque. Burlesque not only being something my subject was very interested in, but I felt fit the themes of sexuality. The old animations I used, helped me show things I wanted to be less literal things like fluidity or the act of vomiting. Overall I am mostly happy with my combination of found footage and actual footage to tell a story.
I also found myself experimenting more with sound this project, using music over vocals rather than being to timid to combine the two in project brief 2 and editing with things such as volume and fade ins/outs. I am pleased that I have spent more time working on sound this brief even if I still have a long way to go.

A big challenge that came with project was how much footage I had, and choosing when I had to cut back. This is still something I need to work on as portraits need to really speak volumes about a person and by adding to much footage your best pieces can get lost.

I also want to improve on titles and credits in my next piece.

A Process

“Quick hands up, who’s never used a camera.”

I am the only one with my arm in the air. I try not to be embarrassed remind myself that I am learning. It’s a mantra a lot of us seem to have especially when it came to presenting our work today; I am learning.

After viewing everyone’s self portraits I am inspired and intimidated (this is a part of learning). I now am aware of new things I want to improve on going into project three. A few things I’ve noted down are:

– sound and sound editing
– narrative and structure
– avoiding cliques
– improving on footage used in terms of quality and relevance
– learning when to cut back

Self Portrait – Reflection

How did you represent yourself?

I was sorta afraid to talk a lot about myself, I choose to represent a past version of me, something I wasn’t anymore.I didn’t really talk about family or who I was, making it hard for people to give me feedback. I’m worried that without me really wanting to put myself out there a lot of people maybe didn’t understand what I was trying to go for. Other people weren’t afraid to get super personal. For some people I was able to see what they were trying to represent quiet well in there pictures, there stories only helped clarified a few things.
It’s uncanny how much a single photo or piece of audio can strum up a lot of memories, even though some of us really didn’t choose to share them.

Artefacts work like that, they are meant to invoke a sense of story and understanding. Nothing exists in a vortex, every piece of media you put into the world is representative of you so it’s important to understand how your artefacts present you.
For me, I felt like some of my artefacts were to literal, they were of me rather than a representation of me, which is something i’ll have to be aware of in the future.