Media Project Brief 4

I think we were able to approach this assignment in a creative way that was informed by our research rather than just presenting it. Through brainstorming we were able to move away from a video documentary and onto something new that pushed our boundaries. Deciding on broadcast felt like a risk, however it allowed us to explore the effects that festival programming has on the audience of film festivals in a way that challenged what people would have expected.

By focussing on film festivals within the topic of institutions we were able to refine and present a clear idea in our final product. Film festivals were interesting to me in particular, because a lot of research had only recently surfaced about how a festival programming directly affects its audience. This let us know that our topic was not only interesting but not overly explored, giving us reason to conduct some of our own research. We interviewed people about the three festivals we were focusing on. These results enabled us to rewrite our scripts to include thoughts and feelings from our research group, resulting in a more accurate and informed final product. The interviews also satisfied our want to get out and talk to people as outlined by our collaborative contract.

As helpful as these interviews turned out to be collecting the information was challenging. I often felt uncomfortable talking to new people and unsure if I was asking the right questions. To improve this skill I will continue to challenge myself by conducting more ethnographic research. I will work to refine my questions to create key points in the discussion, but I need to be wary becoming overly caught up on wanting to reach that next key discussion point. This is something I mentioned in my Third Project brief when interviewing Maria. Although I’ve improved I still find myself too eager to jump ahead rather than taking note of how things are being said and if there’s additional information body language can tell. To continue improving I need to slow down when I’m interviewing people and really notice. It may also help to keep a field diary to make note of expressions, body language and tones. Video recording interviews would also help as I could then watch back to see anything I’ve missed that could be explored further.

During the semester I have continually noticed sound as an area for improvement. As it was suggested after our first draft we tested with different equipment and distances, we found these sound tests produced a huge increase in the quality of our work. By draft two the sound was already much more audible because we’d took time to run a test beforehand. This is something I will continue to undertake during my media practice as I can’t stress enough how much our work has improved. Next time I would like to try testing different volumes for voices and an even wider selection of mics/recorders as we were limited in what we could obtain, as we overlooked this in our final project with some audio ended up to soft.

A more problematic area of our final work was our expression of the script overall. In our first feedback session we were asked to give “not only ham, but the whole pig.” We revised the script by pointing out certain areas where the camp could be played up, but ignores the rest of the script. To help improve on expression I think a director should be assigned next time to steer how everyone is delivering their lines and more time to learn the script would also help as we would have been able to worry less about what we needed to say and more about how to say it. Recording everyone separately lost some of the comedic timing and energy was due to us no longer being able to bounce off each other. In the future as it could be beneficial to rehearse together before going splitting up. Another good idea would be including clearer cues in the script. I personally struggled with expression due to my shyness, and often found myself speaking too quietly and not wanting to hear my recordings back. To overcome this I’ll need to push myself to take on more speaking roles. Recording what I’m going to say on my own and listening back until I’m confident will help before I join everyone else.

In our group we were loose on roles and although we still made sure everyone had a task by the end of each meeting, I feel it would have been easier to ensure people knew what was expected of them at the start of the project. Listening to what others have to say is also an important collaboration skill, and had we not all gotten together and discussed our ideas we might have just been doing a simple documentary because that was my way of approaching the task. I am much happier I was able to listen to what Emily and Georgina had to suggest as we were able to all settle on the idea of the news-like broadcast – something I would have in no way come up with alone.

 

Reflection on Draft One

Today we were able to present our radio like clip to Dan in our tutorial. He understood the campy direction we wanted to take our research in but suggested we needed to “ham it up” because he wanted to see the whole pig.
To achieve this we have begun revising the script to highlight words or phrases that should be accentuated for comedic value.
We’ve also made note of Dan’s suggestion to use expressions, hand movement and acting because they can be heard even through the recording. A challenge we face however is that to improve sound quality we’ll have to record alone, hopefully we’ll still be able to achieve that intensity and comedic timing by remaining in the room to play off each other, even if only one person is running through their lines.
When addressing sound quality we were also make sure we are not only using individual mics, but proceed to test sound levels and statics to ensure a clear recording. The use of a fuzzy and testing of different recorders has also been suggested.

Overall we’re moving on into our second draft with a clear idea of what we need to fix to improve our artefact.

Does My Voice Sound Like That?

On Tuesday our team was able to record the first draft for our media project on film festivals. On our first run through of the script I noticed a few problems that I’d like to be more aware of in the future.

For example I found myself often talking to fast and mispronouncing words, however I feel this could be fixed by making sure the next few weeks are really spent rehearsing my part and speaking slower.
To make sure rehearse is goes smoothly it’s necessary that  as a group we get our script finalised. Improv is always welcome but I think it’s important to really nail down those key points we need to hit. Hopefully this Thursday we’ll be able to receive feedback on the script so we can revise it, and tighten it up. Once all the key information is in I feel we will have more room to experiment with comedic timing and other media we might want to introduce. It’s still unsure whether or not we’ll film this script, but based on the feedback  I think this will be resolved before the second draft is due.

Overall I feel like we are on the right path and I am excited to continue work on this project.

Interviews

Over the weekend i’ve been interviewing friends about film festivals for our project. Although I’ve gotten good results, it’s as we discussed in class, it really is a talent to interview people. To improve these skills i’ve brainstormed a few ideas to help me in the future:

For research I think it’s wise to approach a variety of different people with my interview questions. During the week I mostly talked to friends in their early twenties. Hopefully when we get to attend a film festival over the next week I’ll have a chance to talk to a board range of people rather than relying on those who are convenient and I feel comfortable talking to.

To help with me feeling comfortable around approaching new people, I think it’s in my best interest to really figure out how I want my interview to answer. This can be achieved by really nailing down not only my questions but my approach. For  example when conducting research this weekend though I started by telling interviewees that I was asking them questions about film festivals I often forgot to make clear that I was also interested in the programs of film festivals and often added that information in as an afterthought. To improve I will look to practice my approach on peers and look for feedback and really refine the questions I’m asking in the future.

BrainStorming Artefacts

In todays tutorial we were able to get together and share our research.  For my articles I found that the programming of LBGT festivals to be a interesting because it showed how the organisation of the festivals could inform and define the collective “we” within in the audience. The article which can be found here  also includes missions statements an information about the film festivals, which is not only informative but provides us with an idea of how to start our research. Georgina also suggested how it was interesting to see if film festivals should be seen as a business or  something for the community which I feel also fits when looking at programming.

When braining storming for our artefact, Emily suggested doing a snappy news reel, that talks current film festivals about how programming is being used to capture each audience. We continued our brain storming coming up with ideas such as; podcasts of interviews, vlogs of our film festival experiences, a feature article, a program of the festival involving the same tongue and cheek tactics involved in the news reel.  We also considered establishing a hashtag on twitter where people can share there experience attending certain festivals exploring why they went and how they enjoyed it.

Overall we all really enjoyed the news reel idea and have decided to pursue it by Tuesday next week we are all expected to come up with a script and ideas surrounding a film festivals program and how their trying to capture audiences.

Mindmaping

Brainstorming done in todays tutorial about institutions.  We as a group started with the two institutions that interested us, Cinema and Network TV. We began to list different forms of cinema and tv and connect issues to them under: economical, political, cultural and social brackets. Some of the ideas and issues we came up with are:

– What are the benefits of watching movies at an institution?
– Censorship and cultural control
– How cinema is used to breach cultural gaps
– How cinema uses it’s practice to target it’s audience

From here after a discussion with Dan we were able to narrow down our focus and look at how Film Festivals as an institution capture a lot of the ideas we were toying with above. We as a group are looking at how Film Festivals are an institution and what role they play politically, culturally and socially. A good starting point for us, when looking for articles would looking at how film festivals are defined as institutions, what they afford and prohibit their audiences or a good case study of how film festivals are used in Melbourne to cover the four main issues we’ve identified.

To start we’re each going to look at least five articles around film festivals before we meet on Tuesday where we will then see what we’ve found and what we can add. Overall I’m pleased with how well we all worked as a group today and excited to continue our brief.