Personas In Pop Music

In class the idea was brought up that although in Taylor Swift’s new music video “Bad Blood” she is shown wearing bondage-like gear, we can’t sexualise her.
This was juxtaposed with the study that Nicki Minaj has single handily corrupted todays youth with her songs about her Superb Ass  and pill popping. (see Super Bass)

For me this was a clear example of a pop-star’s persona in action, it’s easy to play the good girl next door when you look like Taylor Swift. You can’t really image a doe eyed blonde haired girl playing another role really. It’s in the same way we are able to jump to this conclusion that most people are readily able to look at a woman like Nicki Minaj and describe her as exotic, sexy, and animalistic. In a way pop-star’s only have so much control over how the public wants to view them.

Theres a lot of stigmas around how a black woman’s body is used in media.  It’s often sexualised and dehumanised in a way where it is described rather than beautiful it is always raw, animal, exotic. She is never a woman but a creature ready to be let out and tamed. More of this discussion can be found online, but here is a good start.

There things we can never associate with “wholesome” persona’s like that of Taylor Swifts. This is even played out in her video Shake it Off, where she is shown “twerking” We are presented with an image of Taylor giving a half hearted embarrassed shake, and even if it’s unknowingly it’s still making a clear dichotomy between her and stars that exist in the industry. Stars like Nicki Minaj.

In Nicki’s video Anaconda it’s easy to at first glance see it as a way to play up the persona given to her by the media. However on closer analysis it’s easy to see how Nicki plays with the idea of objectification and works to give herself agency. Lets break it down

The song Anaconda samples good old Sir Mix A Lots, “Baby’s Got Back” a song that’s cemented its self in our pop culture. However she subverts this idea as she “shifts the common narrative of a man conquering female bodies to Minaj’s own stories of sexcapades without apologies.” [1] This is further reinforced in the video by showing images of her covering herself in whipped cream only to have the following shot be one of her slicing a banana in half angrily or sitting Drake down on a chair and giving him the lap dance of his life that ends, once he puts his hands on her. Throughout the video we can see that Nicki is in control. Rather than letting you decide what persona you can ascribe to her, she is telling you that her body belongs to her and is not yours to consume. She doesn’t give a fuck what your anaconda wants.

Does My Voice Sound Like That?

On Tuesday our team was able to record the first draft for our media project on film festivals. On our first run through of the script I noticed a few problems that I’d like to be more aware of in the future.

For example I found myself often talking to fast and mispronouncing words, however I feel this could be fixed by making sure the next few weeks are really spent rehearsing my part and speaking slower.
To make sure rehearse is goes smoothly it’s necessary that  as a group we get our script finalised. Improv is always welcome but I think it’s important to really nail down those key points we need to hit. Hopefully this Thursday we’ll be able to receive feedback on the script so we can revise it, and tighten it up. Once all the key information is in I feel we will have more room to experiment with comedic timing and other media we might want to introduce. It’s still unsure whether or not we’ll film this script, but based on the feedback  I think this will be resolved before the second draft is due.

Overall I feel like we are on the right path and I am excited to continue work on this project.

Interviews

Over the weekend i’ve been interviewing friends about film festivals for our project. Although I’ve gotten good results, it’s as we discussed in class, it really is a talent to interview people. To improve these skills i’ve brainstormed a few ideas to help me in the future:

For research I think it’s wise to approach a variety of different people with my interview questions. During the week I mostly talked to friends in their early twenties. Hopefully when we get to attend a film festival over the next week I’ll have a chance to talk to a board range of people rather than relying on those who are convenient and I feel comfortable talking to.

To help with me feeling comfortable around approaching new people, I think it’s in my best interest to really figure out how I want my interview to answer. This can be achieved by really nailing down not only my questions but my approach. For  example when conducting research this weekend though I started by telling interviewees that I was asking them questions about film festivals I often forgot to make clear that I was also interested in the programs of film festivals and often added that information in as an afterthought. To improve I will look to practice my approach on peers and look for feedback and really refine the questions I’m asking in the future.

Institutions

 

A mindmap done in todays lectuorial, discussing Facebooks characteristics as an institution.

Some of the main points that came out of this brainstorm were privacy and ubiquity. I thought the idea of Facebook being so omnipresent also helped create a sense of exclusivity. When logged off Facebook it can feel like you’ve cut connections from the entire world because of how quickly information is received and then buried. For you not to have an account means you’re out on a bigger picture is often used by the simple technique “like us on Facebook to see more.” It highlights the idea that Facebook is where it’s all happening and for  you to not have an account you’re missing out on all the exclusive offers or deals only avaliable to those who are. If you’re not experiencing Facebook, you’re not experiencing
Our research on institutions has mostly been related to how film festivals use there programs to market towards audience. So I think it was helpful to look at how Facebook’s ideals and qualities have also been used.

Moving Forward

Today we presented our script on informing people how to navigate the film festival circuit. We explained we’d be using camp to push what an important role programming plays in attracting the intended audience, however we were
given the feedback that it was important that our research didn’t get lost in all of our camp. To allow the research to flow through more clearly we’ve devised some questions to ask a range of people as to why they attend film festivals to really bring together and define our scripts. On the weekend we’re  working on conducting interviews and finalising scripts. We are on track and have set goals to record everything by Tuesday. I am happy with how things are progressing and look forward to seeing how our script will translate to film or broadcast.

The questions we have decided to focus on are:

Why would you go to the film festival? 

How did you hear about any of these film festivals? 

Out of these three  film festivals which would you be most interested in going to? Why? 

Are you interested in learning anything from attending this festival? 

From this program which movies or events would you attend?

By showing a range of people the programs, along with the questions I think it would really help us grasp what techniques draw people towards the festivals. 

 

Audience Participation In Storytelling

When discussing audience this week, I couldn’t help but think about media that actively asks for the audiences participation in order for the narrative to unfold. “Vote for what you want to happen next” experiments give the audience agency. They feel as if they are in control, even within the strict options set by the writer. One of the most memorable acts of audience participation for me would have to be Batman’s; A Death in the Family. Where readers were asked to call in to decide the fate of sidekick Robin.
What I’m reflecting on today is how we can use Audience Participation in Game Narratives. The idea of the audience being able to take control of the way a story unfolds without flipping back the page is something in interested in. Although games like ‘The Walking Dead’ are popular and use audience participation affectively, users still have the chance to replay the game whenever they want or watch other endings through youtube. I am looking into the idea of an absolute the ideas that audience participation actively shapes the rest of the liner story.

With todays use of kickstarting and crowd funding it’s not unrealistic to suggest that audience participation could be used with the main writers able to shape and form the main ideas. However is the idea of the choice being in our hands put us at direct fault when something eventually goes wrong? Is the wonder of what would have happened if I had voted the other way something to conflicting for fiction?

Overall I think this is where the problem lies, we don’t want to actively be responsible for drawing out the end of something we love but maybe there is something to audience being able to voice there ideas within the brainstorming stage because writers can see what’s at stake and whats interesting but it’s only something time will tell.
I’m also attaching a game I’ve played on  new-grounds game: ‘One Chance’ I think it employees an interesting mechanic when it comes to audience participation and story telling.

Play ‘One Chance’ here.

Fandom

“fan cultures are a problem for legitimate culture because they muddy it, demanding attention to there culture. “

Taken from todays lecture, when shown I couldn’t help but think about the fandom that forms around children tv show: My Little Pony. 

Cartoons are often a mixed audience of the children the show is intended for and the adults who are also avid viewers. However the a lot of the adult male fandom of My Little Pony, wanted a distinction from the rest of the shows audience and coined the term. “Bronys” 

Bronys not only needed to establish that they were in fact a male audience (evidence by the name it’s self a mixture of Bro and Pony but their insistent to call older female fans, Pegasisters.) enjoying a “girls” cartoon, but also they’re “real fans of the show.”Although it’s been suggested that theres nothing wrong with adults enjoying media originally targeted at children, the idea of Bronys are less about enjoying a show, but the act of a like minded audience trying to reassure themselves that it’s okay to like a show target towards little girls and when that failed they tried to make the show theres. 

The fact that most conventions panels start with, if there are any little ones in the audience can we please allow them to the front. This example shows that rather than being welcomed little girls are pushed out of a space that had every intention of belonging to them. 

BrainStorming Artefacts

In todays tutorial we were able to get together and share our research.  For my articles I found that the programming of LBGT festivals to be a interesting because it showed how the organisation of the festivals could inform and define the collective “we” within in the audience. The article which can be found here  also includes missions statements an information about the film festivals, which is not only informative but provides us with an idea of how to start our research. Georgina also suggested how it was interesting to see if film festivals should be seen as a business or  something for the community which I feel also fits when looking at programming.

When braining storming for our artefact, Emily suggested doing a snappy news reel, that talks current film festivals about how programming is being used to capture each audience. We continued our brain storming coming up with ideas such as; podcasts of interviews, vlogs of our film festival experiences, a feature article, a program of the festival involving the same tongue and cheek tactics involved in the news reel.  We also considered establishing a hashtag on twitter where people can share there experience attending certain festivals exploring why they went and how they enjoyed it.

Overall we all really enjoyed the news reel idea and have decided to pursue it by Tuesday next week we are all expected to come up with a script and ideas surrounding a film festivals program and how their trying to capture audiences.

Storytelling

“Everything is story, story is everything.”

This weeks reading: The Substance of Story focuses heavily on how writers/storytellers use protagonists cause an audience reaction. Although I found the reading to be extremely interesting and helpful it began to make me wonder about if you could tell a story without using a protagonist.

Audience want to recognise a shared humanity in their movie characters, as long as your paper clip character, has some eyes and a strong desire to fix his problems a bond is formed with him.  So what happens if you take away character and focus on subjects? Is the story about the tree falling in the forest a story without a person there to duck and weave a branch? Can we as creatives tell stories using subjects rather than characters?

An example that sprung to my mind was Stan Brakhage experimental film: The Dante Quartet, a short silent film which was created by painting images directly onto the film. There are no characters only text and movement of colour divided into four parts: Hell Itself, Hell Spit Flexion, Purgation and existence is song. 

For me the spilt into four different parts tell a story of a journey through hell, and the way the paint moves faster or colours are repeated show what each of these stages are like. This feels like a narrative without a protagonist however it’s easy to say that the film maker is the protagonist or that it’s simply not a narrative at all.

This question is something I might want to look into exploring through the continuation of my course.

You can watch The Dante Quartet here

Mindmaping

Brainstorming done in todays tutorial about institutions.  We as a group started with the two institutions that interested us, Cinema and Network TV. We began to list different forms of cinema and tv and connect issues to them under: economical, political, cultural and social brackets. Some of the ideas and issues we came up with are:

– What are the benefits of watching movies at an institution?
– Censorship and cultural control
– How cinema is used to breach cultural gaps
– How cinema uses it’s practice to target it’s audience

From here after a discussion with Dan we were able to narrow down our focus and look at how Film Festivals as an institution capture a lot of the ideas we were toying with above. We as a group are looking at how Film Festivals are an institution and what role they play politically, culturally and socially. A good starting point for us, when looking for articles would looking at how film festivals are defined as institutions, what they afford and prohibit their audiences or a good case study of how film festivals are used in Melbourne to cover the four main issues we’ve identified.

To start we’re each going to look at least five articles around film festivals before we meet on Tuesday where we will then see what we’ve found and what we can add. Overall I’m pleased with how well we all worked as a group today and excited to continue our brief.