Hypertext 3.0

This reading contained many ideas about hypertext and like I have said in a previous blog, not all of them sink in. Certain things stand out to me that are of interest, I write them down and have a think about them. One point that got my attention was that ‘hypertext becomes experiential’. This might seem strange but I really like this word, EXPERIENTIAL. Meaning we don’t just absorb passively but we gain something from an experience.

‘Experiential learning is the process of making meaning from direct experience’

Landow explains in this reading that idolatry of the author is limited because the reader participates in the text and therefore multiple beginnings and endings are created. I see it like the reader being an editor and can create new meaning from the text by placing emphasis on the particular parts they want to make meaning from.

This sparked the thought in my mind about Barthes’ theory. Death of the Author.

“To give a text an Author” and assign a single, corresponding interpretation to it “is to impose a limit on that text.”

Who is network literate?

DIL Framework - iStock_000018373461

I’m feeling it’s a little blurry when it comes to determining when I can consider myself network literate. Is it a matter of opinion? If I can navigate my way around the web, click on links, type in URLs, embed files in my blog, type a little bit of HTML and work out the validity of stuff I read on the internet is this not being network literate? Or do I need to take it that next step further? Understanding the behind the scenes features of the web such as the nature of databases and coding, does that make me network literate?  Where is the scale that tells me how I’m doing?

I am aware that changing a tyre on a car does not make me a mechanic (for the record I can’t change a tyre but this was the example used in class). So who says you have qualified for the title of mechanic? Is it when you do an apprenticeship and someone gives you a certificate? Or when you have been taught by your dad how to fix cars since you were a kid- this person may even have more knowledge than the person who received the certificate?  So is it then about having a piece of paper, level of knowledge, ongoing practice or something else I’m missing? You don’t need a certificate to be print literate or network literate. My Grandma is without a doubt network illiterate; she’s barely mobile phone literate. So if I know more about the internet than my Grandma but less than someone who creates the webpages and sets up databases then am I network literate or not?

Print literacy does not pre-exist us

In the symposium this week there was a discussion based around the limitations of print literacy vs network literacy. Neither of these literacies pre-exist us- people must keep doing it in order for it to exist. One question was ‘will the printed book ever become non-existent?’ The answer to that is as long as people are reading them they will exist. It reminds me of a reading in another subject about Raymond Williams. In order for a technology (or technical invention) to be a technology it must be used, and to use something we must have the knowledge to do so. Where there is no knowledge and no use it will no longer become needed.

Predictions

The big question I ask myself heading into the media industry is: ‘Will I be able to stay up to date with the industry?’.

Reading predictions from engineers and scientists written in the 1940s and 1980s about technologies we now have today gets me thinking where is technology heading? We seem to learn a lot about the history of communications and technologies but so far not so much about the future.  I’m not sure if that’s something that is covered in this course but what I do know is how important it is to stay current. I would say heading into any profession, university isn’t the end of the learning road, especially when working in media. So, how do you stay current? Well, I guess this is where network media and being network literate comes in.

Some predictions for social media here. 

To the floppy disk and beyond

1117551-floppyHypertext’s physical function is allowing the user/reader to click on a highlighted text with their mouse and it will take them to another webpage, which may contain more text or images. The psychological function of hypertext is simply that it makes life easier for humankind. When I read often my mind will wander, some things that I read will sink in and some things won’t. The parts that sink in might spark an interest or an idea and unlike reading a book, with hypertext I can continue exploring that idea or thought in one click of a button.

When reading Nelson’s Literary Machine’s I pictured him as someone wanting to make the world a better place, to make it easier. This seems to be the same motivation that Douglas Engelbart had, he was the inventor of the computer mouse and developer of hypertext. Also Aaron Swartz who was involved in the development of RSS, Creative Commons and Reddit. Aaron’s goal was to make the sharing of information easier and make knowledge more accessible to the world.

So, rather than trying to understand the nerdy diagrams in this reading, one thing I took from it was the passion and motivation to move beyond the floppy disk (and thank God we did), to move into the world where offices become paperless and your thoughts and ideas you wrote on that fluro green post-it note this morning don’t get lost amongst the piles of rubbish on your desk.

‘Computers should bring simplification not complication’.  Ted Nelson

If you’re offended raise your hand

One point that stood out to me in this week’s symposium in relation to defamation is when posting content on the internet (specifically your blog) was that your intention is NOT a defence. If someone thinks what you have posted is offensive it is. I can definitely see the point here and my immediate thought was that can we bring this rule into our relationships- especially with family? I know in most cases the offender doesn’t realise what they have said and simply responds to the offendee (cannot guarantee this is an actual word) “well you just took it the wrong way”… and so it goes round and round in circles.  Ultimately if you are the creator of a site or owner of a blog YOU are responsible for its content- even if other people have posted comments that are inappropriate, it will always come back to you.

wonka-offend_thumb

 

 

Tute week three

Great in class discussions this week which I thought was a very good use of class time. Being able to ask questions and have open conversations about network media and blogging without being pressed for time. One benefit to being at uni is to make use of the lecturer’s and tutor’s knowledge and in most cases there is never any class time to do that.

Networking

There is that old saying it’s not what you know it’s WHO you know. How do you get to know more people? Network. The definition of networking is ‘a supportive system of sharing information and services among individuals and groups having a common interest’. Of course this is key in the media industry (although what you know is important too) the more contacts you have the more doors become open (or slightly ajar) for you. Blogging is a tool we as students can use to engage and explore this world of networking- online. In the reading Network Literacy: The New Path to Knowledge, Adrian describes network literacy is as much contributing to sharing the knowledge as it is to consume it. Network Literacy is about DOING, so as I didn’t have a Flickr account I decided I would get one and work out how to connect it to my blog like Adrian does. While having a look around the site I saw that Flickr Commons has two main objectives, one of which is:

‘To provide a way for the general public to contribute information and knowledge. (Then watch what happens when they do!)’

This ties in nicely with what Adrian was talking about.

Stay tuned for my Flickr debut.