In class: Total low. In New Zealand on Tuesday so will have to be more active in the Thursday class
Readings: Fine, i’m still quite engaged with Bogost’s ‘Alien Phemonology’. I have become extremely interested in his theories where this creates great conversation between me and dad which I really like
Blogging: Average… was really good last week with engagement, but when I go home I always slip off the constant blogging. It’s been a very difficult semester for me with getting sick and having to travel back and forth often
Assignements: Really good! I have already got started on my first video of the object which I am really enjoying to film and have so much to say about it. Still struggling a bit for the ‘action’ video as would love to film myself dancing (as don’t have any friends in Melb who dance) but not sure exactly how to do that yet and make it interesting… will keep thinking.
Group: We are going great. Just handed in the last Offenburg part which is awesome and our communication and engagement with one another is always on form. Really lucky for the group I had!
After going through my blog posts I realised that I never actually conducted a list of the 5 significant actions that will contribute to my performance for this studio. So here it is! (which I found in my notes)
- In class participation: asking questions, interacting with studio members, active engagement in conversation
- Readings
- Blogging
- Assignments
- Group: engagement, equal share of work, communication
I want to know why do we choose an object and then an activity to film that MATTERS to us, we have constantly been told to eliminate the idea of meaning and now we are bringing it back to us. Furthemore, doesnt this also reflect the human element and conflict ontology? I get so confused as we bounce back and forth between filming things that matter to us but then having to distance ourselves. Maybe this is the idea of it but I struggle to see what I am going to learn from this as a whole?
Defiantly a bit rough, not upset with the result but after the feedback from Adrian I should have defiantly spent a bit more time editing and making it tidy. I forgot to add my bibliography which is very embarrassing as well as my introduction should have included chapter 3 of Alien Phenomenology and why I am going to include it. I feel I am more confident in my writing but editing and introduction/conclusion defiantly needs work
1st video) an artefact/object e.g. something materialistic that matters to me
2nd video) an event/ activity that matters to me e.g. a dance, the way something moves (need to think carefully about this one)
3rd video) write the script first to the chosen quote (from any course reading), and then think of an image track that will work contrastingly with it
Narration) detailed description to describe the location/ and or what it is, noticing WITHOUT saying exactly what it is
I have some confusion here that I hope to get cleared up on Tuesday with Adrian.
- the first film is about a single thing you have that matters for you
- the second film is about one activity and in that activity one key action that you do that matters for you what does this mean? what does it mean by filming the single thing and then how does an activity relate to the second film deciding what you want to film. MAKES NO SENSE PLEASE HELP
- the third film is about one statement (quote) from any of the course readings that matters for you
In the thing and activity films there must be a narrational sound track. This sound track must detail the parts of the thing or action. It should not name the thing or action. It will involve you filming their single thing, and in the second film you deciding what you want to film, and why. Do not understand this in anyway
We have all started to find a bit of a nack for what we are good at. This had made the process and response to Offenburg a lot faster, but also I feel like we are adjusting to the criteria/ thinking differently from a humans perspective as we look at the object to object. Last weeks video response we had to Offenburg I feel was really successful as it contributed onwards from the editing techniques they had done, but we added our own contributed and understanding of what it is and what it does.
Once again I feel embarrassed with my blogging participation! This doesn’t necessarily relate to the course over all as I feel the group work and essay work as involved a lot of my participation BUT documenting this is less to sufficient…
Not only have blog posts been low but active engagement in class/ attending has not been great either. I have been so ridiculously unwell since just before easter it has really put a damper on in class participation.
Apart from this, I have been keeping actively engaged with Alien Phenomenology to make up for the lost time in class. I have started to discuss this heaps with my dad and he is really fascinated with it. I have really enjoyed reading this with him because he offers so much clarification and to look at things differently to how I might.