What I didn’t understand:

• “There is a considerable problem, if objects recede from one another, forever enclosed in a vacuum of their individual existences, how do they ever interact?” I feel this is so broad to where humans will never quite understand this, because clearly objects do interact but they are all individuals… 
• “The relationship between the first object and the second offers the clearest rendition, insofar as a metaphor is ever really clear”
• “Physical reductionist positions hop to erase the subjectivity of experience by explaining it away via underlying physical evidences”