After re-reading Bogost chapter two to try understand more in-depthly about what he is talking about I have come to what I think is a better understanding of what ontography is all about. The conclusion (right now) I have drawn upon is that it is a recording of things (lists or footage or sounds etc) mixed/contrasted together to constitute evidence of their intimacy and interaction.

Basically a break down in English for me (in relation to the currently project brief) it is a collaboration of sounds, mixed together to show the relationship between objects and or things.