Crafting Characters

In reflection to the previous class exercise, I wanted to gain more knowledge into creating insightful characters whose depth shaped the narrative action. Thinking back to characters that have inspired my writing and bore significance in generating a thoughtful plot, I was immediately led to write on my favourite author, the Australian Christos Tsiolkas. Although his work is not of the film/TV industry, rather novels (despite at least two of his works being adapted into a film and a TV series), the characters he created in The Slap and Barracuda drove me to invest in the characters unlike that I have experienced with other authors’ work.

Tsiolkas, an openly gay man born of an immigrant family from Greece, is known for possessing the ability to capture his vantage point as an outsider through his characters. As a writer, Tsiolkas has a gift for affecting his readers to relate to the character, not by imposing a fictional structure but by utilising experiences that in one way or another, everyone can personally relate to. This is evident in the award-winning The Slap, where unlike other works of fiction that had clear cut archetypes of protagonists and antagonists, Tsiolkas effectively blends morality and creates characters driven by motives that are all equally valid. Its hook, which the novel is titled after, is a very-Australian BBQ at which a man slaps a child he is of no relation to. Readers are instantly drawn to choose sides within the conflict; the hardworking, successful Harry whose thriving business provides for his ‘perfect’ upper-middle class family, or Rosie, a loving mother fighting for her ‘abused’ child’s right, despite struggling to make ends meet for her lower class family. Both sides in the conflict have their own ‘good’ and ‘bad’ qualities and narrate realistic human convictions of redemption and change.

Article Lead - wide6518096212t44iimage.related.articleLeadwide.729x410.12t1ya.png1421731297112.jpg-620x349When interviewed by Allen & Unwin about his work on The Slap, Tsiolkas shares the story which inspired his novel:

“I was at my parent’s house, a few years ago, and they were hosting a barbeque for relatives and friends. At the time there was a couple there, friends of mine, who had a three year old son. My mother was in the kitchen cooking up a storm – pita, pasticcio, potatoes – while Dad and “the men” were firing up the barbeque. I was in the kitchen helping my mother, and she, slightly frazzled with all she had to do, was getting annoyed that the three year old boy was opening up cupboards and drawers, taking out pots and pan and using them as building blocks. She kept trying to make him stop and go out and play, but he was taking no notice of her. Nearly tripping on a saucepan, she became exasperated with him, pulled him up gently and with the smallest of taps on the bum, said ‘No more!’

The little boy – and I won’t forget the look of shock on his face – placed his hands on his hips and said to my mother, ‘No-one has a right to touch my body without my permission!’ To which my mother replied, ‘You naughty, I smack you.’

There was no violence in her action and all the adults laughed, including the parents. But going home afterwards I couldn’t help but think over the incident and what it expressed about generational, cultural and familial change.”

Tsiolkas then continues to speak about how he wanted to experience the author’s joy of writing and creating characters by writing about his own backyard, but one thing is clear in this. Particularly in this novel, composed of chapters written from the viewpoint of varied individuals present at the incident, it is indisputable in this interview that Tsiolkas’ stories were inspired by characters from his own life.

Perhaps this is the key to crafting such thought-provoking narratives. In fact, other novels by Tsiolkas such as Merciless Gods, Loaded and Barracuda, tell the stories of outsiders, mostly immigrants and/or homosexuals, reimagined from his own life. This does not necessarily dictate that one should write about their life (though of course, you are welcome to do so), what is imposed is that aspiring writers should look into their own real stories for inspiration. After all, there is nothing that we are more knowledgeable of than the lives that we lead.

Pitch Reflection

This is in response to my findings in this week’s screenwriting exercise.

How useful was the exercise in helping to construct a story outline? How easy/hard was it to place your characters into your scenario? Did choosing a genre help to guide your story in any particular direction? Do you think this type of exercise is a good pathway into writing a screenplay? Why/why not?

It has been made evident that the action is not the sole force which drives the story. The characters’ three-dimensionality, bring out the conflict that provides interest in the plot (climax), and which they themselves, must encounter and solve (resolution). The action reveals itself as how they deal with the conflict they are presented with. The drama doesn’t just exist within the setting, rather within the characters’ pre-determined morals, ethics and characteristics and how they must balance these to fulfil their personal happy endings.

In this instance, it was quite easy for me to place the characters into the scenario. Andy and Bec have similar problems in terms of dealing with their parent’s predispositions about their life choices, and it was this that I played around with to find my story. I didn’t necessarily choose a genre beforehand, I just wrote a story and let itself dictate its genre.

I truly believe that this exercise was an effective method in drawing out a potential screenplay. A writer must at least think through (and jot down) their main characters’ primary characteristics. This is essential in deterring how they would react to the situation they are presented with and how their actions affect those around them. It’s highly possible that the characters themselves would warrant their own conflict, the quirkier and more eccentric they are written to be.

Pitch Experiment

These are my findings to this week’s screenwriting exercise:

Andy, 20

  • Male, half Filipino and half Maltese
  • Born of a middle class immigrant family in the Western Suburbs
  • University student studying Public Relations with a casual job in a music store
  • He has olive skin, dark hair and brown eyes. He is tall and lean with a swimmer’s build but has no interest in sports
  • Andy enjoys watching films and has an extensive knowledge of its history. He also has a liking towards jazz music. He is a homosexual and is currently single.
  • He used to have a strong relationship with his mother, until she couldn’t accept her sexuality. He has always been distant from his father who used to travel a lot for work. He is an only child.
  • The most important thing for him in the world is to escape the suburbs and to make a career for himself in the city. He dreams of being a ‘suit’ and socialising with other upper-middle class singles who are on top of their careers.
  • He loathes the idea of being a mixed race and always neglects to mention his Asian heritage. The idea of being an immigrant irritates him, when all he wants is to fit in.

Bec, 28

  • Female, Australian
  • Born of a wealthy upper class family based in Brighton, currently located in Windsor
  • Working as a bartender at a Cabaret bar in Fitzroy
  • She has rose blonde hair that has been cut harshly close to the roots and piercing blue eyes that are the first thing anyone notices about her. She is pale, heavily freckled and of average height
  • She is brash and uncaring for what other people think of her, all she truly cares about is fulfilling the idea of being “herself” even though most of what makes her who she is, is to spite her parent’s privilege. She hates anything remotely political (her parents were in media and politics) and her only true passion is diving.
  • She’s always been in a terrible relationship with her absentee parents, but is always in contact with her little brother, whom she adores terribly.
  • Even though her birth name is Rebecca, she refuses to be called so.

“A man and a woman are sitting across from each other at a small table in a dimly lit restaurant.”

BEC is having dinner with her mother at a cheap Chinese restaurant. She hadn’t seen her mum for at least two months and it is going terribly. Her mother, as soon as they sat themselves, begins asking her about her work and plans for the future and if she was in a relationship. To Bec’s agony, her mother claims that she should find herself a partner, as she is already twenty-eight and one night stands would not cut it. Bec spies a nervous looking man on the other side of the room sitting on his own. To spite her mother, Bec leaves the table to approach the man, and sits across from him with intentions of picking him up.

ANDY, surprised at Bec’s appearance begins to question her when his father arrives at the restaurant, late to their dinner. His father assumes that Bec is Andy’s girlfriend. With kicks under the table and invisible finger jabs, Andy introduces her as Sasha, his long time partner, and makes up stories about their past. Bec goes along with it, amused. Andy’s father stands up to order his meal and Bec questions Andy. He confesses that he fears he was summoned by his dad to confront him about his sexuality and how Bec must continue pretending to be Sasha. Andy claims that his father would excommunicate him if the pastor found out he’s gay and his dying mother’s heart would break. Andy’s dad returns to the table and asks Bec about her childhood. At this moment, Bec’s mother stands up, throwing cash at the table and approaches the company. She exclaims that “she’s had enough of this childish pettiness, Bec!” and leaves the restaurant. Confused, Andy’s dad asks her who the woman was and why she had called her Bec. Bec is speechless, unable to reason and Andy proclaims that he has news to share to distract his dad. Stumped, Andy reveals that Sasha and he were engaged. Andy’s dad stands up, exclaiming that his wife should meet their future daughter-in-law, he and Bec leaving the restaurant arm in arm.