Evolving the Pen

Possibly amongst the most intriguing pieces of reading I have had to do, the writer takes on the action of writing, which I would say has always been taken for granted, as a technology within itself. Bolter does not relegate this technological aspect to that of the printing press or the computer, but rather as writing being the catalyst for the development of other technological potential and the two mentioned as catalysts for writing potential. Did that even make sense, or am I not so articulate with this technology?

He goes on to mention the Ancient Greeks and the science they were invested in to successfully express abstract thoughts onto space, which we now consider as art and outdated. On the other hand, he criticises the invention of the press (and especially the computer) as “the first uniformly repeatable commodity, the first assembly line and the first mass-production.” The implication is that despite all this advancement, the writer is then pushed further away from the writing, making it more quantitative than qualitative. The machine permits duplication, efficient printing, as well as rapid editing without the writer having to exercise the same mental and physical processes as that of the Greeks.

But what really touched me is the commentary on the advantages of literate men (and women), specifically white, in the long tradition of literacy. One could not deny the fact that white people brought up in a Westernised environment, surrounded by English-speaking people, do have the advantage of having that base upbringing to further their literary skills. Being born in the Philippines does not give me the natural autonomy nor the wider vocabulary of my colleagues and indeed provides barriers in my expression at times.

The question I posed above is not the first time that I may have posed it. It is more challenging for immigrants like me when having to translate thoughts in our own foreign languages to that of English. And I am not speaking about immigrants with broken English either, though of course they are a part of this category. I must make my own way of reaching that same level of understanding through activities such as further reading. Just as it is easier for me to speak in Filipino-English (mixed), which my colleagues would not appreciate, writing is a state of mind that “is not possible to put away.”

Image from David.

Bush speculates on how we think

From here on out, to fulfill the number of posts we are required to put up, I shall be dividing my thoughts on each reading per post.

Beginning with Bush and his inferential article, I am led to believe that Science did not only “improve our lives”, but also opened the world to the wider community we live in, instead of the self-centered universes one was inclined to be content with in the past. Ultimately, Science enhanced communications beyond our personal circles of close friends and family, to what we now know as globalisation. It is simply, the thought that what I myself am writing, as of this moment, could be read half way around the world…as long as there is internet access, of course.

The writer also comments on how specialisation in Science found itself to having work not receiving its proper commendations. Many essential research are left abandoned, with no appropriate evaluation and unused. He criticises our reviewing methods as at the same level as many years ago, positively “medieval”. On the other hand, Bush suggests that what causes the advancement of our society today, is our access to resources (implemented by globalisation I assume), with basis on historical inventions close to modern technology that failed because of a lack in resource.

Our “modern” society continues to evolve, with methods of recording in the forefront and the transformation of new age photography.

Fish to fish

This first reading by Adrian is his own metaphorically poetic way of illustrating what exactly this subject is for us.

Basically, we are constituted to be that of a boat, amongst an ocean and/or sea of ideas. The boat does not have a specific destination, nor is there shore to be seen in the distance. Once again comes the idea that we are in charge…for this subject at least. It’s not about following a quota of work that we are expected to complete, but that we are expected to pave our own paths. Or in this case, row our own sea.

Just as in any learning environment, some will choose to row vigorously, some will choose to float by amongst the waves and live by the moment. If I was to take on a more biblical stance to the prose, we fish our own fish and it is up to me to decide the quality and quantity. Of course, there was no fish mentioned but you can’t blame me for going that-a-way with “sea of ideas”. Most importantly, it is up to me to open up myself to what is around me and believe that there is, fish to fish.