Crafting Characters

In reflection to the previous class exercise, I wanted to gain more knowledge into creating insightful characters whose depth shaped the narrative action. Thinking back to characters that have inspired my writing and bore significance in generating a thoughtful plot, I was immediately led to write on my favourite author, the Australian Christos Tsiolkas. Although his work is not of the film/TV industry, rather novels (despite at least two of his works being adapted into a film and a TV series), the characters he created in The Slap and Barracuda drove me to invest in the characters unlike that I have experienced with other authors’ work.

Tsiolkas, an openly gay man born of an immigrant family from Greece, is known for possessing the ability to capture his vantage point as an outsider through his characters. As a writer, Tsiolkas has a gift for affecting his readers to relate to the character, not by imposing a fictional structure but by utilising experiences that in one way or another, everyone can personally relate to. This is evident in the award-winning The Slap, where unlike other works of fiction that had clear cut archetypes of protagonists and antagonists, Tsiolkas effectively blends morality and creates characters driven by motives that are all equally valid. Its hook, which the novel is titled after, is a very-Australian BBQ at which a man slaps a child he is of no relation to. Readers are instantly drawn to choose sides within the conflict; the hardworking, successful Harry whose thriving business provides for his ‘perfect’ upper-middle class family, or Rosie, a loving mother fighting for her ‘abused’ child’s right, despite struggling to make ends meet for her lower class family. Both sides in the conflict have their own ‘good’ and ‘bad’ qualities and narrate realistic human convictions of redemption and change.

Article Lead - wide6518096212t44iimage.related.articleLeadwide.729x410.12t1ya.png1421731297112.jpg-620x349When interviewed by Allen & Unwin about his work on The Slap, Tsiolkas shares the story which inspired his novel:

“I was at my parent’s house, a few years ago, and they were hosting a barbeque for relatives and friends. At the time there was a couple there, friends of mine, who had a three year old son. My mother was in the kitchen cooking up a storm – pita, pasticcio, potatoes – while Dad and “the men” were firing up the barbeque. I was in the kitchen helping my mother, and she, slightly frazzled with all she had to do, was getting annoyed that the three year old boy was opening up cupboards and drawers, taking out pots and pan and using them as building blocks. She kept trying to make him stop and go out and play, but he was taking no notice of her. Nearly tripping on a saucepan, she became exasperated with him, pulled him up gently and with the smallest of taps on the bum, said ‘No more!’

The little boy – and I won’t forget the look of shock on his face – placed his hands on his hips and said to my mother, ‘No-one has a right to touch my body without my permission!’ To which my mother replied, ‘You naughty, I smack you.’

There was no violence in her action and all the adults laughed, including the parents. But going home afterwards I couldn’t help but think over the incident and what it expressed about generational, cultural and familial change.”

Tsiolkas then continues to speak about how he wanted to experience the author’s joy of writing and creating characters by writing about his own backyard, but one thing is clear in this. Particularly in this novel, composed of chapters written from the viewpoint of varied individuals present at the incident, it is indisputable in this interview that Tsiolkas’ stories were inspired by characters from his own life.

Perhaps this is the key to crafting such thought-provoking narratives. In fact, other novels by Tsiolkas such as Merciless Gods, Loaded and Barracuda, tell the stories of outsiders, mostly immigrants and/or homosexuals, reimagined from his own life. This does not necessarily dictate that one should write about their life (though of course, you are welcome to do so), what is imposed is that aspiring writers should look into their own real stories for inspiration. After all, there is nothing that we are more knowledgeable of than the lives that we lead.

10 Screenwriting Questions

Upon decluttering my stashed things from who knows when back then, I found a document from a Film and Television short course that I took part in early 2011. Titled “10 important questions to ask yourself”, I’d forgotten the context of this document. From glossing over the content, these questions for a writer would surely be of value to this course.

1) “What is the conflict?” Good stories have strong conflict. No conflict, no story.

2) “What’s the worst thing that can happen to this character?” Make that happen and then make the hero overcome it.

3) “What’s the opposite of what I’m thinking?” Is that an interesting event in the story? Is it better or worse?

4) “What would this character do if they couldn’t talk?” Movies are visual. It’s more important to show what a character does that hear what it is they say.

5) “Do I know the ending?” This will mean you have a goal to write towards; and you will finish the script too!

6) “Who knows what, when?” If you’re stuck, give one character a secret that another character is unaware of. This always results in conflict and tension.

7) “Do I break the story rules I’ve set up?” Consistency is important. If Spiderman can swing from a web, don’t get to the end and then say he can fly. The audience won’t believe you.

8) “Is it clear who my hero is?” The audience need someone to barrack for and identify with. This is usually the hero. There should be something about them that is like you and me. Something we can relate to.

9) “Is it clear who the bad guy is?” Just like the hero, there should be something about them that is just like you and me. Something we can relate to. This makes them real.

10) “What am I embarrassed about?” If you’re stuck for a story, ask yourself this question. The chances are it’s thrilling hilarious, tragic, or dramatic. All good things for stories!

Now try applying every single question to George RR Martin’s A Song of Ice and Fire and see how effective these are.

The Creative Ones

This is a delayed post on my first collaborative class with the Creative writing students, which actually happened last Thursday. But you can’t blame me, I spent a good part of the weekend feeling like I was dying with an illness.

Despite the initial territorial-like awkwardness between the Media and the Creatives (or was it just me?), especially with the large group number that we had, it turned out to be somewhat effective in the long run. After reading three of the four scripts we had written, they chose to work with mine as “it was the easiest to do” according to one American-sounding Creative. Surely, the task being a long take, we utilised a single back-track shot which ended with a slightly panning medium shot of Antonius, the protagonist, sitting at his favourite diner spot with June the hostess, slightly off centre on screen. By doing so, the antagonist, his mysterious stalker, can be shot within the same frame. Simple cinematography at its best.

In terms of the group dynamics, two other Creatives and I were actors in this scene, with Jen Farrow taking charge on direction, another Creative on camera and the rest having to sit out this exercise (like I said, group numbers were massive).

I suppose if there was one thing to take away from this exercise, it’s that when writing for screen, one must surely take into consideration the logistics and practicality of what is being written, on eventual production. In this case, I hadn’t included much dialogue and opted for long silences with continued muted action. But filming a scene in a location that isn’t staged nor having proper actors with physical stimuli to deal with, there was a lot of silence that had to be cut. Only because, well, there was nothing happening. Glances and slight looks aren’t useful in class exercises like this. In lieu of future class exercises, one should opt for shorter scripts so that we can play more with the technicalities of production and experiment with cinematography.