Evolving the Pen

Possibly amongst the most intriguing pieces of reading I have had to do, the writer takes on the action of writing, which I would say has always been taken for granted, as a technology within itself. Bolter does not relegate this technological aspect to that of the printing press or the computer, but rather as writing being the catalyst for the development of other technological potential and the two mentioned as catalysts for writing potential. Did that even make sense, or am I not so articulate with this technology?

He goes on to mention the Ancient Greeks and the science they were invested in to successfully express abstract thoughts onto space, which we now consider as art and outdated. On the other hand, he criticises the invention of the press (and especially the computer) as “the first uniformly repeatable commodity, the first assembly line and the first mass-production.” The implication is that despite all this advancement, the writer is then pushed further away from the writing, making it more quantitative than qualitative. The machine permits duplication, efficient printing, as well as rapid editing without the writer having to exercise the same mental and physical processes as that of the Greeks.

But what really touched me is the commentary on the advantages of literate men (and women), specifically white, in the long tradition of literacy. One could not deny the fact that white people brought up in a Westernised environment, surrounded by English-speaking people, do have the advantage of having that base upbringing to further their literary skills. Being born in the Philippines does not give me the natural autonomy nor the wider vocabulary of my colleagues and indeed provides barriers in my expression at times.

The question I posed above is not the first time that I may have posed it. It is more challenging for immigrants like me when having to translate thoughts in our own foreign languages to that of English. And I am not speaking about immigrants with broken English either, though of course they are a part of this category. I must make my own way of reaching that same level of understanding through activities such as further reading. Just as it is easier for me to speak in Filipino-English (mixed), which my colleagues would not appreciate, writing is a state of mind that “is not possible to put away.”

Image from David.

Dr. Norton and Mr. Pitt

At the desire to widen my cinema pallette, I have begun to watch older (and some not-so-old) films of different filmmaking styles. Possibly one of my most favourite not-so-old films is David Fincher’s Fight Club starring Brad Pitt, Edward Norton and Helena Bonham Carter. Although this film would not be suitable for everyone’s tastes, certainly not those with no stomach for blood and guts and other disgusting things. It does, however, possess a certain charm that is probably led by Brad Pitt’s character, Tyler Durden.

As with any film Pitt does, Fincher did not pass up the opportunity to have the actor show off his sculpted torso, as Durden rolled around the floor of a dingy basement with his myriad of blood-thirsty soldiers, doing what the title says – fight. This is a story about an insomniac office worker whose name is never mentioned (played by Norton), and whose chance encounter with Durden on a plane transforms his lifestyle to take on an politically ideological stance against capitalism.

The filmic style pertains a devil-may-care entity that holds no regard for anything civil, as Marla (played by Bonham-Carter) casually strolls through a busy road without looking left or right. The film is humorous, if beating yourself up to implicate your boss is considered as humour for you. Not to mention, the ending will certainly surprise the most aware of audiences, as the action takes on a psychological aspect. Without spoiling much details for the reader, this is the kind of film that one would either love or hate – there is no middle ground. However, I suggest that even if you did not enjoy the beginning of the film, one must stick with it and watch its entirety. I promise you, it gets better…but not for Norton’s character.

 

How to hide site title and tagline

This is for those bloggers out there who are wishing to use a custom header for their oh-so-special blogs!

I have been trying to work out how to do this and have finally managed to figure it out, so I am sharing this to you all (and the extra marks don’t hurt…)

This is my original home page for my blog:

FIRST, Go to your dashboard and click on Installed Plugins.

SECONDLY, Find Improved Simpler CSS amongst the list of plugins and click activate.

THIRDLY, Return to Dashboard and go under Appearance, where you will find Custom CSS that you activated. Delete the welcoming comment on the space.

LASTLY, Input the following code into the space:

#header {
display:none;
}
#site-description {
display:none;
}

And voila! Your site title and tagline are now invisible!

Now if you want to use a custom header and you already have it saved on your computer, stick around…

FIRSTLY, Go under Appearance and click Header.

SECONDLY, Upload the custom header you wish to use or choose image if you have used it previously. You will have the opportunity to crop and edit your header, but an image of 1000 x 200 pixels is recommended.

And here is the finish product:

Have fun designing!