Lenny and some accidents to be learnt

Any epiphany that I’ve really been tackling since the realisation that it was taking place is just how much my film making practice if we’re going to call it that, lacks in any proper technical facets so far. So it has been quite eye opening to confront this at this point in this studio, and realise just how far I have to improve in this respect. 

I guess the lack of professionalism stems from an amount of having not really needed to film things professionally but if I was to be honest to myself in this circumstance, I think it’s undeniable that I should apply a level of professionalism more in general to all of these scenarios, and this was even mentioned in class. That is, when it was mentioned that our phone usage while shooting at university, it really made me realise there’s some facets of our filming even just in these exercises in class that could be tweaked only so slightly to be wholly more considered and professional.

That said, another level of a lack of professionalism, and a major layer of lessons to be learned occurred in the last week, in our class exercise for Lenny, when we as a group, after having filmed, mistakenly did not export the proper amount of files from the card of the camera, meaning that what we had filmed was in the end lost. This of course is extremely unfortunate, as I would’ve liked to edit my own Lenny footage that I was a part of filming but it is certainly part of the process of all the things I need to be considering more when it comes to filming projects from now on. In lieu of this, I edited the footage that we had been editing in a previous class, the pre-filmed Lenny footage, and found it quite enthralling to use the hot-keys that had been provided as well as being afforded the luxurious thought of doing the “harder cut” after drafting the edit together. 

Made my bed

When filming my making the bed exercise the other night, I discovered something I must admit is quite unfortunate in the facet that, regardless of how good or bad DSLR’s are for filming video, I don’t really even know how to use it properly or to use the video function to the best of its ability. I realised this due to the work we’ve been doing in class trying to work out how to use the Sony cameras, and how we’re being shown all the different layers that we what the camera’s shot to look like before we even think about filming the shot. 

But tonight, I kind of had to take the L (“the loss”), and just go forth with it, and I felt the result was more or less pretty cool. Without a tripod for a DSLR, there are pretty limited positions any one person can fix onto their room to film their bed, but I felt the view’s I was able to manufacture were quite good, though at the time I was listening to music on my laptop, so the sound in the clip is completely different to the sound that is in the original source material. I recently purchased a Zoom H4n to bootleg more concerts I attend, but also knowing it would be a great device to have for filmmaking I used it to record myself, once again making my bed this morning. That in itself I guess is pretty neat, because it means in the video it is a capture of two times I’ve made the bed, once via video and once via audio. It was a nice touch as well for the sound to clip, as I’d landed on the bed in the video, I felt at least.

I also hope it is okay with Paul to be using a DSLR; I really don’t know but don’t think it fully would be.

Small Things.

The reason I signed up to do this studio stems from my conception that, in my third year, whilst gaining experience and/or learning different ways to approach media and explore my creative process – I’ve done work related to documentary, live tv, non-fiction film, as well as the work I’ve been able to do for Triple R until this point – I kind of got lost in this and feel a bit lacking in the extent to which I fully grasp, the smaller, more technical fundamentals of film. 

I would posit that so far I’ve missed out on fully conceiving these fundamentals, and I thought that this studio would help me reconcile this, and so far I feel like my thoughts in this respect have been vindicated as this studio is really enabling, or activating my duty to do this. The studio prompt invites us to investigate our filmmaking praxis through prompts and constraints, and I would say this is infact the aim that I am desiring from this course. That is, through prompts and constraints that will avoid me getting bogged down at this point or during the semester in the more creative more illustrative nature of film, I can spend more time in this studio focusing on improving my understanding of all the fundamentals as I make sure I consolidate my creative praxis from the ground up. In a way I think this cuts the fat, and allows one to focus more on the film theory that Jean Epstein advocated for in photogenie, as there is going to be less of a focus on the story, and more emphasis and the enhancement of moments through film, in a way as well. 

I’m really looking forward to exploring how I can consolidate my media making practice as this semester progresses. Though I should really start being more punctual to class.

 

Reflection — Assignment 4

Overall I found this semester very enthralling, despire bouts of, I would say, unproductivity and lack of attention. I think that nonetheless, I gained an understanding in this studio about a creative praxis I had never previously explored, and I am very thankful for that. This undeniably relies on the framework and foundation of our exploration of the relationship between the terms noticing, nonfiction and documentary.

I think this semester I really homed in on understanding how much of an antonym “noticing” could be to the word “vacant”. All of us would be so lacking if we weren’t noticing and marking more, as so much would be lost in our own lived experiences if we didn’t pay more attention to the things that we found interesting. I would posit that in the spectrum that exists in the realm of being vacant and fully noticing, there is an amount of noticing one does at a baseline level, but to fully notice, to subscribe to marking, noticing and recording, is to notice at a standard that exceeds this baseline. No Vacancy.

In the final assignment, I would say that my understanding of the boundaries (or lack thereof) of non-fiction really had an emphasis. There is something about Korsakow I think, in its synergistic qualities for non-fiction works, and the choose-your-own-adventure design of it all, such that I could choose any such video, and in clicking as much, simulate several squash points that could in turn simulate more? That is, at least what I would argue is something I noticed came from this assignment, that each Korsakow outcome was manufacturing a moment in squash, truly imaginative.

I think for me I ended up exploring a few noticing processes in the end, I would say that my understanding of lingering improved greatly, as each video in the Korsakow part of exploring squash allowed me to contextualise further how I could linger while moving, something I had noted was worth trying to further understand. I would say that the audiovisual part of exploring squash allowed me to dabble in wondering, as I was considering certain outcomes throughout my creative process that confront the hypothetical situations that I had been constantly considering for the assignment. I think there would even be an applicable argument that the Korsakow part is the fully formed conception of my question to recreating the experience of playing squash, and the video part almost serves as a visual representation of all the hypothetical thoughts that I had been laying down trying to conceptualise my project into fruition.

In terms of learning outcomes, I would say if I had to think of only three:

  • Allow one to understand and learn the dichotomy that exists between non-fiction and documentary

I’ve come to really understand the dichotomy that can exist between non-fiction and documentary, which is something I had never previously considered prior. I had also previously thought of non-fiction, in needing to be “real” and not fictional, as way more limited that I now feel it is. I think this comes from an acceptance and understanding that things can be real, but explored so much more thoroughly than we do, at our usual baseline of noticing.

  • Encourage one to explore beyond the boundaries of baseline noticing

As I have been opining about, I would argue that Seeing the Unseen, in its entirely was constantly pushing those that undertook the course to transcend beyond the bassline nature of their own lived experience. Because in the same vein that Hannah has a Korsakow document that intends to never end, our transcending baseline noticing would most certainly allow for an improved lived experience, which affectionately brings me to my last outcome..

  • Force one to confront the presence of living media in our day to day lives

By this I mean, in the sense that Benning’s works were perhaps the most important works to contextualise this Studio, the studio really did encourage us to constantly be thinking of how what we were experiencing could become a non-fiction piece. This is why we all ended up looking to the sky, I think.

 

 

 

the other part of the project

I think overall, it was a pretty good idea to have my project not fully summed up by the Korsakow document, to have an accompanying video. In total I filmed quite a lot of footage, that I felt like I would not be using at a point, both when I realised that a lot of the footage I had filmed had unfortunately been hindered by a lack of being actually focused correctly, and the initial ideas I had to explore layering through collaging felt more limited than I first thought as a result.

However, I think it was very much a silver lining, the spur of the moment decision to film, with two iPhone cameras – inspired by Hannah in her suggestion for the Korsakow document, one camera on the left side of the court, the other one the right side –  an entire game, because it very much allows for a greater level of experimentation and for me to be able to facilitate all of audiovisual aspects I was hoping to explore in squash in a far more easier way – as they are two videos with more or less exactly the same sound, albeit different video, allowing for the exploration of the sound design of the squash sounds, as well as levels of layering that could operate on much more simple terms. Here, there wasn’t much need to craft too much, it was more matter of fact, but certainly explores the movements that exist in the Korsakow videos a bit more, allowing one to contextualise the space, as well as having I would say at points a congruent sound design to the Korsakow document when there are two videos being viewed in Korsakow

dealing with korsakow

The Korsakow document looks great, though I am having trouble with the format of my work. The videos are seeming good in their stature but I think some need tinkering to an extent. At the moment, they all appear to be constantly changing their resolution each time I click on the video, so I feel like it is very much still a work in progress, but I do like the foundations of what exists. What I enjoy the most is the fact that the sounds of both the larger video and any of the small videos one places their cursor over, play simultaneously with each other.

This week in class when we showed our rough cuts, it was suggested to me by Hannah, on top of fixing the video formatting that needed to be done, that I could also position the – correctly formatted videos – in a style which was in its own way mimicking the very nature of a squash court. That is, spacing the videos in a manner which was more like playing squash, such that the videos on the left of the field would respond accordingly and reach the right of the field.

I feel like the moment I understood how to facilitate this, I was so satisfied, as I felt like some major inroads had been made in my understanding of the program, as well as my own joy in seeing the idea come into fruition. Hannah was definitely right here with her lightbulb moment idea, the videos combined as such look so fluid, which combined with the sound is just so very clearly the best placement for the videos that they could possibly be. I also added a MIDDLE thumbnail, for when the videos seemed to take place more so in the middle of the court.

bright new ideas

I was mulling over Hannah’s suggestion of a Korsakow idea that involved formatting around a squash courts left and right sides. I ended up reaching a new realisation at squash later on in the week, that it would be similarly as worthwhile to film two videos, one of the left side of the court, and one of the right side of the court, as a framework for the question that I had for this project, as well as to explore lingering, for video.

Looking over the footage today has been really cool, filmed over the length of the game, 7 minutes in total each, one of them has like a marginal amount of milliseconds more footage than the other, so straight off trying to sync the videos together led to a nice stumble, I would say wonder into a combination of footage that communicates the importance of sound in squash I had made an idea about. The slightly out of sync delay creates this really fascinating echo that resonates each shot a little more, and I thought it may be something worth exploring in Pro Tools. I’d argue that the M/O for wondering, is that it is a creative praxis that can be done way more front on that lingering, as so much of the wondering can take place after all the marking has been done, constantly trying to consider different scenarios that could allow me to facilitate the question I have to consider for this assignment. I would say it is hit and miss too, in a manner that is totally complimentary to the task at hand, but I created this Pro Tools document in which I duplicated the original sound file of one of the videos 15 times, then separated the audio milliseconds apart, but the final result of this wasn’t very fruitful, more just loud.

decisions decisions decisions

So far, with this new idea that I’ve been brainstorming of squash and recreating the experience of playing squash, trying to work out how to film lingering on work with the material that I have currently filmed

so far I have

  • filmed movement by lingering on the subject
  • filmed with a tripod

my current ideas are to

  • create a Korsakow file of all the lingered movement, allowing the subject to interact with the space of a squash court
    • recreate a squash scene DIY- from the sound up
  • highlighting the sound, with the intention of creating a delay in the sound to explore the importance of the sound, perhaps making use of some of the motifs I learnt while doing sound design as well

I would say this then will amount to two parts to make up a whole, for the assignment in all its parts, with one part being something created in Korsakow, and another part being a short audiovisual piece

I think one such video I am considering creating is one that seeks to prove the importance of the sound in squash, via perhaps exploring how it feels to put audio and video on delay. I recently learnt about the theoretical sound framework, synchresis, which refers to the spontaneous mental fusion between a sound and the video that it is presented with. I feel like this lopsided video of audio on delay could be offputting in it’s essence, but i really do want to explore it.

I will make a 1 minute video, of a short edited sequence in which the sequence is repeated, each time the sound is delayed more, I think this will be interesting. This in a way to perhaps be similar to Scattered Squash, but without the erratic video element

Further Written Research

The Jones (2011) reading is really hefty, and I feel there is quite a lot to gather from it. One of the things I gathered was a reading exploring the videoing practices of BASE jumpers, which “document and elongate the ephemeral experience of BASE jumping, and fix in… achievement which accompanies these experiences” (Ferrell et. al. 2001). To extrapolate this and supplant it into my overarching ideas around squash, I feel as if what I will be trying to do seeks directly to elongate the ephemeral experience of playing squash. Ferrell et al (2001) explore Lacan’s three moments in the production of the (centered) subject: an initial gaze, a moment of understanding, and a moment to conclude, with respect to how it is a process that plays itself out in an event such as a BASE jump.

I would say, here, that lingering on squash, on one’s quick movements, from the point that they serve, until the point ends, also fulfils these moments, in the Real, Imaginary and Symbolic. To take what Ferrell et al. (2001) take from Lacan’s philosophical field of work and place into BASE jumping context, and then to transfer that to the context of squash, I feel like it is just as fluid in a way. This is because, in the moment, I feel like there is something so visceral about the sensation of each point while playing squash, such that there have been points in which I’ve gotten carried away, far too easily, transcending the real and imagining boundaries that go beyond the geometrical confines, and getting hurt. It will be really interesting, not to see anyone get hurt, but perhaps to try to linger on those that get a bit too carried away in the moment, as these moments probably signify some of the strongest elements of the sport, at least for myself.

Sources –

Ferrell. J, Milovanovic. D, & Lyng, S (2001) Edgework, media practices, and the elongation of meaning: A theoretical ethnography of the Bridge Day event, Theoretical Criminology, vol.5 (2), 177-202, SAGE Publications

Rodney H. Jones (2011) Sport and re/creation: what skateboarders can teach us about learning, Sport, Education and Society, vol.16 (5), 593-611, DOI: 10.1080/13573322.2011.601139