The final edit was enthralling while being quite interesting. As previously mentioned the asset of both our in a way failure to fully mark every thing – or as I would prefer to put it our failure to acknowledge the unfortunate nature of our imperfect minds or something. But the aftermath of this has meant that our work functions in an interesting way, I decided maybe to highlight the other persons failure to mark by accentuating the person who did mark a part of the recipe the other didnt more, – which I feel in a way works really well as it means that the final project when we both reflect might work as a reminder for both of us to acknowledge that we need to learn how to notice more, which in a way is pretty cool. But then accompanying this, the extent to which we follow through with our ideas apart from this I think is also reflected in the edit, or the footage at least as it becomes quite clear the dichotomous nature of the two places, and it doesnt seem too hard to differentiate which footage is sourced from which destination.

That said Im not sure whether this flows, or this is what was intended though I feel like it is as we didnt have any recourse to know what our fellow group members favourite or most knowledge of understanding place would be

I learnt about non fiction and noticing that theres an overlap that exists between both aspects – in which a narrative can in a way be look past or ignored to make way for a video that just presents itself as a video. Having just watched the film NoaA at MIFF, i thought about the films non fiction aspects that help the fictional narrative flow, as they describe the scene before it, in a way.