Certeau

Certeau links “strategies” with institutions and structures of power who are the “producers”, while individuals are “consumers” acting in environments defined by strategies by using “tactics”. In the influential chapter “Walking in the City”, Certeau asserts that “the city” is generated by the strategies of governments, corporations, and other institutional bodies who produce things like maps that describe the city as a unified whole.

Certeau uses the vantage from the World Trade Center in New York to illustrate the idea of a panoptic, unified view. By contrast, the walker at street level moves in ways that are tactical and never fully determined by the plans of organizing bodies, taking shortcuts in spite of the strategic grid of the streets. This concretely illustrates Certeau’s argument that everyday life works by a process of poaching on the territory of others, using the rules and products that already exist in culture in a way that is influenced, but never wholly determined, by those rules and products.

Source

Institutions of today

Unpacking the institution:

Institutions must be enduring, regulate and stricture activities, are collectivist, develop working practices, employees and people associated are expected to share the values, public is aware of the status

Two instititions
The ABC (Australian Broadcast Corporation) is a good example because it has been around for a very long time. Its funded primarily though government taxing and do not show advertisements online or on TV. They are careful to protect their brand images because they insist they deliver reliable news which is unbiased.

Facebook is a container which fociuses primarily a social media. Its image youthful although they value all members of society. They regulate though user feedback. Facebook now has a social conglomerate after buying Whatsapp and Instagram. It generates money though advertising and shares data information with business clients to predict social trends

 

Im a bit worried

So after today meeting i really don’t feel comfortable about our theme. Originally we were just going to focus on how films are structured compared to other mediums. Now we have narrowed the theme to “What make a successful childrens narrative”. I dont feel comfortable doing this theme because i feel like we’ve backed ourselves into a corner. But if Hannah and Elise are comfortable with this theme i’m happy. I trust them.

Are the audiences listening?

Audience theories date back to the early 20th century. in the 70’s there was a shift towards the idea that the audience is active, and not passive. The patriachy was interested in these theories to understand how to advertise properly.

Broadcast paradigm: the effect tv has on the nation, it orginingally wasnt there for advertisint. The culture industry that comes out of the 40’s 50’s, german jewish and saw what what happening in cinema, nazi brainwashing. Saw the American system and thought it was just as bad. The media was focused on keeeping the masses controlled

Post-broadcast paradigm: understands audiences are more complex and it is about recognising teh ragmentation of the audience. its about consumers. its about a different category of consumption. Individual choice

We have only lived in a post-broadcast world

Establishments who are interested in these thories: government, advertisers, communication occupationists, prodution houses, social scientist/psychologists, cultural theories/ media scholars. They use semiotic analyses

key debates

  • means of production is cheaper,
  • distribution and consumption (internet)
  • no longer do places do one soul area of production
  • convergence of telco companies and television
  • aesthetic sensililities, the emergence of true tv narratives

Audience practices is the main one

  • The living room is now brocken
  • What are audiences doing now

Media effects thoery

  • Anxiety of tvs power
  • audeicnes is passive/ manipulated brainwashed
  • lab experiments, focus groups, playground

What happens if your work is taken to court for copyright infringement

When doing student research, like for the upcoming group assignments, we are covered by a fair dealing claus ‘educational purposes’. Although this covers us from copyright infringement, it may not hold up in law. So even when using fair dealings as an offence its better to be safe than sorry and get approval.

Its ok to use copyright works for assignments but internal passwords should be used. Its alright to use copyrighted photos in scrapbooks or on posters but if they are going public it is not ok.

Things that the court will look if you are taken to court.
The purpose and character or the work; is it mocking someone or made for unsociable reasons.
The amount borrowed from a work and its substantiality in relation to the whole video
The effect on the marketplace. if your video gets more money than the original or destablizes the copyright holder
The potential to license the material you used off the original e.g If there was no reply in the copyright holders email

Parody and satire can be used as a defence, but it could also defame someones name.
substantially similar 10% or 30% rule
adaptions / modifications – licence / contracted rights

Documentary Filmmakers’ Statement of Best Practices in Fair Use

Copyright: Right or Wrong?

Copyright is automatic and what you create is what you own. Copyright it doesn’t protect an idea, it protects a creation

e.g. you cant copyright the Pen, but you can copyright a pen design.

Its usually a good idea to mark your work with a statement. So if you’ve made a script and are giving it to people, make it obvious that the script is yours. So a heading thats says something like “The information in this document is confidential and must not be used or without first obtaining [name] written consent”

What are the different elements contained in copyright?

Exclusive rights: Sets out economic rights for your work e.g If someone can use if for commercial purposes
Original works: Are artistic, literary, dramatic works
Subject matter other than works: sound recording, cinematographic works, Tv, published editions
Exceptions: employer ownership, contract/licence, assignment of rights – youtube is given a non exclusive right

Moral rights: applies to all copyright works referencing – treatment of work
Integrity: – honour and reputation
Right of attribution: Its the creators right to be attributed to their creation. Offending this right by not attributing can lead to lawsuite
Right of false attribution: Self explanatory, if a work is falsely attributed to another person

Duration of copyright – Copyright lasts the life of the author plus 70 years. Different countries have differing terms. there are certain factors that influence duration of copyright aswell.

Even if the work is unpublished it is still under copyright. If it is published anonymously or under a pseudonym it is still under copyright

Exceptions: public – fair dealing, Education, Libraries/archives, Cultural institutions/museums
Infringement:  Rights of ownership. It is an infringement to use a substantial part of a work (quality rather than quantity) without permission e.g uploading Avengers to youtube. If the Moral rights of the copyright holder are challenge they can sue

 

 

Copyright Exploration

In todays Lectorial a portion was devoted to the concept of copyright and appropriation. My view on Copyright is a lot different now that im an ‘Adult’ because it means im more accountable for using other peoples material. Music is a big thing I use in my videos without asking for permission. Its kind of scary because someones more likely to sue. Ive been working on Abelton Live so that i can produce my own music instead on relying on getting permission.

Over the next week i’m going to research and then build an essay that explores the idea of originality by looking at the past, present and future of the art world.

I’ll split the essay into two sections which are linked bellow.

Part 1: Jeff Koons, Warhol and Duchamp – Challenges for the art world

Part 2: Michael Mandiberg – New age appropriation and ‘the remix’

 

Selected Listening N°9: Lyle Mays – Teiko (1987)


Teiko is amazing. The sweeping synths and symbols build a mechanical rhythm which entices us into a land of fantasy sounds. At about 4minutes into the song, the double bass and the Soprano saxophone come to the forfront. The percussion builts in voloume with these instruments. What i really like about this song, the album, and Jazz in genreal, is that everything magically ‘works’. Theres no ultimate climax, jazz is just progression from one hump to another. its not danceable, maybe head bobable, but
wash of synths and then offers a mechanical rhythm that is vaguely Asian in feeling
Piano, Synthesizer, Autoharp
Saxophone Double Bass

Feedback on PB3

Red Hat – FilthyRatbag

  • I really liked
  • Flows very well. it seems like a conversation.
  • How can these works be refined

 

Green Hat Nigels

  • Really liked the found footage and how i tied in with the story
  • I really liked the tiling
  • The pacing felt perfect
  • But i feel like the level or tone of the film of the film didn’t really change, but then again it doen’t really need to change level
  • the comment on it, i felt like the level of the film kind of needed to change

Red Hat Jasmine Winecier

  • I found the video to be upbeat and made me feel happy that the interviewee was happy
  • I thought some of the shots were a bit noisy but it didnt really matter

 

Selected Listening N°8: Fatima Al Qadiri – Brute (album)

https://fatimaalqadiri.bandcamp.com/track/endzone

Fatima Al Qadiri’s Newest Album ‘Brute’  is a comment on Protest, the police and the media around the world. The album opens with overwhelming confusion with recordings of the unrest in Ferguson. A loud thump is heard every 5seconds as the confusion builds. Shouting and sirens howl, putting the listener onto the streets. ‘Endzone’ sets the scene and the following tracks build upon its ominous timbre.

The ambient atmosphere Fatima builds through the album is built up to the final track ‘Power’. This is the first song thats actually danceable. It takes elements from previous tracks and reconfigures them into the new song with the loud thump from ‘Endzone’.

With just field recordings, i think this album aims to comment on the corrupt nature of the media and the over-militarization of police departments who are  “drunk with power”.

Give it a listen.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T8T36ns-Paw